To: basil
U.S. District Court Judge Roger Titus lambasted the administrations expert data, writing that it was laughable; based on unreliable data; rife with analytical error; containing a plethora of errors and analytical fallacies and a mind-boggling number of errors; completely unreliable; so full of material flaws that any evidence of disparate impact derived from an analysis of its contents must necessarily be disregarded; distorted; both over and under inclusive; cherry-picked; worthless; and an egregious example of scientific dishonesty. But did he like it?...............
9 posted on
11/07/2013 10:22:34 AM PST by
Red Badger
(Proud member of the Zeta Omicron Tau Fraternity since 2004...................)
To: Red Badger
LOL
He gave it a 3. Doesn't rhyme and it's hard to dance to.
16 posted on
11/07/2013 10:57:47 AM PST by
TigersEye
(Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson