Skip to comments.
State Sues: Fed Rule against Felon Hiring Ban Endangers Public (Texas)
Judicial Watch ^
| November 7, 2013
Posted on 11/07/2013 10:09:30 AM PST by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
1
posted on
11/07/2013 10:09:30 AM PST
by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
The disparate impact theory has to go. Rational policies that have a non-discriminatory purpose should not be illegal.
2
posted on
11/07/2013 10:12:03 AM PST
by
p. henry
To: jazusamo
Thank God for US Court Judge, Roger Titus.
3
posted on
11/07/2013 10:13:28 AM PST
by
basil
(2ASisters.org)
To: p. henry
This is way over the top even for the 0bama/EEOC/DOJ cabal.
4
posted on
11/07/2013 10:14:18 AM PST
by
jazusamo
([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
To: basil
Absolutely, Judge Titus told it like it is.
5
posted on
11/07/2013 10:15:40 AM PST
by
jazusamo
([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
To: jazusamo
How racist of the Feds, “tarring” all minorities as criminals !
6
posted on
11/07/2013 10:16:55 AM PST
by
SecondAmendment
(Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
To: jazusamo
At least one state has gone to court to fight the Obama administrations preposterous new regulation limiting employers rights to ban hiring felons because it discriminates against minorities. That tacitly admits that they are the ones committing most of the felonies.....
7
posted on
11/07/2013 10:19:40 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Proud member of the Zeta Omicron Tau Fraternity since 2004...................)
To: Red Badger
Yep. If you or I said that, WHAT WOULD THEY CALL US?
To: basil
U.S. District Court Judge Roger Titus lambasted the administrations expert data, writing that it was laughable; based on unreliable data; rife with analytical error; containing a plethora of errors and analytical fallacies and a mind-boggling number of errors; completely unreliable; so full of material flaws that any evidence of disparate impact derived from an analysis of its contents must necessarily be disregarded; distorted; both over and under inclusive; cherry-picked; worthless; and an egregious example of scientific dishonesty. But did he like it?...............
9
posted on
11/07/2013 10:22:34 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Proud member of the Zeta Omicron Tau Fraternity since 2004...................)
Please bump the Freepathon or click above and donate or become a monthly donor!
10
posted on
11/07/2013 10:22:35 AM PST
by
jazusamo
([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
To: Red Badger
Yep, and the truth hurts.
11
posted on
11/07/2013 10:23:27 AM PST
by
jazusamo
([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
To: CivilWarBrewing
12
posted on
11/07/2013 10:23:35 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Proud member of the Zeta Omicron Tau Fraternity since 2004...................)
To: p. henry
Rape laws have a disparate impact against rapists.
Yeah, that’s leftard ‘logic’ for ya.
13
posted on
11/07/2013 10:29:29 AM PST
by
TurboZamboni
(Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
To: basil
I nominate him for the next SCOTUS judge.
To: jazusamo
So I want to open store. I am liable for any violence my employee may inflict on a customer or other employee, I will take a loss if my employee steals cash or inventory, yet the gov’t is telling me I can’t refuse to hire convicted felons because too many of them are minorities?
Why would anyone want to start a business in this country anymore?
To: Red Badger
LOL
He gave it a 3. Doesn't rhyme and it's hard to dance to.
16
posted on
11/07/2013 10:57:47 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
To: Rusty0604
You do—and I’ll Second you!
17
posted on
11/07/2013 11:01:24 AM PST
by
basil
(2ASisters.org)
|
Free Republic needs your help. Thank you all very much for your prayers and your continuing support!! Your loyal support keeps FR alive and is truly and greatly appreciated. Thank you!!
|
|
|
|
18
posted on
11/07/2013 11:17:18 AM PST
by
RedMDer
(Happy with this, America? Make your voices heard. 2014 is just around the corner. ~ Sarah Palin)
To: jazusamo
Try applying for liability insurance. You get the high-risk, or no insurance at all, if you hire felons.
19
posted on
11/07/2013 11:30:56 AM PST
by
fruser1
To: Rusty0604
So I want to open store. I am liable for any violence my employee may inflict on a customer or other employee, I will take a loss if my employee steals cash or inventory, yet the govt is telling me I cant refuse to hire convicted felons because too many of them are minorities? Why would anyone want to start a business in this country anymore?
You just hit the nail on the head.
Obama and his fellow travelers don't want any businesses in this country other than the big ones that drink from the government trough, since they are controllable. Small business can't be controlled and, in fact, liberates its owners if they are successful. THEY control their life, THEY decide what to sell and to whom, THEY decide who to hire and fire, and THEY decide which pols act in THEIR best interest.
We can't have any of that freedom stuff in the USSA - it'll enable the terrorist Tea Party types!
20
posted on
11/07/2013 11:33:51 AM PST
by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson