Posted on 05/08/2014 7:55:52 AM PDT by Moseley
A man has filed a lawsuit in Florida for the right to marry his MacBook computer, according to the UK Telegraph newspaper. Chris Sevier argues that if same-sex marriages are allowed, on the grounds that one can marry anyone they love, then Sever should be allowed to marry his computer.
Apparently it is not just any computer that turns Sevier’s head, but the massive inventory of pornography stored on it: “Over time, I began preferring sex with my computer over sex with real women. Naturally, I ‘fell in love’ with my computer and preferred having sex with it over all other persons or things, as a result of classic conditioning upon orgasm,” he told a court in Florida.
READ THE FULL STORY AT:
http://aun-tv.com/florida-man-wants-to-marry-his-computer-filled-with-porn/
(Excerpt) Read more at aun-tv.com ...
It was only a matter of time.
And by what logic will the authorities deny his request, given the tortured logic they use to allow “same-sex marriage”.
Sure. Why not?
Okay you insensitive FReepers! Stop it. It’s a matter of choice...
Who are we to deny a computer it’s life-long carnal dreams of human intimacy?
What say ye Liberal judges?
This may take time. Marriage between humans and dogs, cats, cows, goats, sheep... may need to take place first to break the ground for this courageous act.
/s
I bet he can get it on welfare also.
The cowboy that tried to get a marriage license for him and his horse a few decades ago in Boulder could succeed now.
Now we get to watch a judge twist, turn and contort logic to try to delineate marriage to a computer, or a dog or several people from same-sex marriage. There is no more logic to marriage once you get rid of the man/woman construct. But judges are not going to want to allow it to go further and will need to figure out some BS argument about how this is different.
Of course. Your preference changed, it certainly wasn't the women preferring to resist the come-ons of a porn addict.
TAKE THAT, Dell !
Hell I support this guy on the sheer stupidity of it. Liberals simply can’t win on this one.
Let’s see... tradition wasn’t an issue, procreation wasn’t an issue, consent isn’t an issue...
I have used the same questions with libs who support perversion of marriage - why is your definition THE definition, when THE definition has been discarded?
What kind of children will come forth?
So is this considered a computer upgrade, or a computer downgrade?
What O.S. would be required to run this program?
After the marriage would it be a crime to erase the memory, or silence the speakers, or stop giving any keyboard stimulus?
What about common law? Would we all be married to our computers if we had the same one in the house for seven years?
Would contributing over the same computer to an internet forum, be grounds for a Palimony suit?
If we start a relationship with a computer right out of the manufacturer’s box, would it be statutory rape?
What would be the places we couldn’t touch, if it were still a young computer?
Scratches head...
Heck, this is even causing my circuits to overheat!
Why not, is it really all that much sillier than two people of the same gender getting married?
1s, 0s, and most likely 1 to 2% 11s and 00s.
given that he wants to marry his MAC Im guessing this is all about OS[e]X
Well, for starters, a computer can’t consent to marriage, unlike a homosexual.
I almost expect them to champion the guy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.