Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese Naval Vessel Tries to Force U.S. Warship to Stop in International Waters
Washington Free Beacon ^ | 12/13/2013 | Bill Gertz

Posted on 12/13/2013 2:57:59 AM PST by markomalley

A Chinese naval vessel tried to force a U.S. guided missile warship to stop in international waters recently, causing a tense military standoff in the latest case of Chinese maritime harassment, according to defense officials.

The guided missile cruiser USS Cowpens, which recently took part in disaster relief operations in the Philippines, was confronted by Chinese warships in the South China Sea near Beijing’s new aircraft carrier Liaoning, according to officials familiar with the incident.

“On December 5th, while lawfully operating in international waters in the South China Sea, USS Cowpens and a PLA Navy vessel had an encounter that required maneuvering to avoid a collision,” a Navy official said.

“This incident underscores the need to ensure the highest standards of professional seamanship, including communications between vessels, to mitigate the risk of an unintended incident or mishap.”

A State Department official said the U.S. government issued protests to China in both Washington and Beijing in both diplomatic and military channels.

The Cowpens was conducting surveillance of the Liaoning at the time. The carrier had recently sailed from the port of Qingdao on the northern Chinese coast into the South China Sea.

According to the officials, the run-in began after a Chinese navy vessel sent a hailing warning and ordered the Cowpens to stop. The cruiser continued on its course and refused the order because it was operating in international waters.

Then a Chinese tank landing ship sailed in front of the Cowpens and stopped, forcing the Cowpens to abruptly change course in what the officials said was a dangerous maneuver.

According to the officials, the Cowpens was conducting a routine operation done to exercise its freedom of navigation near the Chinese carrier when the incident occurred about a week ago.

The encounter was the type of incident that senior Pentagon officials recently warned could take place as a result of heightened tensions in the region over China’s declaration of an air defense identification zone (ADIZ) in the East China Sea.

Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recently called China’s new air defense zone destabilizing and said it increased the risk of a military “miscalculation.”

China’s military forces in recent days have dispatched Su-30 and J-11 fighter jets, as well as KJ-2000 airborne warning and control aircraft, to the zone to monitor the airspace that is used frequently by U.S. and Japanese military surveillance aircraft.

The United States has said it does not recognize China’s ADIZ, as has Japan’s government.

Two U.S. B-52 bombers flew through the air zone last month but were not shadowed by Chinese interceptor jets.

Chinese naval and air forces also have been pressing Japan in the East China Sea over Tokyo’s purchase a year ago of several uninhabited Senkaku Islands located north of Taiwan and south of Okinawa.

China is claiming the islands, which it calls the Diaoyu. They are believed to contain large undersea reserves of natural gas and oil.

The Liaoning, China’s first carrier that was refitted from an old Soviet carrier, and four warships recently conducted their first training maneuvers in the South China Sea. The carrier recently docked at the Chinese naval port of Hainan on the South China Sea.

Defense officials have said China’s imposition of the ADIZ is aimed primarily at curbing surveillance flights in the zone, which China’s military regards as a threat to its military secrets.

The U.S. military conducts surveillance flights with EP-3 aircraft and long-range RQ-4 Global Hawk drones.

In addition to the Liaoning, Chinese warships in the flotilla include two missile destroyers, the Shenyang and the Shijiazhuang, and two missile frigates, the Yantai and the Weifang.

Rick Fisher, a China military affairs expert, said it is likely that the Chinese deliberately staged the incident as part of a strategy of pressuring the United States.

“They can afford to lose an LST [landing ship] as they have about 27 of them, but they are also usually armed with one or more twin 37 millimeter cannons, which at close range could heavily damage a lightly armored U.S. Navy destroyer,” said Fisher, a senior fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center.

Most Chinese Navy large combat ships would be out-ranged by the 127-millimeter guns deployed on U.S. cruisers, except China’s Russian-made Sovremenny-class ships and Beijing’s new Type 052D destroyers that are armed with 130-millimeter guns.

The encounter appears to be part of a pattern of Chinese political signaling that it will not accept the presence of American military power in its East Asian theater of influence, Fisher said.

“China has spent the last 20 years building up its Navy and now feels that it can use it to obtain its political objectives,” he said.

Fisher said that since early 2012 China has gone on the offensive in both the South China and East China Seas.

“In this early stage of using its newly acquired naval power, China is posturing and bullying, but China is also looking for a fight, a battle that will cow the Americans, the Japanese, and the Filipinos,” he said.

To maintain stability in the face of Chinese military assertiveness, Fisher said the United States and Japan should seek an armed peace in the region by heavily fortifying the Senkaku Islands and the rest of the island chain they are part of.

“The U.S. and Japan should also step up their rearmament of the Philippines,” Fisher said.

