Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High court denies gay marriage appeals [legal immediately in IN, OK, UT, VA and WI]
AP ^ | 10/06/2014 | Mark Sherman

Posted on 10/06/2014 7:07:01 AM PDT by GIdget2004

he Supreme Court has turned away appeals from five states seeking to prohibit same-sex marriages, paving the way for an immediate expansion of gay and lesbian unions.

The justices on Monday did not comment in rejecting appeals from Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin.

The court's order immediately ends delays on marriage in those states. Couples in six other states should be able to get married in short order.

That would make same-sex marriage legal in 30 states and the District of Columbia.

But the justices have left unresolved for now the question of same-sex marriage nationwide.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigstory.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Indiana; US: Oklahoma; US: Utah; US: Virginia; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: gay; gaymarriage; gaystapo; homosexualagenda; homsexualagenda; johnroberts; judicialactivism; justiceroberts; lavendermafia; marriage; mittromney; moralabsolutes; obama; roberts; romney; romneyagenda; romneymarriage; samesexmarriage; supremecourt; ussc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-212 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2014 7:07:01 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Dead culture.


2 posted on 10/06/2014 7:08:53 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
Its up to God to restore the natural order of things.

And restore it he will.

3 posted on 10/06/2014 7:09:49 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Sodom revisited.


4 posted on 10/06/2014 7:09:55 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Amen ... Thy Will Be Done, Lord.


5 posted on 10/06/2014 7:11:28 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

No Surprise Roberts himself is a FAGGOT Lover. I DESPISE THESE 9 BASTARDS!


6 posted on 10/06/2014 7:12:35 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Supreme Court = Owned


7 posted on 10/06/2014 7:14:14 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Article V Marriage Amendment needs 36 states to propose, 38 states to ratify.

There are 38 states in support now.


8 posted on 10/06/2014 7:14:35 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

I just can’t wait for the flood of homos at the local courthouse.


9 posted on 10/06/2014 7:15:43 AM PDT by tgusa (gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

The Founders never intended for the courts to wield this kind of backdoor legislative power.


10 posted on 10/06/2014 7:17:24 AM PDT by Iron Munro (We can make it work with only one square per restroom visit -- Sheryl Crow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

Apparently the morons in black robes learned absolutely NOTHING from four decades of turmoil over Roe v. Wade.


11 posted on 10/06/2014 7:17:27 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
There are 38 states in support now.

You think there are 38 states that would ratify a Marriage Amendment? Now? Maybe 10 years ago, but not a chance today.

12 posted on 10/06/2014 7:17:28 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Sad.


13 posted on 10/06/2014 7:18:20 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

That’s for sure. We have become a country and a culture without a compass. Its a free for all.


14 posted on 10/06/2014 7:18:41 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Disgraceful, a lot more disgraceful to bring kids up in this and someone like the Russians look like the moral ones.


15 posted on 10/06/2014 7:19:44 AM PDT by BeadCounter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Wow. So they let lower court judges overturn the will of the people?


16 posted on 10/06/2014 7:20:57 AM PDT by Girlene (Hey NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

What I don’t like is that:

a) a state of legislators with the approval of voters pass a ban on gay marriage.

b) a special interest group challenges it in court.

c) a liberal judge upholds the challenge.

d) a series of appeals courts also uphold the challenge while largely kicking the can up to the Supreme Court.

e) The Supreme Court then refuses to hear the appeals.

Notice who got left out of the process of legalizing gay marriage in most of these states? That’s right. It’s the voters and their elected representatives who, in most cases, expressed their disapproval by passing the bans to begin with.

Note one major difference between this and the judicial fiat of abortion. In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court upheld (agree with it or not) a constitutional right to an abortion which then put the onus on the states to overturn incrementally.

Here, the SCOTUS has NOT ruled that gays have a right to be married, only that they would not rule on a ban of such behavior.

I have no argument with the states that passed gay marriage through the vote of the people or the state legislative process but to say that conservative states now have legal gay marriage because the bans of such were denied by federal court is turning representative democracy on its head.


17 posted on 10/06/2014 7:22:36 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (Every time you say no to a liberal, you make the Baby Barack cry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
There are 38 states in support now.

Maybe I'm reading this wrong but I don't think there are 38 states in support of gay marriage. I think those 38 states had the will of the people overturned.

18 posted on 10/06/2014 7:22:38 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

“Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin.”

3 solid red states, close to 4 red states and a purple state.

Utah?


19 posted on 10/06/2014 7:22:41 AM PDT by BeadCounter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Well, that count is less than clear. Furthermore, some of those are LibTard states that in no way will restrict this. They will expand it.

I’ve said and I say again ... an Article V convention would be an unmitigated disaster ... for Conservatism.


20 posted on 10/06/2014 7:24:09 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-212 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson