Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: US infrastructure ‘embarrassing’
The Hill ^ | December 3, 2014 | Justin Sink

Posted on 12/04/2014 7:40:35 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

President Obama told corporate leaders Wednesday he was embarrassed by U.S. infrastructure that was "falling behind" countries like China who spent aggressively on construction projects.

"I’d much rather have our problems than China’s problems. That I’m confident about. On the other hand, the one thing I will say is if they need to build some stuff, they can build it," the president said during a Q-and-A with members of the Business Roundtable. "And over time, that wears away our advantage competitively. It’s embarrassing. You know, you drive down the roads and you look at what they’re able to do."

The president said that during his recent trip to China, world leaders worked out of a building that "probably put most of the conference centers here to shame."

"They had built it in a year," he continued. "Now, you got an authoritarian government, you know, that isn’t necessarily accountable. I understand we’re not going to do that. But if they’re able to build their ports, their airports, their smart grid, their air traffic control systems, their broadband systems with that rapidity and they’re highly superior to ours, over time that’s going to be a problem for us."

The president acknowledged that securing funding for infrastructure in the U.S. was politically difficult, and especially because many road and bridge projects were paid for with a gas tax lawmakers were loathe to increase.

"Votes on gas taxes are really tough," Obama said. "Gas prices are one of those things that really bug people."

But Obama said that he hoped that lawmakers could find an infrastructure revenue stream that was "not so politically frightening to members of Congress," and that the issue could be part of discussions in a broader tax reform package.

"It’s probably a good time for us to redesign and think through, what is a sustainable way for us on a regular basis to make the investments we need," the president said.

Obama said that "window" to work on tax reform would likely only exist if lawmakers were able to provide some "certainty" by passing a government funding measure in the lame-duck.

The president said that, although he is encouraged by early statements from Republican leaders, Washington also needed to break the "notion that if you disagree on one thing, then suddenly everybody takes their ball home and they don’t play."

"We have to be able to disagree on some things while going ahead and managing the people’s business and working on the things where we do agree," Obama said. "You know, democracy is messy, but it doesn’t have to be chaos."

Lawmakers appear to be circling around a legislative package that would largely fund the government through the remainder of the fiscal year, with the exception of the Department of Homeland Security, which would only receive funding until the spring.

Republican leaders say doing that would give them leverage to pressure the president to roll back his recently announced executive actions on immigration reform.

Obama said Wednesday he suspected "that temperatures need to cool a little bit in the wake of my executive action."

"Certainly there will be pressure initially within Republican caucuses to try to reverse what I’ve done, despite the fact that what I’m doing I think is exactly the right thing to do," Obama said.

But he thanked the gathering — which included dozens of corporate executives from some of the nation's biggest companies — for their support in his push for comprehensive immigration reform, saying he was grateful for their lobbying efforts.

The president said he was optimistic that congressional leaders would strike a deal, and also signaled tacit support for a bill that would temporarily renew dozens of tax credits. Last week, the White House threatened to veto a long-term package being negotiated by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) over concerns it would make some business-friendly credits permanent without doing so for programs benefiting the working poor.

"As a general rule, we are open to short-term extensions of many of those provisions to make sure that all of you are able to engage in basic tax planning, at least for the next couple of years, and are not having to scramble during tax time figuring out what exactly the rules are," Obama said.

But the president said his general preference was a broader package that included both business credits and "provisions that benefit working families."

Obama also said he believed "there is definitely a deal to be done" on corporate tax reform, saying there was "a lot of overlap" with principles outlined by Camp.

Still, the president acknowledged "big hurdles" standing in the way of a tax deal, including resistance to reforms that might eliminate deductions preferred by many corporate leaders. "In the short term, there are going to be some winners and losers, including in this room," Obama said. "The question then becomes, are folks willing and ready to go ahead and make that move for the sake of a simpler, more streamlined, more sensible tax system?"

The president also said Republicans were pushing for cuts to the individual tax code to account for family-owned small businesses, and that could be a stumbling block for members of his own party.

"What we’re not willing to do is to structure a tax deal in which either it blows up the deficit — essentially we can’t pay for the revenue that’s lost — or alternatively, that you get tax shifting from businesses to middle-class and working families," he said. "And so when you start introducing the individual side, it gets more complicated in terms of who’s benefiting, what are the rates, how is it restructured."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: construction; infrastructure; obama; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
Maybe our infrastructure would be better now had you spent that one trillion dollar stimulus on improving our infrastructure, you lying thief. He sure admires Communist China, doesn't he?
1 posted on 12/04/2014 7:40:35 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Its another, simplistic, easily chanted leftist trope and cliche that benefits them greatly - “our decaying infrastructure”


2 posted on 12/04/2014 7:42:59 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t agree with Obola on this, but I will admit he is a world class expert on the subject of embarrassing America.


3 posted on 12/04/2014 7:43:07 AM PST by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed is his demon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Of course Obama thinks government should be bigger.

We should give it all to Uncle Sam 'cause nothing else in the world matters but government power.

4 posted on 12/04/2014 7:43:13 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Where we live the infrastructure is good. Then again I don’t live in Rathole country I live in fly over country.


5 posted on 12/04/2014 7:43:22 AM PST by defconw (If not now, WHEN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

WHO SAID THIS?

THEN, THIS:


6 posted on 12/04/2014 7:44:03 AM PST by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Obama: US infrastructure ‘embarrassing’

No, sir! YOU are embarrassing!

7 posted on 12/04/2014 7:44:34 AM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We also basically paid for China’s upgrades with our trade imbalance and Barry giving them money.


8 posted on 12/04/2014 7:44:48 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Let’s take all of the money Barry has allocated to his effort to destroy the best healthcare system in the world and apply it to our roads and bridges.

All would be well in 5 years.


9 posted on 12/04/2014 7:45:26 AM PST by G Larry (Amnesty imposes SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL immigrants & minorities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Obama: US infrastructure ‘embarrassing’

Fixed it!

10 posted on 12/04/2014 7:45:50 AM PST by PROCON (Always give 100%...unless you're donating blood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Chinese have massively overbuilt as a payoff to government bureaucrats. I imagine emperor Obama wants the same for here.


11 posted on 12/04/2014 7:46:23 AM PST by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

HMMMmmmmm... If ONLY someone had a few $trillion (or 4) to spend on “shovel ready” projects... that would have been awesome for fixing our ‘infrastructure’, huh?


12 posted on 12/04/2014 7:46:45 AM PST by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Obama: US infrastructure ‘embarrassing’”

*YAWN*

Same schtick, different day.

Since the POSOTUS hates all that America stands for anyway, let’s just assume he’s always embarrassed by {fill in an issue}.


13 posted on 12/04/2014 7:46:56 AM PST by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I thought this was taken care of in his first term.


14 posted on 12/04/2014 7:47:10 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s not our infrastructure that is embarrassing.


15 posted on 12/04/2014 7:47:36 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Everything fine here in NJ. Infrastructure MUCH better than it was 40 years ago.

It keeps improving.

But we need to spend another trillion Federal tax dollars.

Now what can we spend them on... anything... maybe we can burn them. Shhhh don’t tell anybody the government can create dollars, it does not have to borrow them from international banking.

We have to keep collecting taxes from those sheeple, can’t have them accumulating any wealth.


16 posted on 12/04/2014 7:48:46 AM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I’d much rather have our problems than China’s problems.

I wish Obama was China's problem.

Other than that, I agree with his statement.

17 posted on 12/04/2014 7:48:56 AM PST by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He’s free to resign, renounce his citizenship, and move there anytime he wishes.


18 posted on 12/04/2014 7:49:00 AM PST by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
0bama want the same central command economy that China has.
That's what he's really jealous about.

19 posted on 12/04/2014 7:50:03 AM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The resident O measures China’s “infrastructure” based on what he sees from the presidential suite at the Beijing Hilton. 90% of the country is a crap hole.


20 posted on 12/04/2014 7:50:18 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson