Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

According to the loony judge, once you get a government job that locks in your retirement, insurance, etc. benefits as of that time and the city cannot change that going forward. CA is doomed but if this holds on appeal it will speed up the crash and burn.
1 posted on 12/23/2013 8:17:57 PM PST by fifedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fifedom

This ruling will last 5 minutes before an appeal...


2 posted on 12/23/2013 8:20:58 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks ("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fifedom

Try to imagine private sector jobs where your pensions, insurance and benefits are locked in and the employer can’t touch them and it takes a act of congress to even fire you...


3 posted on 12/23/2013 8:30:03 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fifedom

Sumpn’s gotta give.


4 posted on 12/23/2013 8:30:23 PM PST by umgud (2A can't survive dem majorities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fifedom

Pension reform has to take place and it should apply to all new employees and be part of negotiated agreements in the future .

Also, any officer hired should sign a contract obligation him to 5 years or the employees will pay back the costs for training.


5 posted on 12/23/2013 8:39:06 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fifedom

When the cupboard is bare, good luck collecting ...


6 posted on 12/23/2013 8:54:21 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fifedom

Too bad they don’t give the same consideration to our military.


7 posted on 12/23/2013 8:55:22 PM PST by JABit (Another retired vet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fifedom
so for new employees, Measure B can be activated.....its just the precious fannys of the current workers and the precious retirees that can't be touched...

so what we have here is the old again robbing from the young....the haves and the have nots....

these retirees and older workers just don't care that their obscene pensions and benefits are borne on the back of the new workers, often the young with young children...

8 posted on 12/23/2013 9:21:04 PM PST by cherry (.in the time of universal deceit, telling the truth is revolutionary.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fifedom

This was a ruling under California state law.

It is irrelevant to what happens when a city files for bankruptcy. What happens in bankruptcy court is generally governed by federal bankruptcy law. Under bankruptcy law, pension benefits can be cut. What this state court judge claims state law requires about pensions will not be relevant.


9 posted on 12/23/2013 9:44:31 PM PST by TheConservator ("I spent my life trying not to be careless. Women and children can be careless, but not men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fifedom

Bankruptcy is the only way out. DO IT NOW!!!


10 posted on 12/23/2013 9:45:30 PM PST by Dapper 26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fifedom
So, according to this judge, every time a city employee is hired, they automatically become an elected official who determines future budgets.

Because, in the fantasy world, that is what people are elected to do; make the city budget. In this judge's reality, people are elected to simply approve previous city hirings and benefits promises.

Probably because judges have their own compensation plan and those too are lifetime benefits, and without rubber stamping all other big benefits, theirs too might be on the chopping block.

So pay up, all cities, give all the people's money to...the government employees.

11 posted on 12/24/2013 12:07:17 AM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fifedom
Pension reform is needed but once the government/companies makes a promise of a pension, they should be held to paying for that pension. People make decisions based upon benefits offer and if one person takes a lower paying job with a guarantee of a pension verses a higher paying job with no pension, the government/company should have to follow through on that. Few on this site would argue that our military pensions should be cut. It's the same principle.
12 posted on 12/24/2013 2:39:04 AM PST by HarleyD (...one of his disciples, whom Jesus loved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson