What GLAAD and Muslim Extremists Have in Common

Crisis Magazine ^ | February 5, 2014 | William Kilpatrick

[NYer]

Ping!

[Ready4Freddy]

“The OIC is the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation, a 56-state organization”

57, actually, no doubt the source of B Hussein’s “57 state” comment

[I want the USA back]

They’re both intolerant fascist groups seeking to force compliance with their will.

[expat2]

I think we are beginning to need a Conservatives Anti-Defamation League......

[Biggirl]

But thankfully, the internet is a safe area.

[mongo141]

They are both willing to commit murder or acts of terrorism to get their way?

[moovova]

...have in common?

Knife meet neck.

[Biggirl]

Second it.

[onedoug]

Homosexuals will not be so gay when sharia - which is what they’re fighting for whether they know it or not - starts herding them into the stadiums.

[nascarnation]

They’re betting on the Chinese to have hegemony...which is much more likely IMHO.

[John O]

The only way humanity is going to survive long term is the eradication of both moslems and gays.

[MrB]

They have a common Enemy in Christ.

[verga]

Nailed it and it only took 4 posts.

[Lonely Bull]

They’re both intolerant fascist groups seeking to force compliance with their will.

Two more things, which people have mentioned but which I want to mention together in a single post:

Both are also "diverse" in Progressive Land. For example, both are not aligned with what I'll call historic Christianity. Your friendly local leftists will embrace both while happily defaming, for example, conservatives.

Both are also actually opposed to each other when neither is diluted; you may see some Gay Muslim groups at the fringes, but just try to start a Gay Pride Parade in Kabul, Tehran, or Mecca.

Of course, if you were ever to embrace an ever-increasing, ever-mindless Circle of Diversity (from which, of course, conservatism is perpetually excluded), you would probably expect that some of the things within this circle would oppose one another.

For a few obvious reasons, though, just about anyone who points out the fact will probably never be one of your friendly local leftists.

[Bob]

The folks at the FreeDominion website would disagree with you on the internet being safe. (Unless I missed any intended sarcasm in your post. If I did, my apologies. )

[FrdmLvr]

Bingo!

[FrdmLvr]

that this is not an indictment of all gays

We already know that, as the article is about GLAAD.

[WayneS]

They are terrorist a—holes?

[Biggirl]

What happened there?