The Cowpens incident is the most recent example of Chinese naval aggressiveness toward U.S. ships.

The U.S. intelligence-gathering ship, USNS Impeccable, came under Chinese naval harassment from a China Maritime Surveillance ship, part of Beijing’s quasi-military maritime patrol craft, in June.

During that incident, the Chinese ship warned the Navy ship it was operating illegally despite sailing in international waters. The Chinese demanded that the ship first obtain permission before sailing in the area that was more than 100 miles from China’s coast.

The U.S. military has been stepping up surveillance of China’s naval forces, including the growing submarine fleet, as part of the U.S. policy of rebalancing forces to the Pacific.

The Impeccable was harassed in March 2009 by five Chinese ships that followed it and sprayed it with water hoses in an effort to thwart its operations.

A second spy ship, the USNS Victorious, also came under Chinese maritime harassment several years ago.

Adm. Samuel Locklear, when asked last summer about increased Chinese naval activities near Guam and Hawaii in retaliation for U.S. ship-based spying on China, said the dispute involves different interpretations of controlled waters.

Locklear said in a meeting with reporters in July, “We believe the U.S. position is that those activities are less constrained than what the Chinese believe.”

China is seeking to control large areas of international waters—claiming they are part of its United Nations-defined economic exclusion zone—that Locklear said cover “most of the major sea lines of communication” near China and are needed to remain free for trade and shipping.

Locklear, who is known for his conciliatory views toward the Chinese military, sought to play down recent disputes. When asked if the Chinese activities were troubling, he said: “I would say it’s not provocative certainly. I’d say that in the Asia-Pacific, in the areas that are closer to the Chinese homeland, that we have been able to conduct operations around each other in a very professional and increasingly professional manner.”

The Pentagon and U.S. Pacific Command have sought to develop closer ties to the Chinese military as part of the Obama administration’s Asia pivot policies.

However, China’s military has shown limited interest in closer ties.

China’s state-controlled news media regularly report that the United States is seeking to defeat China by encircling the country with enemies while promoting dissidents within who seek the ouster of the communist regime.

The Obama administration has denied it is seeking to “contain” China and has insisted it wants continued close economic and diplomatic relations.

President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to seek a new type of major power relationship during a summit in California earlier this year. However, the exact nature of the new relationship remains unclear.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: adiz; china; chinesemilitary; chinesenavy; energy; maritime; naturalgas; oil; philippines; redchina; shipmovement; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 401-422 next last

1 posted on 12/13/2013 2:57:59 AM PST by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Obama would not back any naval officer engaged in a serious confrontation with the Chinese and that has to color any decisions made in theatre.


2 posted on 12/13/2013 3:06:30 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
For reference:

A PLAN tank landing ship:

The USS Cowpens:

Place your bets...

3 posted on 12/13/2013 3:11:12 AM PST by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
Obama would not back any naval officer engaged in a serious confrontation with the Chinese and that has to color any decisions made in theatre.

Let's face it...after the Catalina Island incident, they'd have to nuke us repeatedly before Obama would admit to "tension."

4 posted on 12/13/2013 3:13:26 AM PST by papertyger ("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

It has taken a decade and a half but now we are seeing the chickens sold to China by the treasonous Bill and Hillary Clinton for illicit campaign funds, “are coming home to roost!”

For the low information Clinton supporters that would be the missile guidance systems and super computing.

The Progressives making the world safer for communism one sell out at a time.


5 posted on 12/13/2013 3:14:11 AM PST by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The world leaders are ROTFLTAO at anything mac daddy does or says.

His word are totally worthless with never ending lies.

He is the biggest joke in the world.


6 posted on 12/13/2013 3:14:56 AM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
d@nm how much we've fallen since pResident 0'B@$t@$D's
tenure in the White Hut and we still 3 g*d awful years left..
d@nm, d@mn our cowardly Congressional Ldrs, d@mn 'em all.

7 posted on 12/13/2013 3:28:16 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

U. S.: We protest.

China: Whatev.


8 posted on 12/13/2013 3:29:57 AM PST by savedbygrace (But God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Ramming speed!


9 posted on 12/13/2013 3:32:27 AM PST by Wyrd bi ful ard (Gone Galt, 11/07/12----No king but Christ! Don't tread on me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chiefqc
The world leaders are ROTFLTAO at anything mac daddy does or says. His word are totally worthless with never ending lies. He is the biggest joke in the world.

Indeed they are and indeed he is.

10 posted on 12/13/2013 3:32:36 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

So, take that “funny” looking gun on the front of the ship and start firing across the bow of that POS.

If that doesn’t cause them to back off then maybe an accidental hole or two in the water line of the PLAN would be a rather distinct message.


11 posted on 12/13/2013 3:33:42 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Reporting this should be good for 200+ on the Dow.


12 posted on 12/13/2013 3:36:15 AM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks markomalley.


13 posted on 12/13/2013 3:39:25 AM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

FON is not just for air defense zones that obama capitulates to

look at what happened to us when Bubba’s foreign policy was see no evil, take no meaningful action


14 posted on 12/13/2013 3:41:47 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylecouncilor; windcliff

Cowpens ping.


15 posted on 12/13/2013 3:43:19 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chiefqc
The world leaders are ROTFLTAO at anything mac daddy does or says. His word are totally worthless with never ending lies. He is the biggest joke in the world.

The people who financed the clown known as Obama are really quite pleased. Americans don't have a clue what Obama is doing and why; even though everything he is doing is being done right in front of them.

Hussein Obama has run up $trillions in new debt.

Hussein Obama has shut down numerous coal fired electric power plants under the guise of global warming (or climate change if you are really gullible) which has led to record high electric rates

Hussein Obama is attacking Christianity in every way he can but especially through his Obamacare.

Speaking of Obamacare, it is obviously designed to cause economic hardship to the country, not improve healthcare in any way.

etc.

So why would a guy named Hussein want to hurt the US in almost everything he does? Rush Limbaugh, one of the biggest fools in history, thinks Hussein Obama hurts America because he has a leftist chip on his shoulder from his youth.

It all comes down to whether you can think or not, who is Hussein Obama and why is he viciously trying to hurt America? The answer is on the level of DUHHHHH! Can you think or do you let the presstitutes tell you the answers to everything?

16 posted on 12/13/2013 3:47:13 AM PST by politicianslie (Our first Muslim President laughs at you. Are you waiting for NBC to tell you who he is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; C. Edmund Wright

Free Trade - BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA....


17 posted on 12/13/2013 3:49:02 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

China’s testing our current Rules of Engagement.


18 posted on 12/13/2013 3:51:01 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

My guess you are pulling for the Chinese in this deal...


19 posted on 12/13/2013 3:52:15 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: urbanpovertylawcenter
China has had it's way with the U.S. since 1989. Trade deals with China became more important to POTUS than our own sovereignty and national defense.
20 posted on 12/13/2013 3:53:41 AM PST by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Bump


21 posted on 12/13/2013 3:57:00 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Ever notice how the “Free Trader” crowd stays away from these types of threads involving Chinese aggression?


22 posted on 12/13/2013 3:57:16 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

“Place your bets... “

Depends which one has permission to fire.


23 posted on 12/13/2013 3:58:32 AM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: central_va

no you idiot….we cannot control what China does…..we cannot….I know this interrupts your gay porn lifestyle to admit, but we cannot. Therefore, we have to craft our government to allow ourselves the most liberty for OUR people.

Again, we cannot control what China does. Period. Deal with it. My belief in free trade, along with every other conservative who understands anything about macro economics, is because it will maximize opportunity for all the worlds free peoples, including Americans. Our trade policy will not end China’s communism.

BTW, for your information, since you are such a lo fo, China’s economy is now much freer than ours and less communist than ours in many ways. That’s why I say the problems we have with mfg are SELF INFLICTED by our own liberalism. You are to obtuse to understand that and too arrogant to admit it.


24 posted on 12/13/2013 4:12:44 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Some of us need to wake up, make coffee, and read the article first. I’ll note that you are drawn like a magnet to slavery threads.


25 posted on 12/13/2013 4:31:55 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Just to inspire you today I will post a picture of your hero:

China’s economy is now much freer than ours and less communist than ours in many ways.

-- C. Edmund Wrong

Flights daily on Cathay Pacific, catch one...

26 posted on 12/13/2013 4:34:48 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

You speak but say noting....


27 posted on 12/13/2013 4:35:34 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: central_va; C. Edmund Wright
Looks like you have your hands full with Mr. Wright, I just thought I'd let you thrash around.

It is amusing that some "free-traders" have arrived, despite your assertion.

28 posted on 12/13/2013 4:37:37 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

You’ve arrived but which side are you on? You say nothing because low life Free Traders root for our enemies. Here’s hoping the the ChiComs nationalize every US owned factory and kick the American pig dogs out of China. MAYBE then our traitors within will finally realize not every decision is life is based on pure economics.


29 posted on 12/13/2013 4:41:18 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Maybe we should rename it something other than the “South China Sea”.


30 posted on 12/13/2013 4:44:33 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Stop trying to hijack the thread. We don't have free trade with China, and we never have. It's not a free market, either.

Asking a free-marketeer to defend our trade policy with China would be like asking a protectionist what the appropriate tariff-rate must be in order to keep naval vessels from bumping into each other.

31 posted on 12/13/2013 4:45:23 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

No don’t give China credit where it is not due.

China owns Chinese companies. American companies which make stuff in China do not own the factories.

Everything in China, belongs to China.

Bring back US manufacturing now.


32 posted on 12/13/2013 4:46:21 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“According to the officials, the Cowpens was conducting a routine operation done to exercise its freedom of navigation near the Chinese carrier when the incident occurred about a week ago.”

In other words, the US ship was acting belligerent and the Chinese ship didn’t give way


33 posted on 12/13/2013 4:48:14 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Again which side are you on? The trade imbalance with China is well documented. Do your Chinese handlers allow you to takes sides in disputed like this, or are you neutral - neutered?


34 posted on 12/13/2013 4:49:22 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Maybe we should rename it something other than the “South China Sea”.

Walmart Sea.

35 posted on 12/13/2013 4:50:35 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

((((PING))))


36 posted on 12/13/2013 4:52:03 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicianslie

Well, what the hell did you think that he meant when he said that “we are just weeks away from fundamentally changing the United States of America!” And apparently there is NO one to stop him. Disgusting.


37 posted on 12/13/2013 4:52:23 AM PST by Shane (When Injustice Becomes Law, RESISTANCE Becomes DUTY.----T.Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

To bad the US Navy didn’t get the memo about Free Trade trumps all....


38 posted on 12/13/2013 4:54:55 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
"We dare not tempt them with weakness."
John Kennedy

Millions of Americans are doing exactly that. THEY ARE FOOLS!

39 posted on 12/13/2013 4:58:26 AM PST by Savage Beast ("And may the odds be ever in your favor." IT CAN HAPPEN HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Then a Chinese tank landing ship sailed in front of the Cowpens and stopped....

Have an icebreaker accompany them next time. We need to do studies, even in warm waters due to climate change, you know.......

40 posted on 12/13/2013 4:58:29 AM PST by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

America’s military budget has hit a ceiling.

I do not see any ceiling for China’s budget.

China keeps growing bigger. We need to bring back American industry now.


41 posted on 12/13/2013 4:59:06 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

No one would have pulled this crap with Reagan. But with President Selfie, the country is now the world’s punching bag.


42 posted on 12/13/2013 4:59:22 AM PST by Flick Lives (If you like your freedom, you can keep your freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

This kind of stuff happened all the time back in the early eighties in the Indian Ocean — except in those days we were harassed by Russian Krivak destroyers.

Like the Russians were then, the Chinese are just keeping up the tension, and probing our reactions. We couldn’t do much then but perform collision avoidance, and I’m thinking we can’t do much more — and likely even less — now.


43 posted on 12/13/2013 5:01:44 AM PST by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shane

ping


44 posted on 12/13/2013 5:09:22 AM PST by shadeaud (Be strong when you are weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Excellent name since Walmart has drained from China the real outputs of labor and materials in exchange for... US Dollars!

There is no and cannot ever be a trade deficit. All trade is settled as a part of the trade. Hence the word “trade”. Stop being fooled by all this.

China is in break up mode. Their country is rapidly aging due to Socialist anti-family policies. The old guard is scared stupid over this. Their saber-rattling is proof of it.

What will China get from all this? A more powerfully armed and aggressive South Korea, Japan and perhaps the Phillipines. It will certainly drive more SE Asian countries into our sphere of influence including Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Thailand.

The Chinese aren’t behaving with confidence, but fear. Their domestic situation is such that unless they create an outside enemy their political power will end. China isn’t a rising power, but a waning one.


45 posted on 12/13/2013 5:12:20 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

You are sino-phobic…..like central_planning_va is. Your obsession should be focused on American liberalism, something you can impact. You can’t do a DAMNED THING about China….why don’t you grow up and admit it.

And I was not giving China “credit” as much as I was pointing out that in some ways….SOME WAYS….China’s business environment is freer than ours. This report came out in 2009. CNBC featured it, as did Rush, and some other sources. That’s not crediting China, that’s damning our own country.


46 posted on 12/13/2013 5:12:58 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Look moron, wanting to curb our own liberalism here at home means I am anti liberalism, not pro China. How is life with an IQ under 80? Really, I’d like to know.

On second thought, don’t tell me.


47 posted on 12/13/2013 5:14:58 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: urbanpovertylawcenter

Speaking of Chickens-—we are now going to accept chicken imports from China.

Like we cannot raise enough American chickens to keep McDonalds supplied.


49 posted on 12/13/2013 5:18:14 AM PST by Venturer (Half Staff the Flag of the US for Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chiefqc

This is what happens when our president is a

feckless coward.


50 posted on 12/13/2013 5:18:37 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 401-422 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson