Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attkisson: Fast and Furious Whistleblower 'Rare Example' Amidst Obama's 'War On Leaks'
Newsbusters ^ | December 2, 2013 | Matthew Balan

Posted on 12/02/2013 6:47:44 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike

Sharyl Attkisson touted 'Fast and Furious' whistleblower John Dodson as "a rare example, especially amid the Obama administration's war on leaks" during a segment on Monday's CBS This Morning. Attkisson, whose reporting on the arms trafficking scandal won CBS a Edward R. Murrow Award, spotlighted the ATF senior agent's new book on "the inside story of why he went public to expose the government's false denials about its gunwalking secrets."

The correspondent also pointed out how "there's still a court battle over the 'Fast and Furious' documents that President Obama is withholding from Congress under executive privilege". She also featured a clip from Dodson where he emphasized that this is an ongoing controversy that deserves more media attention:

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2deadfeds; 300deadmexicans; atf; banglist; brianterry; dea; dhs; doj; ericwithholder; fastandfurious; fbi; gunrunner; gunrunning; gunwalker; holder; hsi; injusticedepartment; jaimezapata; liedtocongress; murdergate; obama; obamascandals; terry; transparency; whistleblower; zapata
The other Fast & Furious the media is ignoring...
1 posted on 12/02/2013 6:47:44 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike; Joe Brower; Travis McGee; LucyT; vette6387; MetaThought; 60Gunner; XHogPilot; ...
Just when you thought....


2 posted on 12/02/2013 6:57:20 PM PST by MestaMachine (My caps work. You gotta earn them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

I didn’t think Obummer played any (official, known) role in Fast & Furious.

So how does he justify using “executive privilege” to protect communications that he never had?


3 posted on 12/02/2013 7:06:43 PM PST by DNME (Something wicked this way comes ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Impeach Now.

Thanks Hotlanta Mike.


4 posted on 12/02/2013 8:04:50 PM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


5 posted on 12/02/2013 9:04:23 PM PST by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DNME

So how does he justify using “executive privilege” to protect communications that he never had?


An independent press would have been pushing for that answer all this time. And the lawsuit against Obama to show just cause why executive privilege is warranted is continuing.


6 posted on 12/02/2013 9:18:03 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson