Posted on 08/13/2014 8:01:29 AM PDT by Kaslin
Drones -- unmanned flying machines -- will soon fill our skies. They conjure up fears, especially among some of my fellow libertarians, of spying and death from above.
These fears aren't groundless. President Bush approved the use of armed drones against suspected terrorists overseas, and President Obama vastly increased their use. Drones have killed thousands of people in places such as Pakistan and Yemen, countries against which we have not declared war.
Drones keep getting more sophisticated. The Air Force is now developing what it calls MAVs, Micro Air Vehicles, tiny drones that can quietly search for an individual terrorist and then kill him with explosives or even incapacitate him with chemicals.
So far, America has killed with drones only outside America. Sen. Rand Paul (R, Kentucky) famously filibustered Obama's nomination of John Brennan to head the CIA, demanding that Americans first receive clarification on the government's policy regarding use of lethal drones within the U.S. Finally, the attorney general responded, "Does the president have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil? The answer to that question is no."
Good for Sen. Paul. Technology itself is not evil, but what government does with it should be determined by clear rules.
The next controversy will center on the increasing use of "civilian" drones. Researching a documentary, "Policing America," I was surprised to learn that I could buy a "personal" drone for only $500. For another $700, my TV staff added a camera to it. These are terrific devices. Vacationers use them to videotape family trips, farmers to check crops, police to search for missing people.
Soon, most everyone might have one. In the six months since I began researching "Policing America," drone prices have dropped sharply. Recently we bought one -- admittedly, a flimsy one -- for just $50. That includes a camera.
Our too-big government will try to quash this innovation. This week the Wall Street Journal reported that government standards "are at least four years away" and quoted a bureaucrat who said, "The incremental approach is essential."
So the FAA sends "cease and desist" orders to restaurants that use drones to deliver food to remote areas, realtors who show off houses, movie makers and journalists who use drones to get aerial footage of disasters, protests, celebrity weddings, etc.
"Commercial use" is illegal, says government (regulators don't like business). Fortunately, some entrepreneurs ignore the restrictions. Martin Scorsese used a drone to videotape parts of "Wolf of Wall Street." It's great when people practice civil disobedience against idiot regulators.
The FAA is right to worry about air safety, but that can be handled less intrusively with rules that ban drones near airports.
Of course, private drone use can get creepy. A woman in Connecticut recently attacked a drone operator at a beach because she was angry about being spied upon.
Like a good libertarian, Sen. Paul realizes that ambiguous property rights are the real problem. He jokes that his neighbor has a drone: "If I see it over my property, my shotgun's coming out."
America already has peeping-Tom laws. I can look through my neighbor's window, but I can't legally get my stepladder and spy over his fence. State courts will work this stuff out.
As usual, the market will probably produce the best solutions, just as algorithmic anti-spam programs proved more effective than useless anti-spam laws.
An aerospace engineer emailed me that he's created a Drone Shield you can use to spot unwelcome intrusions.
That will get trickier as drones become smaller and quieter -- I've seen video of new ones that resemble hummingbirds. But detection technology will improve as well. That constant feedback and competition is how all technology advances.
Technology itself is rarely a bad thing. What matters is the endless power of the market to refine and improve how we use it.
If government will just relax its regulatory chokehold, private citizens will find safe ways to deliver food, rescue lost cats and fill the skies with happy new possibilities.
Democrats are sprouting wings?
The point I would like to make is that the word ‘drone’ is being misused.
How come?
What isn’t said is that the immediate outgrowth to the abusive use of drones in the US is a booming black market in anti-drone technology. Because drones come in many sizes that fly at many altitudes, the same needs apply to anti-drone tech.
It might use electronic countermeasures to disrupt or hack the guidance signal to the drone; or it might simply ram the drone, or fly into its engine; or shoot a projectile or sticky polymer string; it might explode next to the drone.
It might be a .50 caliber rifle on the ground; use a green light laser that can burn a hole in cinder block with just a few watts of power; etc. Whatever works.
Wow, we thought the same thing. I read “mindless drones” and thought instantly of those ilk who support the POSoTUSIC. Then I read the article and when I finished, I still couldn’t stop thinking of the supporters and how aptly the title suits them.
“....Pakistan and Yemen, countries against which we have not declared war.”
.
When was the last time that the US formally declared war to any country?
How many hunters are there across America?
Just sayin.........
Hmmm
On December 11, 1941 the US declared War upon Germany. The vote was: 88-0 in the Senate and 393-0 in the HouseSource
I know.
All I was trying to say is that we have committed much violence, have spilled much blood, sacrificed many American lives and wasted much of our treasure without ever declaring war.
You do know though, that most wars were started by the democrats, don’t you?
I have been out playing Disc Golf and flying my QUADCOPTERS.
Everyone calls my QUADCOPTER a ‘drone’. It is not.
Drone used to mean a towed craft, or a remotely piloted craft.
Now we have UAV’s that fly themselves. People are calling them drones as well.
I guess what I was trying to say is that the word DRONE is being applied to all these different categories, which seems to be misusing the word. I guess I should just accept that ‘drone’ is now being used like the word ‘robot’.
What does the word ‘drone’ mean to you ?
I will come back later when I am fully awake
drone (verb) To make humming sounds
I wasn’t full awake when I first made my comment.
Later, when I was (weakly) trying to back it up, I knew I had put my foot in my mouth.
Perhaps I should have argued that the title “Mindless Drones” doesn’t make sense.
Anyway, it isn’t important enough to waste more of your time or mine on it.
I’ll just concede that everything from a bee to a computerized self-guided cruise missile is a ‘drone’.
Life will be easier that way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.