Skip to comments.
O'Reilly: Does President Obama Have the Guts to Raise An 'Anti-Terror Force' to Fight ISIS?
Fox Insider ^
| SEptember 22, 2014
| Fox News Insider
Posted on 09/22/2014 7:37:10 PM PDT by lbryce
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
O'Reilly is stupid, naive and bobing for ratings points. The days when putting Obama's gonads to the test, to challenge him publicly that if he doesn't do so and so he'll be proving he has no gonads, by effectively putting his masculinity and leadership on the line, as if his mind isn't already made up.
Does anyone really believe that Obama has America's best interest at heart on any subject? Does any American actually believe he has any intention on improving America's lot in the world? The political situation today, is more or less the way Obama has been plannin it to be. American weakened, the Islamic powers in ascendancy. Israel marginalized to fear and loathing. and all that Obama has succeeded in doing going in his direction. And now you want to know if ISIS can be dealt with? For God's sake ISIS has beheaded three American. I say, he's ahead of the game.
1
posted on
09/22/2014 7:37:10 PM PDT
by
lbryce
To: lbryce
He does not want to fight isil.
2
posted on
09/22/2014 7:43:38 PM PDT
by
ryan71
(The Partisans)
To: lbryce
To Obama, ISIS is the anti-terror force.
3
posted on
09/22/2014 7:43:55 PM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Manchuria Called. They want their Candidate Back!)
To: lbryce
Bottom line: O’Reilly wants to form a 25,000 man mercenary force, lead by US officers and paid for by Saudi Arabia.
He did not elaborate on who will order this force into action, but one thing is for sure. He who pays the piper will call the tune.
4
posted on
09/22/2014 7:49:14 PM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: lbryce
Yeah I really trust this guy .........
5
posted on
09/22/2014 7:54:20 PM PDT
by
boycott
To: lbryce
Mercenaries worked out so well for the Romans, after all.
6
posted on
09/22/2014 7:55:32 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: lbryce
"Let me repeat: Even if the USA trains Syrian moderates and gives them weapons, they will not be able to defeat the terrorists." I don't think muslim moderates have the will to fight ISIS unless they are directly led by non-muslims.
In the end, "moderate" muslims are unmanned by the jihadists. I think they see the jihadist as better muslims and therefor better men than themselves. They go weak in the knees at a real fire-breathing jihadist who really believes in Islam.
The fact that they are "moderate" already tells you they don't have what it takes to defeat the psychopaths. Islam has a bias toward crazy. There is no brightline separating teh moderate from the crazy, on the contrary, the game is rigged in favor of crazy.
7
posted on
09/22/2014 7:58:06 PM PDT
by
marron
To: lbryce
Hey, Bill O’Reilly, Obama is a MUSLIM. Why do you think he's backing Sunni terrorists vs. Shi'ite terrorists? It's all about ISLAM, Bill. Obama is a Muslim terrorist in-charge of the American government and he's out to destroy the country, aided and abetted by the Washington, DC power brokers. Obama is guaranteeing a bigger and better 9-11 attack by his [in]security policies. It would be interesting to conjecture a huge attack on NYC. Their Marxist mayor is in bed with the Islamists and can’t get the required security clearance to work with security agencies. Should NYC get struck, what would Bill de Blasio and Barack Obama do? Probably blame Bush and Christians. NYC residents might not buy this spin if enough New Yorkers die. I dunno.
To: ryan71
Obama didn’t act to defeat ISIS.
He acted to shut his critics up.
9
posted on
09/22/2014 8:30:52 PM PDT
by
Iron Munro
("If you want to test a man's character, give him power." -- Abraham Lincoln)
To: lbryce
Obama isn’t man enough to write his name in the snow, if you get my meaning.
10
posted on
09/22/2014 8:37:57 PM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: Iron Munro
11
posted on
09/22/2014 8:53:52 PM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: lbryce
Barack is Pro-Islamist and has a hard on for Islamic theocratic rule.
Not gonna go after the ‘evil’ muslims. They are muslim brothers of the rest of the muslims.
Barack even gave Osama Bin Laden an Islamic funeral.
12
posted on
09/22/2014 9:00:21 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Hey Obama: If Islamic State is not Islamic, then why did you give Osama Bin Laden a muslim funeral?)
To: lbryce
McReilly is one funny lefty and doesn’t comprehend that President Obama is irrelevant in matters of war. Our generals will continue the air strikes and other actions. Obama will agree with whatever they do behind closed doors while issuing more nonsense in speeches to appease his hysterical Democrats.
13
posted on
09/22/2014 9:08:06 PM PDT
by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
To: lbryce
Obumbler ISN'T going to do ANYTHING.
He will PONTIFICATE until your ears fall off... but he WILL NOT take serious ACTION.
To: lbryce
I can answer that question with one word......NO
15
posted on
09/22/2014 9:27:40 PM PDT
by
coincheck
(Time is Short, Salvation is for Today)
To: lbryce
O’Reilly got really huffy when a couple of his guests tried to tell him how stupid his mercenary idea was. Maybe he’s been reading old issues of Soldier Of Fortune.
To: boycott
And to think that he ended up in the WH. America is beyond stupid.
The guy on the left would’ve probably done a better job as prez.
17
posted on
09/22/2014 10:46:40 PM PDT
by
353FMG
To: lbryce
Judge Janine said the other day Isis is already here in the U.S, they’re going to strike us hard and no matter where you live you are not safe. If you think the government has you covered, you’re wrong. Obama won’t do anything.
She had on a team of experts; ex-generals, ex defense etc who all agreed.
Scary.
18
posted on
09/22/2014 10:53:28 PM PDT
by
patriot08
(NATIVE TEXAN (girl type))
To: MasterGunner01; All
Somehow I don’t think the muzzies will hit NY again.
What if the cities they named to strike are to throw us off.
What if they wiped out smaller cities across the U.S simultaneously?
19
posted on
09/22/2014 11:01:59 PM PDT
by
patriot08
(NATIVE TEXAN (girl type))
To: patriot08
Of course, you have a good point. But, the Muslim world has no idea where Des Moines, IA is or that it exists. The Muslims have heard of NYC, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Atlanta, Miami, Chicago, and Washington, DC. I think these are the ones they'd still want to target.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson