1 posted on
03/24/2014 11:31:47 AM PDT by
Abakumov
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: Abakumov
Better happen quickly lest we have nothing to contribute but spitballs.
2 posted on
03/24/2014 11:33:31 AM PDT by
dforest
To: Abakumov
3 posted on
03/24/2014 11:34:31 AM PDT by
demshateGod
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
To: Abakumov
Mom jeans will do nothing.
4 posted on
03/24/2014 11:34:38 AM PDT by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: Abakumov
Well, boys, I reckon this is it. Nuclear combat toe-to-toe with the Rooskies.
6 posted on
03/24/2014 11:35:36 AM PDT by
MUDDOG
To: Abakumov
Mr. Soetoro wouldn’t do a day-um thang. Yeah, right - we’d go to war with Russia over what,? white people? /s
7 posted on
03/24/2014 11:35:51 AM PDT by
atc23
(The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever)
To: Abakumov
I think at the very least we should review what happened in WWII and during the Napoleonic era first.
To: Abakumov
the magic negro is a pussy who only wants to destroy America in every way.
9 posted on
03/24/2014 11:36:58 AM PDT by
Joe Boucher
((FUBO) obammy lied and lied and lied)
To: Abakumov
Peace in our time....
10 posted on
03/24/2014 11:39:04 AM PDT by
Leroy S. Mort
("Don't say sh*t unless you know for sure it helps." - Raylan Givens)
To: Abakumov
There would only be war between the U.S. and Russia IF it somehow benefitted obama and the democrat party.
11 posted on
03/24/2014 11:39:38 AM PDT by
RJS1950
(The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
To: Abakumov
Obama is only about war with tax paying citizens and traditional America.
12 posted on
03/24/2014 11:40:02 AM PDT by
Gaffer
(Comprehensive Immigration Reform is just another name for Comprehensive Capitulation)
To: Abakumov
Obama may go with NATO but only with high altitude bombing, backed up with drones.
13 posted on
03/24/2014 11:41:16 AM PDT by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
To: Abakumov
A direct war as opposed to the proxy wars of the last 50 years would be stupid. Unless our president wants to kill us in something like a suicide by cop scenario we’d best not get involved in this one. (The entire situation is Obama’s fault for seeming weak in the first place. Nothing so empowers a bully like a mom jeans, bike helmet wearing beta male in charge of the nuclear football.)
To: Abakumov
As much as I would love to see Russian mad dog chained and tamed, not going to happen with current pussy in WH.
15 posted on
03/24/2014 11:41:42 AM PDT by
Samogon
(Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something. - Plato)
To: Abakumov
Commander in Chief Obama (or whatever his name is)...
....what could possibly go wrong?
16 posted on
03/24/2014 11:42:04 AM PDT by
faithhopecharity
((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..))
To: Abakumov
Or would we do nothing and effectively destroy the NATO alliance?NATO is a polite fiction, dead lo these 20+ years.
If Putin wants the end of NATO to be explicit (he may), then he will invade Estonia and expose the lies that have grown up since 1991-1994.
OTOH, he may want to wait until a time when the public funeral of NATO would bring him more advantage.
Either way, watch Merkel. The Germans have a lot to lose here, but they have potentially quite a lot to gain, as well.
17 posted on
03/24/2014 11:42:11 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. H)
To: Abakumov
19 posted on
03/24/2014 11:44:25 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: Abakumov
we are at war with Russia/Communist. It’s never been “Not a war”.
20 posted on
03/24/2014 11:45:25 AM PDT by
Dick Vomer
(democrats are like flies, whatever they don't eat they sh#t on.)
To: Abakumov
Kiss you *** goodbye.
21 posted on
03/24/2014 11:45:30 AM PDT by
McGruff
(They say the first casualty of war is truth)
To: Abakumov
Putin would arrange circumstances such that Obama could stay out of it. Maybe frame up the subject country as the aggressor. NATO is officially a "defensive alliance," so aiding an "aggressor" would not be required.
That having been said I think any such scenario is improbable.
To: Abakumov
But if Russia moved against Poland or the Baltic States, would the United States really go to war? The question isn't wheter the U.S. would but whether the rest of NATO would.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson