Skip to comments.Pat Sajak Asks Gay Wheel Contestant About The Woman In His Life (Gay Mafia Upset)
Posted on 06/27/2014 10:50:35 AM PDT by llevrok
A man named T.K. Klotz appeared on Wheel of Fortune tonight, and apparently put on his contestant questionnaire that he's recently engaged. Show host Pat Sajak brought up the "woman who agreed to marry" Klotz during the introductions; no, no, that's not right.
There's actually a lot to dig into here. Sajak, of course, is a right-wing extremist who just a few months ago mocked the string of athletes who, of late, have had the courage to come out as gay. There's also the overall assumption that Klotz is somehow undesirable, and all that traditional (and quickly becoming outdated) proposal process stuff. But blah blah blah, this is Pat Sajak looking stupid.
The left's war on Pat Sajak (and any celebrity who does not think like them) continues, I must say.
They want to make a big deal of that?
But we shouldn’t make a big deal if a gay guy hits on us?
There’s no way Pat could know everything about every contestant.
He asked a reasonable question.
Hang tough, Pat. Sorry they are such ... zombies.
Sound like a honest mistake
I be asking same question
Who’s the lucky lady LOL!
Timothy must be a gypsie knob polisher.
Pat is a whole lot brighter than his detractors and frankly I think he stirs them to a white hot rage for his personal amusement.
Its not hard to upset the mentally unstable. Pat is learning one has to tread carefully to avoid hurting their feelings.
Btw-I like the homage to Ed Grimley who seems like a decent man.
I think this really means that Sajak is not very politically correct and the author has his panties in a wad because of it.
Isn’t Deadspin a sports site? Is Wheel-of-fortune now considered a sport?
“this is Pat Sajak looking stupid.”
No, this is Pat Sajak looking like he still has some class, unlike most celebrities.
More gay propaganda from gay newsrooms. They have their own hitlist comparable to the “Red Channels” of old (where private citizens compiled a list of Hollywood Reds to encourage boycott of their works).
The new HUAC (Homosexualist Un-American Activities Committee) is in action.
Leftist schmucks make me sick..they actually think that same same “Marriage” is marriage..there will NEVER be no such thing. How the heck was Sajak supposed to know this guy was a fudgepacker
T.K. Klotz and his life partner P.M.S.
Yup. As I said to my spousal unit (wife may be sexist): how do you take 1000's of years language (that being marriage relationships are male/female) and within 5 or less years delete these from the culture's lexicon entirely.
But as a young person in my town said to me on a similar incident - you need to evolve, old man. (flashing back to Vietnam "re-education camps" for the elderly after the fall of Saigon)
No this was Pat Sajak making a mistake by assuming his guest was normal. If anyone is offended, let me add that I don't hate gays, I just don't think they're normal. What is normal, I hear someone ask? Simple: Marriage between a man and a woman for social, cultural, historic, legal, and biological reasons.
There’s been a number of homos I’ve seen on the show announce they’re getting “married.” I’m sure Pat cannot always detect who is a homo and who is not, but I doubt he asks their sexual identity in the questionnaires. But homos are obviously not barred from being on the show. Not enough for the homo Nazis.
Even the contestant isn’t upset with Sajak, and said that he apologized to Klotz during the break. If he isn’t upset with Sajak, why should anyone else care? They both handled an awkward situation with class. This has been a mountain made out of a molehill.
That would be profiling and you know we shan't do that any more.
Ed? Ed Grimley! Is that you?
“You’re engaged to another man? Oh......I’m sorry.......”Who Wants To Be A Buttboy?” is filming over at Studio three.”
A reasonable question for normal people.
Pat bit his tongue and didn't say that.
“It’s heterosexist, normative thinking”.
Remember when they once identified as “an alternative lifestyle”? Now the 2% are in your face daily...
Yeah even my father would call my mom his lady Old lady or Little woman now that is sexist LOL!
She still kick my dad butt if he need good butt kickin LOL!
Sensitivity is part of the homosexual wiring. Fortunately for Pat, the victim didn’t burst into tears, like that “Don’t pick on Britany!” guy..
One, among a history of thousands, of the Left’s “unintended consequences” of normalizing homosexual “marriage” ...
I have had the privilege of meeting Sajak. He is delightful, brilliant, warm, and (obviously) has a great sense of humor. He knows what he’s doing and loves all people: black, white, rainbow, whatever.
He should have asked the contestant if he was a pitcher or catcher.
The Faggotization of our country is almost complete.
I won’t click on a link to a site that calls Pat Sajak an extremist. Is there a utube link available? Thanks.
So what did he say wrong, was the guy playing the woman of the pair maybe?
Ed? Ed Grimley! Is that you?
With my triangle, I must say.
And the transsexuals who make up a mere 0.3%.
“Well, my lover Bruno WILL be a woman in about a month if the surgery goes well, Pat.”
“Who’s the lucky lady?”
Well... perhaps all ladies are lucky. It is possible. LOL
Exactly the FASCISTS want to control/change (through control) of people’s thinking. They cannot, nor will they succeed, and they’ll keep on raging.
Pat joked, “Hey, I had a 50/50 shot at it?” IOWs he made an innocent mistake. Kinda like Biden telling the guy in the wheel chair to stand up.
Did anyone else see the one where the woman said her wife or girlfriend and her two dogs were watching Wheel at home. Pat said, “And I’ll bet they’re licking the screen as we speak.” I couldn’t believe my ears.
Apparently, Mr. Klotz was not even offended.
It was Timothy Burke who tried to make a “scandal” out of it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.