[mylife]

Mark is one of the good guys.

Godspeed Mark.

[mrsmel]

Bump, this needs to be seen. It’s the first I’d heard of it. Steyn really gets under the leftist tyrants’ skins, they keep dragging him into court.

[Fungi]

Mark is on the right (correct) side and he deserves to be supported. Can someone please inform the author that he does not know how to write?

[Slings and Arrows]

Steyn ping.

[TChad]

I suspect that the trial will simply be D.C. political theater directed by the left.

It now looks — go to Steynonline.com for the full story — as if Steyn is going to be up there on his own, fighting and financing his case without the support of his magazine, National Review; that the outcome is not as certain as it seemed at the beginning; and that this hero deserves all the help we can give him.

Absolutely.

[martin_fierro]

I heard Mann was a Nobel Prize recipient.

* snicker *

[JennysCool]

There are a lot of sharp, successful conservative attorneys. For all he's done, and will continue to do, Mark Steyn's defense against these stupid suits should be pro bono.

[Boogieman]

Here’s a link with info on how to support him, if anyone wants to chip in:

http://www.steynonline.com/6048/give-the-gift-of-steyn

[Political Junkie Too]

I must have missed the details of this. Help me to understand what is going on.

Committing a crime is no longer the crime? Exposing the criminal actions of others is now the crime?

-PJ

[Fledermaus]

Mann is the incarnation of Rachel Carson.

[DB]

Just sent Mark four of his own $25 gift certificates as gifts...

[Peet]

Mann forced “Minnisotans for Global Warning” to remove his image from their hilarious AGW spoof “Hide The Decline”

Search for ‘em on youtube, they are very funny...

[Elsie]

If it is a sin to doubt, then there is no science.

If it is a crime to dissent, then there is no politics.

--Scaramouche

 

 

 

 

 

Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled.

Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you're being had...

 

Consensus is invoked only in situations where the science is not solid enough. Nobody says the consensus of scientists agrees that E=mc2.

Nobody says the consensus is that the sun is 93 million miles away. It would never occur to anyone to speak that way.

--Michael Crichton

[skinkinthegrass]

hmm..when MS gets on RUSH's Radio program; he shall
ream this hoaxer, MM another hole in his vacuous head.

[Liberty Valance]

bttt

[Gritty]

Outrage Bump!

[GOPJ]

...the hockey stick, on which Mann’s reputation largely rests, was and is a nonsense. It obliterates the medieval warm period; it is unduly reliant on proxy data — bristlecone pine samples — which are known to be unreliable; it is dependent on a flawed algorithm which, according to every statistical authority who has ever looked at the subject, creates the same hockey-stick data almost regardless of the information you feed into it.

Elite liberals don't care about truth, research methods or statistics - they care about winning.

[Usagi_yo]

You would think that the Judge would laugh at a scientist who publicly asserted a theory then started suing his critics.

[bayouranger]

Thanx for this post