Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poser
It would have to be about 17% at current spending levels.

You mean the spending levels that added 7.5 trillion to the deficit?

71 posted on 01/12/2015 8:30:51 AM PST by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: spodefly

Their are three ways to balance the budget:
1. Cut spending
2. Raise taxes
3. Both 1 and 2

None of these address the fairness of the tax system. A flat tax is one perception of a fairer system than the current one. Their are two common misconceptions about a flat tax among the lesser informed public.

The first is that the average person’s taxes would go down. This is not only false, it is the exact opposite of reality. The second is that corporations would pay more. This is also the exact opposite of reality.

In fact, a flat tax would reduce the the taxes paid by those in the upper tax brackets, including big corporations. Both are currently paying far more than the proposed flat tax rates.

The one perception that may be correct is that all taxpayers would have some skin in the game instead of the 53% who currently pay taxes versus the 47% who don’t.


78 posted on 01/12/2015 8:59:48 AM PST by Poser (Cogito ergo Spam - I think, therefore I ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson