Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Online Abortion Class Undermines Intellectual Diversity at University of California
Townhall.com ^ | October 23, 2014 | Gabriella Hoffman

Posted on 10/23/2014 10:15:21 AM PDT by Kaslin

The University of California (UC) system is one of the most reputed institutions of higher learning here in the United States. Boasting 10 campuses stretching from Davis in Northern California to San Diego in Southern California, the UC system is historically regarded for molding future leaders and pioneers. Unfortunately, intellectual diversity and tolerance of differing opinions are concepts largely absent in the UC system today.

UC-San Francisco (UCSF)—UC’s medical school—is one of the first universities offering a free online course on abortion. The free six-week course is titled “Abortion: Quality Care and Public Health Implications.” It is taught by Dr. Jody Steinauer, a noted pro-abortion OB/GYN and former president of Medical Students for Choice. The course started on October 13 and will conclude on November 24. It is open to the public for enrollment.

UCSF’s Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health also adds the course will fill a void in academia by teaching “ethical” ways to perform abortions. Their website notes, “The class will address abortion in the U.S. and around the world, framing the issue in a public health context. The aim of the course is to fill in the gaps left by the exclusion of abortion from mainstream curricula.”

There are six lectures comprising the online course: “Abortion in the U.S. And Around the World,” “Abortion, Professionalism, and Patient-Centered Counseling,” “Abortion in the First Trimester,” “ Abortion after the First Trimester: Obstacles to Accessing Safe Abortion in the U.S. And Worldwide,” “Overcoming Obstacles to Abortion Access," and “Early Pregnancy Loss and Course Conclusions.”

As one peruses the course syllabus, there is no mention of abortion alternatives like adoption or pregnancy crisis centers.

UCSF claims it is “committed to nurturing diversity among its faculty, staff, students and trainees and strives to create an environment that is collegial, respectful and rewarding.” Where’s UCSF’s commitment to presenting the pro-life view in this course? Sadly it’s nowhere to be found.

The UC system’s bias in favor of abortion and left-leaning views should not come as a surprise. This is the same university system that welcomes pro-abortion students at UC-Santa Barbara who call pro-lifers “domestic terrorists” for displaying images of aborted babies. Moreover, most UC campuses—including 91 of America’s top 200 universities—have school-sponsored abortion healthcare plans.

As a 2012 graduate of University of California, San Diego, I cannot help but shudder at the thought of taxpayer dollars being funneled to an online course that aims to brainwash future UC graduates. Fellow UC students will solely hear the pro-abortion side and be unaware of abortion’s implications for both unborn babies and pregnant women.

What happened to upholding the university motto Fiat lux? How come alternative views are continually left in the dark? A light needs to be shined on this blatant abuse of taxpayer funds and disregard for intellectual diversity.

If students wish to shine a light on liberal bias or present alternative views on campus, I encourage them to contact Leadership Institute’s Campus Leadership Program and report bias to Campus Reform.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: California
KEYWORDS: abortion; california; collegesandunis; prolife; uc

1 posted on 10/23/2014 10:15:21 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And the first woman to die from a DIY abortion at the hands of a student of this course?
What then?


2 posted on 10/23/2014 10:19:56 AM PDT by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Making fools of themselves to please militant man-hating feminazis.


3 posted on 10/23/2014 10:45:29 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouchthatonehurt

They don’t count, since they don’t represent any profit to the abortion mills.


4 posted on 10/23/2014 6:29:14 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
From the article: What happened to upholding the university motto "Fiat lux"?

Hmm... How quaint. A reference from the Bible.

"dixitque Deus fiat lux et facta est lux."

"And God said, Let there be light: and there was light."

The baby-killing atheists must have missed this one.

5 posted on 10/24/2014 10:59:54 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

If it’s California, then the motto should be: “Let there be light in the loafers.”


6 posted on 10/24/2014 2:00:07 PM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reg45
reg45 suggested: “Let there be light in the loafers.”

"Fiat lux in calciatibus."

7 posted on 10/24/2014 9:40:08 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson