Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Unconscionable Silence
Townhall.com ^ | February 20, 2014 | Judge Andrew Napolitano

Posted on 02/20/2014 11:00:42 AM PST by Kaslin

The political philosopher Edmund Burke once remarked that all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good folks to do nothing. A glaring example of the impending triumph of a constitutional evil that could be stopped by folks who have been largely silent is the tyranny coming from the White House. And the folks who can stop this and are doing nothing about it are our elected representatives in Congress.

The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. It established the three branches of government, and it delegated "all legislative powers" to Congress. American law rarely uses the word "all." Yet the Framers chose that word precisely to confine law writing to Congress and to prevent a president from altering federal law by the selective manner of his enforcement of it and thereby effectively rewriting it.

The same Framers sought to guard against the same evils by compelling the president to swear at the commencement of his terms in office that he will "faithfully" enforce the laws. The use of the word "faithfully," like the use of the word "all," is intended to assure voters that they can count on a president who will do the job they hired him to do by enforcing federal laws, not evading them, and by enforcing them as Congress has written them, not as the president might wish them to be.

To be fair, many presidents, from the sainted Thomas Jefferson to the tyrannical FDR, put their own spin on federal law. Jefferson pardoned all those convicted under the Alien and Sedition Acts because he hated a statute that punished free speech and he boasted that he would not enforce that part of the acts (they expired under his watch). And FDR when barely two weeks in office issued an executive order criminalizing the possession of gold because he foolishly thought it would stabilize the banks, until an adviser reminded him that only Congress can write criminal laws (which he then persuaded Congress to do). Yet in President Obama we have a president whose personal interferences in the enforcement of federal laws reveal his view that he can rewrite them and even nullify them.

Presidential law writing violates the presidential oath of office, steals power from Congress, disrespects an equal branch of the government and, when unchecked, accumulates such power in the executive branch that it effectively transforms the president into a menacing tyrant who rejects his constitutional obligations and limitations.

Obama bombed Libya without a declaration of war from Congress. This arguably brought down the Gadhafi government, which led to the current state of lawlessness there, which produced the environment in which our ambassador was murdered in Benghazi in 2012 and established a dangerous precedent because Congress remained officially silent.

He has told the 11 million illegal immigrants who are here and subject to deportation that if they comply with a new set of rules they will not be deported. The constitutional problem is that the president wrote those rules. Only Congress can craft such rules, and by the president's doing so, he has schooled immigrants in how to avoid compliance with federal law.

The president has used drones to kill Americans, but claims he has done so lawfully because he complied with secret rules that he crafted. Under the Constitution, if the president wants someone dead, he must afford the person due process or ask Congress to declare war on the country housing the person. No worries, he says -- he has followed the secret rules that he wrote to govern himself when deciding whom to kill.

The president's agents now acknowledge that they spy on all of us all the time, including members of the judiciary and Congress. This, too, was done pursuant to a secret presidential directive, secretly approved by judges acting as clerks and not under the Constitution, and by a dozen members of Congress sworn to secrecy. No law authorized this, and the president won't discuss it meaningfully, except to condemn its revelation.

And in a series of salvos that hit home, the president has modified the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) 29 times, by changing its various dates of effectiveness for some but not for others, by changing the meanings of terms for some but not for others, and even by diluting the signature obligation we all have to obtain the platinum insurance policies it commands for some and not for others. He has done all of this on his own, with no input from Congress. He has even threatened to veto any congressional effort to enact into law the very changes he alone has made.

His latest assault on the Constitution consists of a plan by the Department of Homeland Security, revealed earlier this week, effectively to follow us as we drive on public roads by photographing the license plate of all motor vehicles. This, too, was formulated without congressional approval or constitutional authority.

And while all of this is going on, Congress largely sits as a potted plant. In the Senate, Sens. Rand Paul, Ted Cruz and Mike Lee have complained long and loud, but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will not permit legislation to address presidential lawlessness to reach the Senate floor. A few dozen Republicans in the House have complained, but Speaker John Boehner will not permit the House to address corrective legislation. Institutionally and officially, Congress is sleeping.

Can you imagine how a Democratic Congress would have reacted if Ronald Reagan had instructed the IRS to cease collecting capital gains taxes so as to spur economic activity; or how a Republican Congress would have reacted if Bill Clinton had instructed the IRS to add a 1-percent rate increase to the tax bills of billionaires so as to close a budget gap?

These are dangerous times because this is a lawless presidency and a pliant Congress. The president's willingness to violate the Constitution publicly calls into question his fitness for office. And that deafening silence from Capitol Hill manifests a spineless refusal to preserve constitutional government.

The whole purpose of dividing and separating governmental powers is the preservation of personal liberty by preventing the accumulation of too much power in one branch or, heaven forbid, in one person. Whoever permits this to take place lacks fidelity to the Constitution, is unworthy of holding governmental power in a free society and should be removed from office.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: foundingfathers; residentbarack0bama

1 posted on 02/20/2014 11:00:42 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"And while all of this is going on, Congress largely sits as a potted plant."

"Can you imagine how a Democratic Congress would have reacted if Ronald Reagan had instructed the IRS to cease collecting capital gains taxes so as to spur economic activity ..."

2 posted on 02/20/2014 11:16:58 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Law is only what we say it is. Got it?
3 posted on 02/20/2014 11:22:31 AM PST by JPG (Yes We Can morphs into Make It Hurt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The political philosopher Edmund Burke once remarked that all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good folks to do nothing. A glaring example of the impending triumph of a constitutional evil that could be stopped by folks who have been largely silent is the tyranny coming from the White House. And the folks who can stop this and are doing nothing about it are our elected representatives in Congress

And yet, some 'Republicans' would say we need to stop our in-fighting in the hopes of re-electing do nothing RINOs that have quietly put up with this tyrant for years.

Instead of engineering legislative maneuvers to stop him, they engineer backstabbing show votes that are a designed-to-fail fait accompli that also lies to constituents. And yet, we still hear many, many people espousing that we can only prosper and get rid of this man and Obamacare through REELECTING the same people, AGAIN! Hold your nose and pull that lever - again, and again and again.

If the RINOS and the RINOS we are to keep reelecting are so ineffectual, how come one determined Senator can thwart all their carefully laid plans as Cruz did with making McConnell and Cornyn show their true [turn]coats?

I'm not buying it. I'm not gonna hold my nose, and I'm not going to appease along with them.

4 posted on 02/20/2014 11:39:03 AM PST by Gaffer (Comprehensive Immigration Reform is just another name for Comprehensive Capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We live in a post-constitutional republic.


5 posted on 02/20/2014 12:05:04 PM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Why are the linguini-spined Pubbies and RINOs sitting silent? Because we rank and file conservative, patriotic Americans aren't yanking their chains, and threatening their jobs if they don't get moving. Grab the picket signs, put on your comfortable shoes, and head down to their local offices. They'll get busy when the protest headlines the evening news on Channel 2, or 7, or 13, or whatever your local station is.

If they're not doing what we want them to do, why aren't we forcing them to do what we want them to do?

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

6 posted on 02/20/2014 12:17:55 PM PST by wku man (We are the 53%! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUXN0GDuLN4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Uh-oh, Anne Coulter says we are not supposed to listen to men that talk about defeating the GOPe! Next thing you know you’ll be telling us something crazy like, “character matters”!


7 posted on 02/20/2014 12:19:01 PM PST by Turbo Pig (...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Thanks Kaslin. A very good article. I’ve always liked Judge Napolitano. I’m always interested in what he has to say.


8 posted on 02/20/2014 1:08:01 PM PST by Daaave ("Well bless my soul what's wrong with me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

You bet I can. They would have demanded his impeachment


9 posted on 02/20/2014 1:11:07 PM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Daaave

You are welcome.


10 posted on 02/20/2014 1:11:51 PM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The elements are slowly coming together to turn things around. Can’t happen soon enough.


11 posted on 02/20/2014 1:22:10 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson