The federal judiciary is out of control. They’re overturning the will of the people and state legislatures throughout the nation. It’s got to stop.
Yet another brilliant federal “judge” engaging in the destruction of America.
Liberals have finally succeeded in controlling all the judicial posts, apparently. They can make it “legal” all they want, but anyone performing such a wedding in the first place is breaking the Law. They will just answer for it later.
Where’d they get the children from?
They say it is unconstitutional but never say why.
Is it Nullification O’Clock yet?
Every one of the court rulings that imposes Gay Marriage on a state and even the DOMA decision has been based on the 14th Amendment.
Therefore, it is time that we as a people to save our Nation, Repeal the 14th Amendment.
Ignore the ruling and enforce the law anyway.
The only real and appropriate response should be the KY AttyGeneral saying, “Following the 10th Amendment of the US Constitution, this decision
IS OF NO EFFECT
on the day-to-day business of the Great Commnwealth of Kentucky.
Well, the impossible has happened. This ‘couple’ has had two children. My high school biology teacher was wrong all those years ago. I knew my spelling teacher was wrong but had some faith in my biology teacher.
So are all state licensing regs now moot? Licensed once, licensed for all or is it just for homosexuals?
They have two children together? Let me guess - one is named Mr. Hankie.
So, our state does not recognize a freaking marriage between sexual transvestites, gays, lesbians, trans-gender, operation pending, sexual deviates. If the feds sue us, that's another job for Attorney General Abbott to face them down at the Supreme Court like he has done numerous times, and WON.
And, by the way, GREG ABBOTT FOR TEXAS GOVERNOR
A federal judge ruled on Wednesday that Kentucky’s ban on recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other states is unconstitutional.
Disgusting. We are unmoored from the constitution.
Just dissolve the State legislatures and let the Federal Judges rule the states.
We have too many law schools.
At this point ANY quack can become a lawyer and then a judge. Qualifications are meaningless.
How about just letting ANYBODY sit for the bar exams?
How about federalizing licensing of lawyers for all fifty states?
It is junk judges which are enforcing the marxism.
ARRIVING IN GOMORRAH
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hd3tonnjMSI&list=UUFDlhK80EdO28R-iGTXiGaw&feature=c4-overview
What is the name and email address of this scumbag Federal Judge?
Under Congress's constitutional Article IV, Section 1 authority which allows Congress to legislatively determine the extent to which one state has to respect the records of another state, the significant DOMA provision which still stands is Section 2 below.
DOMA:
This Act may be cited as the "Defense of Marriage Act".
No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word 'marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word 'spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.
Note that Section 3 above is what the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional. And I agree with the Supreme Court because the states have never delegated to Congress, via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate marriage. Only the states can regulate marriage. And only the states can amend the Constitution to define marriage. The problem is that the states, including low-information state lawmakers, have been asleep at the wheel concerning such issues.
Also, probably the main reason that patriots tremble in their boots when activist judges rule in favor of the pro-gay movement is the following imo. Low information-patriots evidently do not understand that the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect gay marriage which this judge seems to be ignoring. So the states can actually make laws which distriminate against things like gay marriage, imo, as long as such laws don't also unreasonably abridge constitutionally enumerated rights.