I've long distrusted the older Paul but had some faint glimmer of hope for his son. Well, that's long gone. His pro-dope stance, softness on the border issue and waffling when it comes to sodomy all make him a no-go in my book. And, yes, being so comfortable with Darwin's lexicon is just another reason why Rand Paul is totally out of consideration for me.
I increasingly have come to conclude that the "lib" in libertarian comes not from "liberty" but "liberal".
On “dope” issues, nobody’s picture is complete without asking why America felt it necessary to ban something that was wide open through the 1800’s. I see scapegoating here. Even the bible says that is the wrong approach.