Nobel Peace Prize goes to Malala Yousafzay, Kailash Satyarthi (Excellent decision)

In a nod to the efforts to protect children, the Nobel Prize committee awarded its Peace Prize to two activists focused on the defense of children’s rights — Malala Yousefzai of Pakistan and Kailash Satyarthi of India. The committee had reportedly had considered Pope Francis, Edward Snowden, and a handful of others as the most prominent of this year’s record 278 nominees:

The pairing of a Muslim and a Hindu was no coincidence, either, but a message to extremists in both camps. The committee made that explicit in their announcement:

What makes this interesting is that the Nobel committee had the opportunity last year to consider Malala. They turned her down in favor of the still-obscure Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), which had been tasked with finding and destroying Syria’s chemical weapons. Like their award in 2009 to Barack Obama, the decision was aspirational, since the work had just begun, and it was as big a failure for the Nobel committee in the end, too. Malala had been working to oppose Taliban oppression of education for women before the Syrian chemical weapons issue arose in the summer of 2013, and had survived a bullet in the face and continued in defiance of the threat to her life. Why the committee waited for a year, and then paired her up with a Hindu to score their own points, will likely be a question posed to the Norwegians on the panel.

That’s not to say that Satyarthi is unworthy, though. He has campaigned against child labor and child abuse in India for decades, some of which amounts to de facto slavery. A PBS profile of Satyarthi reports that he is credited with saving tens of thousands of children from “bonded labor” in India, and helped rehabilitate them back to self-sufficiency. That profile dates back to 2005, though, which again raises the question of why the Nobel committee overlooked him while giving awards to Obama and Jimmy Carter, among others.

Here at the Vatican, the reporters in the press office had waited with some anticipation for this decision. Most here felt that getting a public acknowledgment of runner-up status would be as close as Pope Francis would get, given the committee’s politics regarding contraception and marriage, among other issues. A few speculated that the questionable string of recipients over the last few years, including OPCW and Obama, might incentivize the Nobel committee to attempt to piggyback on the pontiff’s global popularity. Most of us thought such an award was unlikely; one reporter joked in English, “I’ll bet every woman in the room a kiss that Pope Francis doesn’t win the Nobel Prize,” which so far he has not attempted to collect, although I did congratulate him on his strategy. “It’s all I’ve got,” he responded with a laugh.

This time, the Nobel committee got it right, even though it was tardy in doing so for both of its recipients. Maybe the embarrassments of the last several years has begun to convince the Nobel committee to stick to actual peace efforts rather than attempting to play global politics.

It’s globalism that loves child labor and slavery.

They’ve been dealing in slaves, drugs and gold for centuries and they continue as the leaders in those fields to this day. Present-day China is nothing more than a big factory producing goods for globalist businesses. Globalism is and has always been fixated to the point of being fascinated by lowering their labor costs to as close to nothing as possible. They would prefer that all their “sheeple” work simply for three hots and a cot.

(read more about it, if interested by researching the British East India Company).

Now they take what they have created, “third world” nations and child labor, and use that (!) as an argument for globalist state-run education.

They don’t say globalist state-run education, but it’s certainly implied - because when poor folks children are given school educations, it’s in public schools.

In America, the grabbing at control of educational cirriculum via school funding goes back as far as George Peabody, American front man for UK financial elites. He donated large amounts of his assets (including some agriculteral debt securities which later wound up defaulting - kind of has a familiar ring to it) to primary school education. It’s the INVOLVEMENT that elites are purchasing when they operate through their “foundations”; that involvement, by the early 1900’s, was so influential that they essentially controlled what was taught in American primary schools, since those mostly take their cues from the university system, where the financial elites are involved to the point that they essentially “belong to” the elites. One convenience this affords the elites is the history cirriculum, which they ensure is sanitized of their devestating influence on world affairs. Instead of an accurate portrayal of themselves as evil traders in slaves and drugs, operating traitorous espionage networks, instigators of famines and wars, etc., they make sure that “history” (as told by their minions) depicts them as simple benevolent bankers and businessmen. Since the sheeple are fed this tripe from an early age, they mostly sop it up and believe it in pathetically sappy fashion.

The key part of globalist state-run education is that it removes the Biblical foundation of the sheeple’s education; this has been an essential step in “new world order”, or the global elite financiers’ goal of stomping out true Biblical Christianity. The globalists are very happy to keep corrupted Christian churches in their employ, and very happy to deal with any sort of false religion, i.e., pagan or heathen. It’s the true Biblical belief that they see as the biggest threat to themselves.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.