Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/25/2014 9:29:00 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Lone Wolf Terrorist Muzzies.

The media liked saying Eric Rudolph was Christian. He wasn’t. They liked doing the same for Timothy McVeigh too but he was far removed from Christianity. But they have a hard time calling a muslim terrorist a muslim terrorist.


2 posted on 10/25/2014 9:34:34 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Not stupid. Evil, malevolent, nefarious and his Islamic roots are showing with his hatred for Israel and America and all America’s allies; this includes America’s military but leave the backyard “waterways” alone...evil,.

I just hope and pray America doesn’t go the way of Rome in two more years with the barbarians flooding through the southern borders and Obama importing” moderate Islamists,” whatever those are.

Might be nice to take a note from Canada but I think the snarky snarks and the political czars will poo-poo while eating their own ebola-ized sh*t and believing it.


3 posted on 10/25/2014 9:35:34 AM PDT by Karliner ( Jeremiah 29:11, Romans 8:28- 8:38"...this is the end of the beginning."WC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"Obama is either too stupid or too doctrinaire to recognize the threat and as long as his party remains in power, America will continue to suffer the humiliation of retreat."

The author leaves out the possibility that Obama is a Muslim or Muslim sympathizer who supports jihad against the West and want Islam to conquer the land of the infidels.

4 posted on 10/25/2014 9:35:35 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

***They even hate Barack Obama.***

Mr. Nantz apparently knows something I don’t.


5 posted on 10/25/2014 9:36:51 AM PDT by Paulie (Get off the grid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’m not sure that just because British & Canadian heads of government condemn Islamic violence that it means they are standing up to Islamic violence. They may just be paying lip service to it. I haven’t seen Cameron deporting his grooming gangs yet.


6 posted on 10/25/2014 9:43:27 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard III: Loyalty Binds Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
It was not “senseless violence” as the perpetually confused Barack Obama asserts.

He's not confused at all. There's simply no room in his worldview for "evil" unless it's connected to racism, conservatism, Christianity, or capitalism. Expecting him to brand Islamic terrorism as "evil" is like asking someone to draw a square circle.

7 posted on 10/25/2014 9:50:18 AM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

They HATE everything but most of all I believe that they hate themselves deep down having no comfort in their own being or where life can take them. Death to them is the answer. Muzzie heaven awaits. They are even worse off emotionally than Progressives.


8 posted on 10/25/2014 10:04:40 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

All Muslims are mandated to Jihad by MadMo and the Koran.

Thus, it is unambiguously clear that any and all Muslims pose a risk of going Jihadi-Wacko at any time and with no warning.

As proof, Google the picture of the Muslim who shot up the Canadian Parliament, the one with his dog in his arms as he sat on the porch.

As any can be dangerous, follow the wisdom of St Ann, who said “Invade them, Convert them, or Kill them”.


11 posted on 10/25/2014 10:20:53 AM PDT by GladesGuru (Islam Delenda Est. Because of what Islam is - and because of what Muslims do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Guess the 'history of mental illness' meme has run it's course with these cases of sudden jihad syndrome. Now, backed into a corner, authorities admit it's terrorism, but to tone down alarm, limit characterizing each incident to a 'lone wolf' whose 'extremist' leanings were self inflicted.

No jihad is a lone-wolf event. Fourteen hundred years of this garbage proves the consistency of collective brainwashing the Islamic doctrine creates.

Sigh. The msm persists with the 'lone wolf' narrative when it's highly unlikely any of these jihad attacks were done without some coordination from fellow believers fulfilling their doctrinal obligation to perform jihad. This instance is no exception. There were two very early reports online which revealed details ignored by the mainstream media. No surprise there.


13 posted on 10/25/2014 10:58:44 AM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

A school shooting is a sign of an epidemic...a larger problem that must be addressed.

But acts of violence against soldiers and police officers is nothing more than a coincidence of “lone wolves” out there and not a sign that terrorism is inside our borders.

Liberalism on display, folks!


14 posted on 10/25/2014 11:31:32 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
On C-SPAN3 this morning there was a law professor talking about treaties between the US government and Indian tribes. At one point he showed a photo of Lone Wolf, either a Kiowa or Comanche (he couldn't remember which), whose lawsuit which reached the Supreme Court in 1903 had an important impact on how the government dealt with the tribes.

That Lone Wolf was not a Muslim.

15 posted on 10/25/2014 11:44:16 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Harper isn’t cowering impotently behind the Obama administration's term of art, "workplace violence." A purely political artifice made ghastly because it defames the victims and the heroes who acted in the face of Nidal Hasan's terroristic rampage.

I heard a talk show caller make an interesting point a while back. Most life insurance policies have a provision that exempts them paying for acts of war or terrorism. Had they labeled it as terrorism, could the survivors have collected? Not saying that's the administrations motivation, but it's something I hadn't thought of before and never heard mentioned.

16 posted on 10/25/2014 12:28:40 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson