Posted on 12/22/2014 6:38:57 PM PST by SJackson
Wolves across the Great Lakes region are back under full protection of the federal Endangered Species Act as a result of a ruling by a federal judge Friday in Washington.
Judge Beryl A. Howell sided with animal rights groups in a 111-page decision stating the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service went too far in removing federal protections for wolves in nine Great Lakes states in 2012.
The judge ruled that wolves in the Great Lakes states be immediately placed under the protections of the government’s 1978 ruling to protect the animals, which had been hunted, trapped and harassed to near extinction at the time.
By then only a few hundred wolves remained in the continental United States, mostly in and around Minnesota’s Superior National Forest.
Under federal protections for three decades, wolf numbers rebounded in Minnesota, with the animals spreading into Wisconsin and Michigan. State and federal wildlife managers agreed that, by 2012, wolves had recovered well beyond expectations in the region, leading the Fish and Wildlife Service to declare the Great Lakes region a “distinct population’’ of gray wolf that had “recovered’’ under the terms of the Endangered Species Act.
The move was praised by sporting and farming groups that wanted to thin wolf population numbers, and Minnesota and Wisconsin state resource agencies immediately instituted hunting and trapping seasons in 2012. Seasons were held again in 2013, and this year.
But the Humane Society of the United States filed suit, saying the animal hadn’t fully recovered in all areas they once roamed, and that the Fish and Wildlife Service was wrongly carving out a small, successful population from vast areas where no wolves exist.
In Friday’s ruling, the judge granted summary judgment for the plaintiffs and ruled that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s “Final Rule” that the 2012 delisting is immediately vacated and the 1978 protections are immediately reinstated.
The move appears to leave Minnesota wolves officially “threatened,’’ with Wisconsin and Michigan wolves listed as “endangered.” The distinction allows a limited culling of wolves in Minnesota through targeted trapping, but no sport hunting or trapping seasons.
“The most important part of this decision is that it agrees wolf recovery needs to happen in more than just a few, core populations in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan before we can say they are recovered,” said Collette Adkins Giese, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity in Minnesota.
She said state resource agency action to immediately reinstate hunting and trapping seasons showed “that they can’t be trusted to manage these animals. The zeal they had to start killing wolves again showed the kind of wolf hatred that got them (wolves) on the endangered list in the first place really hasn’t gone away.”
If the ruling is not appealed and overturned in court it likely would take years for the Fish and Wildlife Service to resubmit a plan to de-list Great Lakes wolves yet again.
A total of 272 wolves were shot and trapped during limited seasons in Minnesota this year, more than the DNR’s target harvest of 250.
In addition, wolves near farms where livestock have been killed are targeted by federal trappers. And wolves seen near livestock can be shot by landowners in some areas.
Tom Landwehr, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources commissioner, said the agency has not yet seen the judge’s decision.
“We’ll have to take a look at it with our attorneys on Monday and see where we stand,” Landwehr said. “But if it does go back to listed, that has immediate implications… Our hunting seasons are over but we still have management options for landowners (to shoot wolves) that would have to end if they are listed again.”
Jonathan Lovvorn, senior vice president and chief counsel for animal protection litigation at The Humane Society of the United States, said the judge ruled the Fish and Wildlife Service failed to explain how the “virtually unregulated” killing of wolves in Minnesota and Wisconsin does not constitute a continued threat to the species.
The judge was especially critical of Minnesota’s wolf management plan that allows unchecked shooting of wolves in agricultural areas of the state. Lovvorn agreed.
“In the short time since federal protections have been removed, trophy hunters and trappers have killed more than 1,500 Great Lakes wolves” and dramatically reduced wolf numbers, Lovvorn said in a statement. “We are pleased that the court has recognized that the basis for the delisting decision was flawed, and would stop wolf recovery in its tracks.”
The same court in September ruled that Wyoming wolves should still be under federal protections.
A survey last winter showed Minnesota has about 2,423 wolves in 470 packs, mostly across the northern one-third of the state. In Wisconsin, last winter’s estimate showed about 670 wolves in the state. Those surveys were before this year’s hunting and trapping seasons.
What would the US Fish and Wildlife Service or the states know about wolves. The Judge knows better. A judge appointed by The One to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. She hasn't seen any four legged wolves in her neighborhood, they must be endangered. Related articles
Figures this is from Minnysooootah
“We are pleased that the court has recognized that the basis for the delisting decision was flawed, and would stop wolf recovery in its tracks.”
What? No mention that 0bama was the one to de-list them?
*SMIRK*
Only good wolf is a dead wolf.
I sure would love to see President Cruz use “prosecutorial discretion” and refuse to enforce the Endangered Species Act.
I’ve heard from some people in the Upper Midwest that they no longer go out in the woods without packing heat for the “endangered” wolves.
They claim they’re seeing LOTS of tracks.
In SE Az they reintroduced the Mexican Grey Wolf.
Ranchers killed them all in short order and did it protecting lives or property.
I’d appreciate if president Cruz would submit a law to the republican congress to strip activist groups of their right to sue in federal courts on behalf of animals, trees and air and water molecules. Strip away that special status and this lunacy will stop.
The next thing you know, they will want the American Buffalo restored to its original habitat,
and order all humainty and signs of civilization removed so that they can reproduce to the previous natural bounds of their original habitat .
Then next would be the restoration of the American Paleo-Indian habitat, if they could find any ..
And next there would be the restoration of Tyanasaurus Rex, once cellular division and cloneing could be sustained .
At what point does this restoration of natural habitat become absurd an unconscionable and unreasonable ?
This is the same judge....
Judge seems skeptical of challenge to Obama immigration plan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3239888/posts
“U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell heard arguments Monday in a case brought by an Arizona sheriff who claims the program will let more illegal immigrants enter the country and commit crimes, burdening law enforcement.”
Come on, now!!! The agricultural areas are the only places cows, sheep, goats, pigs, chickens, ducks, geese and turkeys live. You know your honor... What the wolves euphemistically call "food".
Animal owners of the agricultural areas. Learn three words:
Shoot, shovel, shutup.
Got a hint for you. They get lead poisoning all the time.
A couple years ago, a dead wolf was found, hit by a car, on the off ramp from the Hoan Bridge just a mile south of downtown Milwaukee. They are recovered enough for me.
SSS
Shoot, Shovel & Shut up
What a dim-bulb Bryn Mawr graduate don’t know, won’t hurt ya...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.