Posted on 08/09/2014 6:52:41 PM PDT by lbryce
You Tube:AMMO ALERT! SB35 Will FORCE CA Residents to Obtain A 'Permit' to Buy Ammo!
Here they go again! Staunch anti-2nd Amendment Democrat, Senator Kevin De León and his fellow leftists are at it again. This time they've got your ammo in their sights. DeLeon, from Los Angeles, is one of the most ardent opponents of the 2nd Amendment. His latest bill, SB53, is nothing less than a back door ban on the 2nd Amendment using ammo as a proxy.
This bill will violate your Constitutional Rights by penalizing citizens who wish to exercise their basic natural right of Self Defense as an American. If SB 53 passes, you will be forced to pay a fee to the CA Department of Justice in order to obtain a permit to buy what you can legally purchase now without one. You will be stripped of your freedom to purchase ammo online by an ever expanding government.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
CORRECTION:doesn’t mean the government is NOT going to be taken over.
Another attack by an anti-American scumbag. I bet he has a statue of Obama on his dashboard.
Three simple rules for buying ammo:
1) Always buy ammo in bulk.
2) Always buy more than you think you need.
3) Always be 2,000 rounds ahead of “running low” is possible.
They need to figure a way to disarm citizens before they can complete their Fundamental Change of America.
Yup. The next step is when they decide that possession of unpermitted (legacy) ammo is a crime, although that may already be in the bill. Else, how will they be able to identify ammo purchased illegally?
Three simple rules for buying ammo:
1) Always buy ammo in bulk.
2) Always buy more than you think you need.
3) Always be 2,000 rounds ahead of “running low” is possible.
piker...
they are trying the europe approach. not only permits/registering guns, but needing permits to buy ammo. they also then place limits on how much you can buy, and how much you can have at home.
Arms includes ammo. The 2d amendment says that citizens keep and bear arms. One is not armed without bullets. It would be like considering the sheath an arm and not the sword within the sheath. That would be
Yes this is major. The NRA will be on this. It is similar to someone with a dishwasher being required to have a permit to buy soap. Wait! That happened in Spokane.
The government already has been taken over. It occurred in 2008.
I bet he keeps it somewhere dark.
Another commie pig, bottom feeding politician coming up with a new way to steal OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY.
To the ignorant and uninformed "low information voters". The TEA as in TEA Party stands for TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY! Comprende amigo?
Will the same rules apply to gang members of MS-13?
They don’t pay taxes. Fulfillment for Psychopaths in the Gov is making people pay for their own demise.
***His latest bill, SB53, is nothing less than a back door ban on the 2nd Amendment using ammo as a proxy.***
And to think, back in 1982 the citizens of California REJECTED Prop 15 which would have banned handgun sales in California.
Since that day the politicians have been working overtime to find ways around the will of the people, one nibble at a time.
Magazine ammo limits
Metallic content of the frame and ammo
Excess redundant safety features
Drop tests
Longer waiting periods
More hoops to jump through are coming.
And that’s just for handguns!
Remember when the claim was, “We only want to register handguns! Long guns will not be affected!”
http://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_15,_Handgun_Registration_Initiative_%281982%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_California
No, under a hardship rule they will be able to opt out..
And unfortunately, many will pay for their own demise.
They get amnesty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.