According to the loony judge, once you get a government job that locks in your retirement, insurance, etc. benefits as of that time and the city cannot change that going forward. CA is doomed but if this holds on appeal it will speed up the crash and burn.
1 posted on
12/23/2013 8:17:57 PM PST by
fifedom
To: fifedom
This ruling will last 5 minutes before an appeal...
2 posted on
12/23/2013 8:20:58 PM PST by
Eric in the Ozarks
("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
To: fifedom
Try to imagine private sector jobs where your pensions, insurance and benefits are locked in and the employer can’t touch them and it takes a act of congress to even fire you...
3 posted on
12/23/2013 8:30:03 PM PST by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: fifedom
4 posted on
12/23/2013 8:30:23 PM PST by
umgud
(2A can't survive dem majorities)
To: fifedom
Pension reform has to take place and it should apply to all new employees and be part of negotiated agreements in the future .
Also, any officer hired should sign a contract obligation him to 5 years or the employees will pay back the costs for training.
5 posted on
12/23/2013 8:39:06 PM PST by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: fifedom
When the cupboard is bare, good luck collecting ...
6 posted on
12/23/2013 8:54:21 PM PST by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: fifedom
Too bad they don’t give the same consideration to our military.
7 posted on
12/23/2013 8:55:22 PM PST by
JABit
(Another retired vet.)
To: fifedom
so for new employees, Measure B can be activated.....its just the precious fannys of the current workers and the precious retirees that can't be touched...
so what we have here is the old again robbing from the young....the haves and the have nots....
these retirees and older workers just don't care that their obscene pensions and benefits are borne on the back of the new workers, often the young with young children...
8 posted on
12/23/2013 9:21:04 PM PST by
cherry
(.in the time of universal deceit, telling the truth is revolutionary.....)
To: fifedom
This was a ruling under California state law.
It is irrelevant to what happens when a city files for bankruptcy. What happens in bankruptcy court is generally governed by federal bankruptcy law. Under bankruptcy law, pension benefits can be cut. What this state court judge claims state law requires about pensions will not be relevant.
9 posted on
12/23/2013 9:44:31 PM PST by
TheConservator
("I spent my life trying not to be careless. Women and children can be careless, but not men.")
To: fifedom
Bankruptcy is the only way out. DO IT NOW!!!
To: fifedom
So, according to this judge, every time a city employee is hired, they automatically become an elected official who determines future budgets.
Because, in the fantasy world, that is what people are elected to do; make the city budget. In this judge's reality, people are elected to simply approve previous city hirings and benefits promises.
Probably because judges have their own compensation plan and those too are lifetime benefits, and without rubber stamping all other big benefits, theirs too might be on the chopping block.
So pay up, all cities, give all the people's money to...the government employees.
11 posted on
12/24/2013 12:07:17 AM PST by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: fifedom
Pension reform is needed but once the government/companies makes a promise of a pension, they should be held to paying for that pension. People make decisions based upon benefits offer and if one person takes a lower paying job with a guarantee of a pension verses a higher paying job with no pension, the government/company should have to follow through on that. Few on this site would argue that our military pensions should be cut. It's the same principle.
12 posted on
12/24/2013 2:39:04 AM PST by
HarleyD
(...one of his disciples, whom Jesus loved.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson