Somebody get me clear on this language.
Doesn’t ‘deportation’ refer to a revocation of a residency ‘status’? That is, doesn’t a ‘deportee’ need to have some sort of prior approval to reside in the US, which is then revoked by the deportation procedure?
These people have no rights we need respect (humanitarian, yes, but legal, no). Crickey, I sound like Roger B. Taney).
They are invaders pure and simple. We don’t owe them anything except a C-130 flight back to their country of origin.
Sounds excessive to me. How about a one-liter bottle of water and, for directions, a finger pointing South.
“We don’t owe them anything except a C-130 flight back to their country of origin.”
They walked here, they can walk back.
The word deportation is being used loosely for “get their a33e3 back over the border.”
We don’t owe them a flight on a C130. All we owe them is a trip to the border that they crossed illegally and a boot in the ass across it. I’s Mexico’s problem for allowing them to come into their country.
Screw that, take them to the border and let them get home the same way they got here.