Posted on 09/22/2014 7:37:10 PM PDT by lbryce
In tonight's Talking Points Memo, Bill O'Reilly said he is tired of the phony rhetoric surrounding the ISIS terror threat, tired of hearing the phrase "boots on the ground" and tired of being misled by the Obama administration.
'We Can't Be Waiting for Other Countries': King Says It's in Our 'National Interest' to Hit ISIS in Syria and Iraq
'God, Get Me Home to My Girls': Navy SEAL Shot 27 Times by Al Qaeda Tells His Amazing Survival Story
"Here is the truth: Syrian moderates cannot defeat the ISIS terror group," O'Reilly said. "Let me repeat: Even if the USA trains Syrian moderates and gives them weapons, they will not be able to defeat the terrorists."
"The Factor" host then laid out a strategy for how the U.S. should deal with ISIS, which would require ground forces.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnewsinsider.com ...
Does anyone really believe that Obama has America's best interest at heart on any subject? Does any American actually believe he has any intention on improving America's lot in the world? The political situation today, is more or less the way Obama has been plannin it to be. American weakened, the Islamic powers in ascendancy. Israel marginalized to fear and loathing. and all that Obama has succeeded in doing going in his direction. And now you want to know if ISIS can be dealt with? For God's sake ISIS has beheaded three American. I say, he's ahead of the game.
He does not want to fight isil.
To Obama, ISIS is the anti-terror force.
He did not elaborate on who will order this force into action, but one thing is for sure. He who pays the piper will call the tune.
Mercenaries worked out so well for the Romans, after all.
I don't think muslim moderates have the will to fight ISIS unless they are directly led by non-muslims.
In the end, "moderate" muslims are unmanned by the jihadists. I think they see the jihadist as better muslims and therefor better men than themselves. They go weak in the knees at a real fire-breathing jihadist who really believes in Islam.
The fact that they are "moderate" already tells you they don't have what it takes to defeat the psychopaths. Islam has a bias toward crazy. There is no brightline separating teh moderate from the crazy, on the contrary, the game is rigged in favor of crazy.
Obama didn’t act to defeat ISIS.
He acted to shut his critics up.
Obama isn’t man enough to write his name in the snow, if you get my meaning.
Well said.
Barack is Pro-Islamist and has a hard on for Islamic theocratic rule.
Not gonna go after the ‘evil’ muslims. They are muslim brothers of the rest of the muslims.
Barack even gave Osama Bin Laden an Islamic funeral.
McReilly is one funny lefty and doesn’t comprehend that President Obama is irrelevant in matters of war. Our generals will continue the air strikes and other actions. Obama will agree with whatever they do behind closed doors while issuing more nonsense in speeches to appease his hysterical Democrats.
He will PONTIFICATE until your ears fall off... but he WILL NOT take serious ACTION.
I can answer that question with one word......NO
O’Reilly got really huffy when a couple of his guests tried to tell him how stupid his mercenary idea was. Maybe he’s been reading old issues of Soldier Of Fortune.
And to think that he ended up in the WH. America is beyond stupid.
The guy on the left would’ve probably done a better job as prez.
Judge Janine said the other day Isis is already here in the U.S, they’re going to strike us hard and no matter where you live you are not safe. If you think the government has you covered, you’re wrong. Obama won’t do anything.
She had on a team of experts; ex-generals, ex defense etc who all agreed.
Scary.
Somehow I don’t think the muzzies will hit NY again.
What if the cities they named to strike are to throw us off.
What if they wiped out smaller cities across the U.S simultaneously?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.