Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/09/2015 8:10:11 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Beltway Disease..........no known cure.


2 posted on 01/09/2015 8:12:25 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Batting average 1,000 (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Taxation without representation. Gas tax is for gas consumer roads infrastructure, pure and simple. SS is not part of that.


3 posted on 01/09/2015 8:13:09 AM PST by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The Establishment has spoken.


4 posted on 01/09/2015 8:13:54 AM PST by uncitizen (2015 Here we come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

That is a great Marxist idea.

Pray America is waking


7 posted on 01/09/2015 8:17:44 AM PST by bray (Sharpton is a murderer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Isn't the amount of the Stimulus from a few years back still in the baseline? Use that
8 posted on 01/09/2015 8:18:24 AM PST by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

> The only time you can even think of proposing a gas-tax increase is when oil prices are at rock bottom.

Don’t Gruber us. The gas tax is per gallon, not per dollar. Whether “oil prices are at rock bottom” has nothing to do with it.


9 posted on 01/09/2015 8:20:03 AM PST by Ray76 (al Qaeda is in the Oval Office (and John Boehner is their craven servant))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
So Chuck wants drivers to fund non-drivers FICA tax reductions?
10 posted on 01/09/2015 8:20:33 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
As a result, some in Congress are talking about a ten- or 20-cent hike in the federal tax to use for infrastructure spending. Right idea, wrong policy. The hike should not be 10 cents but $1. And the proceeds should not be spent by, or even entrusted to, the government. They should be immediately and entirely returned to the consumer by means of a cut in the Social Security tax.

Obama is willing to meet you halfway.

1 dollar per gallon tax increase one gasoline.

No offsetting cut in Social Security tax.

Hey. What are you complaining about. HE MET YOU HALFWAY!

12 posted on 01/09/2015 8:26:25 AM PST by Lazamataz (With friends like Boehner, we don't need Democrats. -- Laz A. Mataz, 2015)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Charles doesn't realize that though the tax might be "revenue-neutral" for consumers, it would deeply impact business and industry. The resultant necessity to shift or curtail production processes would likely lead to serious job losses.

Revenue-neutral is not really neutral at all.

13 posted on 01/09/2015 8:27:48 AM PST by BfloGuy ( Even the opponents of Socialism are dominated by socialist ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

No more Taxes, we are Taxed Enough Already!


14 posted on 01/09/2015 8:27:52 AM PST by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Dr. Krauthammer is a pretty sharp guy. Hence, it astounds me that he misses the point that taxes are a game for politicians to buy votes and reward their friends. Adding a gas tax will be permanent. Reducing other taxes will be temporary and will never offset the gas tax hike.

I support the idea of a VAT because it rewards frugality. However, we all know that a VAT would not replace income taxes. It would just be more money for the politicians.


16 posted on 01/09/2015 8:30:12 AM PST by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Here is an alternative: make the gas tax *regressive*.

The current United States federal excise tax on gasoline is 18.4 cents per gallon and 24.4 cents per gallon for diesel fuel. State taxes vary, see link below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_taxes_in_the_United_States#State_taxes

So say, if gasoline only costs a dollar, the gas taxes are 40 cents on that dollar.

But if the price of gasoline goes up to two dollars a gallon, the *regressive* gasoline taxes drop to 20 cents on the dollar.

If the price of gasoline goes up to three dollars a gallon, the *regressive* gasoline taxes drop to 10 cents.

And at four dollars a gallon, there are NO federal or state gasoline taxes.

Doing it this way will guarantee that politicians continue to strive to keep the price of gasoline and diesel as low as possible.


18 posted on 01/09/2015 8:31:36 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Krauthammer is a good Republican like the Republicans of the 50s and 60s who saw themselves as the tax collectors for Democrat spending.


19 posted on 01/09/2015 8:32:00 AM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Krauthammer...still drunk on the wine from George Will’s dinner party love-in with Obama in 2009.


21 posted on 01/09/2015 8:36:39 AM PST by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I wish Kraphammer would just stuff it. I have had it with his psoturing on FOX as though he was a conservative, when every once in a while like here and with the Second Amendment he demonstrates that his Democrat Roots were never removed.

He is just another RINO. SMarter than most, but a RINO nonetheless.


23 posted on 01/09/2015 8:40:58 AM PST by ZULU (Quo usque tandem abutere Obama patientia nostra? . Cicero, First Oration against Cataline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I do not approve of social engineering through tax law. Taxes should be for revenue only, and free Americans should be free to decide how to spend their money and their time without coercion or incentives. Tax incentives are invariably corrupted and inefficient.


24 posted on 01/09/2015 8:43:23 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Yet another policy from our political elite that hammers the middle class worker.


25 posted on 01/09/2015 8:45:30 AM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Much better would be a tariff on incoming foreign oil and refined products. This helps support our oil and natgas producers and the frackers,

$10-$20 per barrel tariff would be good


26 posted on 01/09/2015 8:46:15 AM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Screw the “average” American. I drive 1,100 miles per week and $1 a gallon increase would be roughly $40 per week for me while my taxes have gone up on everything else, my insurance cost has gone up, the cost of food and everything has gone up. When and only when I have a federal government that does only it’s constitutionally defined job and nothing more would I consider supporting any tax increases on anything. I watch sound barriers going up along interstates to protect sub divisions that were built after the interstate and I know that money is coming out of my taxes, I watch rails to trails being built and a handful of people using it that came out of my taxes, I watch public transportation where the any given bus has 3 passengers at any given time and hear talk about if they only had more tax money they could expand the bus routes, screw them all.


27 posted on 01/09/2015 8:46:38 AM PST by mikesmad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Still a liberal

Just a hawk on Israel and foreign policy

Which describes quite a few 1950-1990 Democrats

Does not make a Goldwater


29 posted on 01/09/2015 8:48:44 AM PST by wardaddy (glenn beck is a nauseous politically correct conservative on LSD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson