Posted on 10/08/2014 12:49:48 PM PDT by wagglebee
To donate vital organs, a donor must be dead. Tough this is known as the “dead donor rule,” I have been warning that utilitarian bioethicists and transplant medical professionals want to shatter the DDR to permit killing living living profoundly cognitively disabled patients for their organs.
Now, we see what appears to me to be a push poll type question in a study measuring popular support for such a change in the law.
A push poll seeks to obtain a desired answer by the way the question is framed. Here is the question from “Abandoning the Dead Donor Rule?” in the Journal of Medical Ethics:
Jason has been in a very bad car accident. He suffered a severe head injury and is now in the hospital. As a result of the injury, Jason is completely unconscious.
He cannot hear or feel anything, cannot remember or think about anything, he is not aware of anything, and his condition is irreversible. Jason will never wake up.
As we have seen in recent stories of awake and aware patients diagnosed in a persistent vegetative state–and perhaps, the Jahi McMath brain death case–this question sets up a false premise. Few, if any, cases are this clear cut,this sure. Indeed, the more we learn about the brain and consciousness, the less we know–as demonstrated by the proven brain interactivity in some patients thought to be completely unaware.
Thus, it seems to me that the question was posed in this unrealistic way to obtain a desired result of allowing the harvest.
Back to the question:
He also cannot breathe without mechanical support, but is on a breathing machine that keeps his lungs working. Without the machine, Jason’s heart and all other organs would stop within minutes. Although he will never wake up and cannot breathe without the support of the machine, Jason is still biologically alive.
In such scenarios, a patient can already be a donor by having life support removed, and IF – it doesn’t always happen as expected – he goes into cardiac arrest, be declared dead a few minutes later and obtain organs.
But that important fact isn’t mentioned in the question posed:
Before the injury, Jason wanted to be an organ donor. The organs will function best if they are removed while Jason’s heart is still beating and while he is still on the breathing machine. If the organs are removed while Jason is still on the machine, he would die from the removal of organs (in other words, the surgery would cause Jason’s biological death).
The question then asks how many people think that would be okay, and based on the push poll nature of the question, obtain a majority support for killing for organs.
Moreover, were the dead donor rule be killed, the patients harvested would not be limited to the relatively few cases such as described above.
Polling is like statistics, you can make them say anything.
LifeNews.com Note: Wesley J. Smith, J.D., is a special consultant to the Center for Bioethics and Culture and a bioethics attorney who blogs at Human Exeptionalism.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
If you are hurt call 9-1-1 and hope the ambulance arrives before the organ truck
![](http://i47.tinypic.com/15mn2hx.jpg";;)
Had a relative tell me that, “the majority of Americans thought Terri Schiavo should die”. I was shocked that this relative would quote a poll as to a human being being condemned to death. What a slippery slope.
This “poll” doesn’t surprise me.
Sad
A good reason to not fill out a donor card, that way you don’t go in for something nonfatal and wind up getting whacked for your organs!
The EXEMPT Princes:
"Your children's organs are for us, our families and staff.
and THAT is why WE .... are EXEMPT."
If this goes through I’m gonna have Jim Beam sponsor me.
When I’m done with this liver and kidneys I’ll get new ones from a recently “Whacked” donor.
Sadly, I have first hand experience with this. You are not kidding.
Just a word to the wise: It’s fine to be an organ donor, but make sure you don’t check the “live organ donor” box. Especially if you have a family to support.
I’m safe, everything is slap wore out!!
ping
“organs” doesn’t mean just “organs”. It is your entire body. Bones, skin, tendons, collagen.... They use “organs” as all encompassing.
Simple market-based solution; allow people or their families to sell their organs upon death.
“Big Oil” ain’t got nothin’ on “Big Obolacare” in the greed department.
When the option first became available to sign a card to go with your drivers’ license, indicating that you were willing to be an organ donor, I signed right away and told my Dad. He said he would never do that. He said, “What if they take my organ and I’m not totally dead yet?” I thought, “wow, are you paranoid”.
Now, as in so many things, Dad is looking pretty wise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.