Skip to comments.
Obamacare remakes the economy -- and it's not all that bad
Yahoo Finance ^
| FEb 4, 2014
| Rick Newman
Posted on 02/04/2014 6:51:03 PM PST by Innovative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
This lie is in the same class as "if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. PERIOD" and "if you like your health insurance, you can keep your health insurance. PERIOD".
To: Innovative
yeah how do you destroy something you have already destroyed
To: Innovative
the boy is remaking the economy in his own image... quota driven and lazy
3
posted on
02/04/2014 6:53:31 PM PST
by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
To: Innovative
If it's “not all that bad” why have the framers (the Rat Party elite) made sure that the rich,the powerful and the “connected” are all exempt?
4
posted on
02/04/2014 6:54:29 PM PST
by
Gay State Conservative
(Osama Obama Care: A Religion That Will Have You On Your Knees!)
To: Innovative
That duckspeak is giving the Aflac® duck fits.
5
posted on
02/04/2014 6:55:12 PM PST
by
Olog-hai
To: Innovative
And the people who will die because their health insurance was cancelled and can’t afford the astronomical premiums demanded by Obamacare, well heck, they would have died anyway, so it’s all good.
6
posted on
02/04/2014 7:03:17 PM PST
by
SpaceBar
To: Innovative
7
posted on
02/04/2014 7:03:45 PM PST
by
Fungi
To: Innovative
Is this CBO report the equivalent of a Financial Impact Statement?
8
posted on
02/04/2014 7:06:09 PM PST
by
Graewoulf
(Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
To: Innovative
The ACA will reduce the total number of hours worked, the CBO explained in its report, almost entirely because workers will choose to supply less labor.Yes... it HELPS the economy when you pass laws that (even its greatest proponents say) will cause people to want to work less.
double-plus good-speak from the non-partisan CBO.
9
posted on
02/04/2014 7:12:21 PM PST
by
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
To: Innovative
Double speak and gibberish.
Does anyone remember “Funemployment”?
10
posted on
02/04/2014 7:21:27 PM PST
by
mylife
(Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
To: Innovative
Two million more people on YOUR nearby street corner with a cardboard sign “Homeless Vet....Anything will help...God Bless”
11
posted on
02/04/2014 7:23:19 PM PST
by
Rembrandt
(Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
To: Innovative
On the bright side, work sucked anyway.
12
posted on
02/04/2014 7:27:09 PM PST
by
DManA
To: Innovative
To: Innovative
Why work to pay for your HC when you can sit home and have someone else pay for your subsidies. As Pelosi stated; now you can become a poet, artist, or go back to college and study 13th century Lesbian Literature
14
posted on
02/04/2014 7:28:52 PM PST
by
Joshua
(Jimmy is the reason for this)
To: Innovative
So now you don’t have to work as hard to earn health insurance coverage. Well golly gee, lets all get into that cart and ride. Why be the poor sap who has to do all the pulling?
15
posted on
02/04/2014 7:30:21 PM PST
by
fhayek
To: Joshua
16
posted on
02/04/2014 7:31:54 PM PST
by
mylife
(Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
To: Innovative
I read the article and it fits in with Nancy Pelosi’s vision of a nation of loafers (’artist’ as she called them) or folks who are generally uncommitted to their jobs. This may seem good for any given individual, but I don’t see how it will not hurt the overall economy. Plus, the additional unemployed will find other interesting things to do, resulting in higher crime rates. Perhaps they will form the core of Obama’s tonton macoute “Domestic Security Force”.
17
posted on
02/04/2014 7:39:47 PM PST
by
BRK
To: Innovative
So promoting a culture if dependency and the patron state is not all that bad?
Bra....yoos kuhrayzee ...
18
posted on
02/04/2014 7:42:44 PM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: BRK
I read the article and it fits in with Nancy Pelosis vision of a nation of loafers (artist as she called them) or folks who are generally uncommitted to their jobs. This may seem good for any given individual... Not really good for the individual either. The cliche that idle minds are the devil's workshop is not far from the truth. God gave us work to do. Even when the world was perfect, God gave Adam a job - to keep and dress the Garden. Likewise Paul wrote in his letter to the Thessalonians that he who does not work shall not eat.
No matter what the task, toilet cleaner, teacher, or doctor - all the work we do is to the Glory of a God. Idleness does not glorify His Name.
19
posted on
02/04/2014 7:56:45 PM PST
by
El Cid
(Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
To: Innovative
They represent people who hold a job primarily for the healthcare benefits provided by their employer, and might choose not to work it they could get coverage some other way. These are people who hold jobs to take care of themselves, but would rather have other people hold jobs to pay for their care. Only a liberal would think that type of change is a good thing; I've never understood those who admire parasites or who aspire to that status.
20
posted on
02/05/2014 2:21:56 AM PST
by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson