Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WashPost Asks, With Straight Face: Why Didn't Strict Gun Laws Stop Charlie Hebdo Massacre?
Newsbusters ^ | January 9, 2015 | Tim Graham

Posted on 01/09/2015 1:12:52 PM PST by HammerT

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Lizavetta

They are simply following the commands and footsteps of Mohammad, may piss be upon him. The terrorists are the “good” Muslims according to that horrible faith.


41 posted on 01/09/2015 2:31:15 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

RPG and fully automatic AK-47’s.... and the leftists say its a great thing the victims were not armed because that would be “worse”


42 posted on 01/09/2015 2:34:29 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HammerT
Remember this one next time some urban sophisticate tells you they're just smarter there. Jaw-dropping. I'm surprised nobody has blamed the NRA yet. Or the Tea Party. They'll be blaming the Front National by now but I doubt if many in France will be listening to that one.

True, these are criminals and so probably aren't much affected by gun control laws anyway, but more to the point, they are terrorists with connections to organizations that are better-funded than their own municipal governments. Munitions aren't a problem. Smuggling isn't a problem. Infrastructure isn't a problem. That's what these guys do. Why anyone over the age of 8 doesn't realize this is a real wonder.

43 posted on 01/09/2015 2:34:40 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

Maher said all religions are like that and Dean said this had nothing to do with Islam.

Both are wrong, 100% wrong


44 posted on 01/09/2015 2:35:15 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

Imagine if the person shooting the video cam of the terrorists running around in the street shooting the cop was armed with an AK-47 instead. Bye bye terrorists and maybe the next ones would think twice before pulling that atrocity again.


45 posted on 01/09/2015 2:36:20 PM PST by shove_it (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen -- Dennis Prager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

The biggest factor of course is the makeup of the citizenry. You can have arms and be relatively peaceful like the Swiss or armed maybe illegally as in Chicago and have mayhem.


46 posted on 01/09/2015 2:38:31 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I was referring to the Dean quote posted, which I excerpted, and the Maher comments that if Catholics killed people for defecting there would be much more of an outcry against Catholicism than you are seeing against Islam.


47 posted on 01/09/2015 2:39:00 PM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: HammerT
How did the attackers get the guns?

/shrugs/ The guns were probably delivered from Libya, across the Mediterranean Sea, by Arab contraband runners. Given that France was the driving force behind Gaddhafi's overthrow, the chickens have come home to roost, as they always do.

Or, perhaps, they wanted to know WHY did the attackers get the guns? Well, that's equally easy. Because they needed them to kill some people. You see, those are extremely simple questions with extremely simple answers. One has to be a highly educated liberal to pretend on TV that this is rocket science.

48 posted on 01/09/2015 2:40:45 PM PST by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HammerT

Well I know I have the weapons at home to engage those guys....


49 posted on 01/09/2015 2:54:51 PM PST by Kozak ("It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal" Henry Kissinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

“Indeed? Did the French Police not blow their whistles loud enough? How could this tragedy have occurred?”

When I saw the french cops who were bicycle cops with their little bike helmets and no weapons, I didn’t know whether to laugh, or weep...


50 posted on 01/09/2015 2:57:34 PM PST by Kozak ("It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal" Henry Kissinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
I’m reminded of the beaten and battered ex-wife who gets a restraining order against her abusive ex husband. And as he returns to beat and choke her to death - she keeps waiving that restraining order in his face

Immediately upon reading this post I saw in my mind the picture of Neville Chamberlain waving his little piece of paper after reaching an agreement with the Fuhrer.
51 posted on 01/09/2015 2:58:54 PM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HammerT

The only ones without guns were the freak’n police.


52 posted on 01/09/2015 3:03:37 PM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HammerT
clearly a twisted, cultish mind.

The average hog hugging, goat molesting mooslimb.

53 posted on 01/09/2015 3:05:26 PM PST by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HammerT

I want to point out one thing:

Anti-gun liberals from all over know they’re going to get roasted over the coals of logic on this French Islamist terror wave, evidence of which is already showing up in opinion pieces where they’re trying to capture and narrow the debate before the facts are known. Ordinarily, they chastise their opposition from making political hay when events like these occur, but this one is so awful that they can’t just stand pat and try to browbeat their opponents into silence -— so they’re trying to get out some kind of narrative to shift the debate.

You can always tell when a liberal is about to get their ass argumentatively kicked when they’re compelled to blurt out a knee-jerk reaction to a high profile event.

We absolutely cannot let them make claims that just because most Americans are now able to CCW that it somehow makes those of us who do so into little junior G-man counter-terrorist special agents ready to confront armed bad guys and be a hero saving the lives of hostages and bystanders. That’s fantasy, theirs, not mine.

No, sir. No, that’s not what my carry piece is intended for. My carry piece is intended to protect ME, not you or anyone else. Sucker, you’re on your own. If I see some French-Algerian Islamist pointing an AK47 or an RPG rocket in your face at a gas station, me and my CCW piece are headed in the opposite direction. I’ll be a good witness for the cops instead, and will go into great detail with investigators later on about how they shot your unarmed ass down in cold blood.

That’s the message we need to be sending in reply to all gun grabbing anti-gunners who try to touch on the topic of American CCW in relation to this dreadful terror attack in France. Any rational person either on the fence or leaning towards their side will come running over to our side when the scope of the debate is laid out like this: “It should be abundantly clear that you are on your own. The laws won’t stop the killers. I’ve got my gun, where’s yours?”. Period.

Just look at the gun sales figures these days. People all over are waking up.


54 posted on 01/09/2015 3:59:17 PM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HammerT

“WashPost Asks, With Straight Face: Why Didn’t Strict Gun Laws Stop Charlie Hebdo Massacre?”

Always remember that 50 IQ liberals are our canaries in the coal mine. When savages start killing these morons by the hundreds, it’s a signal to us to man the barricades, lock and load and kill barbarians by the thousands. Rich barbarian democrat campaign donors should be given a chance to run, be caught and hanged from lampposts.


55 posted on 01/09/2015 4:38:13 PM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HammerT

I’d like to as him how so many people become drug addicts since most drugs are illegal.

.


56 posted on 01/09/2015 4:45:52 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HammerT
The collective IQ of the writers at the Washington Post are less than room temperature. Even Howard Dean (!) blurted out the truth: France HAS draconian gun control and the Muslim killers had military grade AKM assault rifles. That means that gun control is effective -- isn't that right you WaPo maroons?
57 posted on 01/09/2015 9:53:57 PM PST by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HammerT

UUUHHH, because criminals, terrorists and other pieces of sh#t don’t care about laws?


58 posted on 01/10/2015 5:20:38 PM PST by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

Well said - and I think you are very correct when you said: “Just look at the gun sales figures these days. People all over are waking up.”

I believe that is the case - I was at a gun show recently that I frequent every time it’s in town - it was packed for most of the day.

People know it’s only a matter of time before an attack happens here, they know that they will need to be able to defend themselves

AND they know that the socialist national gun grabber groups will try to use such an attack to take away the guns of those who wouldn’t even think of doing such a thing.


59 posted on 01/15/2015 5:54:33 AM PST by HammerT (The Right to keep and bear arms: A Commonsense Civil Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

Yes, that’s on video - it would well behoove everyone to have that at the ready for the next time the gun grabbers come back at us.


60 posted on 01/15/2015 5:56:04 AM PST by HammerT (The Right to keep and bear arms: A Commonsense Civil Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson