Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Obama wants to sweeten the bailout for insurers under Obamacare
Washington Examiner ^ | Philip Klein

Posted on 12/05/2013 2:18:09 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

"....Starting in January, insurers will be forced to offer coverage to individuals suffering from pre-existing conditions. When drafting the legislation, lawmakers wanted to make sure that individual insurers didn’t worry about getting stuck with a disproportionate share of very sick enrollees with high medical costs. If that were to happen, it could motivate insurers to attempt to manipulate plan offerings so as to “cherry pick” the healthier participants. So lawmakers included several provisions to guard against this possibility, one being the risk corridors.

A simple way of explaining the risk corridors program is that it requires insurers to estimate their expected level of costs for providing health insurance in the following benefit year. Those insurers who have much lower costs than expected must pay a certain amount to the federal government. Those who have much-higher-than-expected costs receive money from the federal government.

As I wrote previously, the Congressional Budget Office effectively never included the program in its cost estimate for Obamacare because it assumed that the contributions from insurers would equal the payments to insurers. In other words, the CBO assumed it would be a wash and have no impact on federal deficits.

But that assumption is beginning to look a lot less likely. The program was designed to protect individual insurers against major losses, but it did not anticipate industry-wide losses, which look a lot more likely now given the implementation problems that have plagued Obamacare and have possibly deterred younger and healthier Americans from purchasing insurance. Thus, far from having no deficit impact, American taxpayers could be on the hook for a major insurance bailout.

And that bailout is about to get bigger....."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: aca; bailout; insurancecompanies; obamacare; obamacarebailout; obamacareinsurers; taxes

1 posted on 12/05/2013 2:18:09 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

If/when the housing market returns to normalcy, I’m wondering just how many people out there are going to connect the increased tax costs of doing business in that arena to PPACA [I think we ought to call it the Citizens’ Affordable Care Act :^) ]


2 posted on 12/05/2013 2:38:16 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Thank goodness we get to vote for our lawmakers. Aren’t they swell?


3 posted on 12/05/2013 2:54:49 AM PST by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Has there ever been a tax law written and implemented, supported by SCOTUS, for the express purpose of subsidizing a private industry prior to the ACA?


4 posted on 12/05/2013 3:20:22 AM PST by raybbr (I weep over my sons' future in this Godforsaken country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

The answer is yes.

If you look at seed licensing laws, you will find such an example.


5 posted on 12/05/2013 3:34:29 AM PST by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

wow, bailouts of previous bailouts. We are going exponential..


6 posted on 12/05/2013 3:46:36 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

And now there’s a tax if they make too much money. And the Feds should study Holywood for creative accounting that buries profits. Fools.


7 posted on 12/05/2013 3:53:30 AM PST by Thebaddog (Obamacare is sinking, but are we going with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Obamacare....
8 posted on 12/05/2013 4:14:33 AM PST by HarleyD (...one of his disciples, whom Jesus loved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The "problem" here is that the funds to bail out the insurance companies have to be approved by the Congress. Not that 0bama gives a d@mn about that.

And, since the insurance companies pretty well own our legislators anyway, I'm sure they'll get what they want.

9 posted on 12/05/2013 4:15:39 AM PST by Hardastarboard (Temporary tag line - RIP Paul Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

This is hardly surprising. The way the ACA law is written, the government would not cover all of the insurance industry losses in any given year. Because of this the insurance industry would naturally raise rates, perhaps massively, in the following year in order to return to profitability.

That’s how insurance works.

That’s how Death Spirals work.

So Obama wants, once again, to take “Admimistrative Action” in violation of the law to make sure this does not happen. Just pump up the money paid out to the Insuance Industry by the American taxpayer in order to keep Obamacare profitable and “Problem Solved”.

Life is good when you are not constrained by the rule of law. Mao understood that. So did Stalin. Now the idea is catching on in Washington D. C.


10 posted on 12/05/2013 4:37:48 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Remember WHO, and WHAT, it is we are dealing with here. These are not Democrats, they are RADICAL ACADEMIC SOCIALISTS...

George Wiley’s stated purpose for forming the NWRO, which today is ACORN/SEIU/OFA, was to put so many people on government programs, that it eventually crashes the system, and the White-run power structure, creating the chaotic conditions needed for the implementation of “True Socialism”. (ie, a Maoist-style dictatorship, with blacks ruling over whites).


11 posted on 12/05/2013 4:44:29 AM PST by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

You are on the right track.


12 posted on 12/05/2013 4:57:23 AM PST by Venturer (Keep Obama and you aint seen nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

How obama wants to sweeten the deal? I believe, the sweetener was already tucked into the abomocare bill that was written with the help of the insurance companies. It’s already the “law of the land”.


13 posted on 12/05/2013 5:27:30 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

He doesn’t care how much money he has to give the insurance companies to help him fix this mess. He plans on the government eventually taking everything they have, anyway.


14 posted on 12/05/2013 5:33:42 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

This is a good thing, seeing as we’ve all been so worried about the poor insurance companies lately.


15 posted on 12/05/2013 6:08:39 AM PST by Wolfie (Yes, it's a joke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson