Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

David Brooks: Obama 'Impeachment Is Obviously Cloud Cuckoo Land'
Breitbart TV ^ | July 11, 2014 | Jeff Poor

Posted on 07/12/2014 12:10:35 PM PDT by EveningStar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: ifinnegan

That’s exactly right, and that goes for all of these so-called journalists that smear Palin


21 posted on 07/12/2014 1:12:08 PM PDT by snappahead (if your gonna be dumb, you better be tough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Recently stumbled upon a PBS television program from the mid '80s with Milton Friedman on YouTube which featured a young David Brooks. Young Brooks, described as a Social Democrat, was just as misguided then as he is now. Friedman schools young Brooks.

Tyranny of the Status Quo with Milton Friedman

22 posted on 07/12/2014 1:15:34 PM PDT by AHerald ("Do not fear, only believe." - Mark 5:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Oops. The video link in my previous post (#22) to you was incorrect. Here is the correct link:

Milton Friedman - Tyranny of the Status Quo - Part 1 - Beneficiaries

23 posted on 07/12/2014 1:18:59 PM PDT by AHerald ("Do not fear, only believe." - Mark 5:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Mark Shields is still around? I think he pretty much invented the term "chickenhawk" back in the '80s. I bet he can't stand Brooks!

I miss Bob Novak.

24 posted on 07/12/2014 1:25:10 PM PDT by Forgotten Amendments (Peace On Earth! Purity of Essence! McCain/Ripper 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Cloud Cuckoo Land?

Unfortunately only in today’s Liberal controlled world. Just reverse the roles and parties, if Sarah Palin, or any other conservative, was doing the things Obama was doing s/he would not only have been impeached but would now be residing in a cell in Leavenworth.

But that’s not how it is, Mr. Obama because of his party, his skin color and his far left politics is immune to the remedy the constitution allows for actions such as his.


25 posted on 07/12/2014 1:29:50 PM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

David Brooks is a known asshole.

From: http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/31/the-obligatory-david-brooks-really-impressed-with-obamas-pants-post/

That first encounter is still vivid in Brooks’s mind. “I remember distinctly an image of–we were sitting on his couches, and I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant,” Brooks says, “and I’m thinking, a) he’s going to be president and b) he’ll be a very good president.” In the fall of 2006, two days after Obama’s The Audacity of Hope hit bookstores, Brooks published a glowing Times column. The headline was “Run, Barack, Run.”…


26 posted on 07/12/2014 1:30:07 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (This is known as "bad luck". - Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Taking the constitution seriously = “Cloud cuckoo land” in the rarefied atmosphere of the Beltway.


27 posted on 07/12/2014 1:33:35 PM PDT by denydenydeny (Admiration of absolute government is proportionate to the contempt one has for others.-Tocqueville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
Taking the constitution seriously = “Cloud cuckoo land” in the rarefied atmosphere of the Beltway.

Only there?

28 posted on 07/12/2014 1:36:29 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

“Secretary General of the UN(azis) , perhaps? It’s been mentioned before ...and he’d fit right In there”

The Secretary of the UN may not be from one of the permanent members of the Security Council.


29 posted on 07/12/2014 1:39:00 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

30 posted on 07/12/2014 1:39:11 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

And the president of the USA ( or his daddy) may not be from Kenya or Indonesia, either.


31 posted on 07/12/2014 1:41:50 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Run, Barack, Run
32 posted on 07/12/2014 2:21:37 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

33 posted on 07/12/2014 2:36:59 PM PDT by JPG ("So sue me". OK, we will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

But impeachment was the only serious solution for Nixon.

Can anyone get quotes from liberal dinosaurs about Nixon’s unforgivable crimes. And can anyone find even one article calling impeachment frivolous or ridiculous.

Finally, how many Republicans joined in on the call to impeach.

How can these two-faced bigots ever call anyone a hypocrite?


34 posted on 07/12/2014 2:44:55 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: EveningStar

The same crowd laughed at Paula Jones too. There are no consequences to being wrong if you toe the party line.

Brooks isn’t even a Republican-he’s loves government at its present size.


36 posted on 07/12/2014 2:48:06 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (luke 6:38)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: selfdefense

Exactly. If she were really irrelevant, the media wouldn’t talk about her all the frickin time.


37 posted on 07/12/2014 2:49:53 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
The liberal republican, who does not know why he is a republican, cannot name one major issue where they can provide a contrast from democrats, has no core principles or ideals. Such a one is in "cloud cuckoo land", and Brooks is in the forefront. The NYT loves their pet pretend repub.
38 posted on 07/12/2014 6:18:00 PM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson