Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Gay Rights' is Trojan Horse for Totalitarianism
VictoriaJackson.com ^ | 10-12-13 | Victoria Jackson

Posted on 10/15/2013 6:07:55 PM PDT by ReformationFan

Brilliant observation by WND’s David Kupelian – The ‘gay rights’ movement is a trojan horse for totalitarianism. He explores this in the October issue of Whistleblower available here. A “Trojan Horse” is “any trick or stratagem that causes a target to invite a foe into a securely protected bastion or space.” (Wiki)

WND Story here.

David Kupelian says, “this particular issue – this revolutionary sexual anarchy movement, which more than any other ideology, including Marxism, Islam or atheism, has the potential of permanently corrupting our nation’s core ‘operating system’ called the family – is the one issue that almost everybody is afraid to confront.”

Breitbart told me, “There is no ‘gay agenda’. There is a Marxist agenda and they are using the “victimization of gays” movement to achieve their ends. Gays aren’t victims.”

I think everyone has an agenda. Homosexuals want their lifestyle validated. Marxists want to replace America’s free enterprise system with a totalitarian utopia. Globalists want a one world government ruled by an elite few. Islam wants the world controlled by Sharia Law. Christians are commanded to spread the gospel throughout the world, “to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.” Secular Humanists are looking out for number one.

Kupelian writes, “When it (The Sexual Revolution) started, who could possibly have known it would turn out like this?

(Excerpt) Read more at victoriajackson.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: breitbart; homosexualagenda; jackson; marxism; ohgoodlord; religiousliberty; religiouspersecution; totalitarianism; victoriajackson

1 posted on 10/15/2013 6:07:55 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

“Hi, I’m from the government and I’m here to...”


2 posted on 10/15/2013 6:09:19 PM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2016: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Victoriaaaaaaaa Jackson.

She was funny on Carson.


3 posted on 10/15/2013 6:10:13 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

“When it (The Sexual Revolution) started, who could possibly have known it would turn out like this?”

uh, anyone with a passing knowledge of history and a deep understanding of the Bible.


4 posted on 10/15/2013 6:10:42 PM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

...and Hugh Hefner is treated like a hero.

Making women objects was the mode, making people “things”...tools to be used for pleasure.

Sounds like a 19th century practice endorsed by Democrats.

What was it called again??? Oh, that’s right: slavery.

Of course, this was dressed up on slick paper and with pretty faces that claimed the objectification wasn’t happening.


5 posted on 10/15/2013 6:13:10 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Bump


6 posted on 10/15/2013 6:15:59 PM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

She’s hilarious and I’m glad she’s on our side.


7 posted on 10/15/2013 6:17:04 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

The whole premise of “gay rights” is flawed. You have to assume that gender is an invalid differentiator for government regulation and law when the law is filled to the brim with laws specific to women and men especially. You also have to believe that freewill is nonexistent. That one because they have a desire for something that is incorrect that one can not be expected not to indulge in said behavior. Gay behavior is inferior and harmful in comparison to heterosexual behavior. It is extremely detrimental to the ability of a human being to reproduce and therefore is inherently harmful. It is from a Darwinian equivalent to committing genetic suicide.

Homosexuality and the whole alternative lifestyle movement was contrived to deconstruct the family which is the backbone of a stable society. We already see the breakdown all around caused by shrunken family size and more and more single parent households. The more alternative family structures whether they are bastardized heterosexual families or homosexual the cost of accommodating and neutrality towards the so called “modern family” is an ever larger more intrusive government. Unintuitive family structures also demand that the government suppress any natural opposition to them and that is exactly what we are seeing with increasing attacks on religious freedom and issues of conscience.

People who say gay rights doesn’t affect anyone are just in denial or they simply support the totalitarian political correctness of the rising gayocracy.


8 posted on 10/15/2013 6:20:52 PM PDT by Maelstorm (The political class love diversity and choice only when the its choices they approve of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan
If people can be persuaded to swallow the lie that homosexuality is normal, they can be persuaded to swallow any lie.

This creates an atmosphere where lies of all kinds are accepted.

9 posted on 10/15/2013 6:21:39 PM PDT by matt1234 (obamacare: the "New Coke" of the 21st Century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

“The sexual anarchy movement”

Very true label for what this is.
And notice each stage has been marked with psychopaths.

In the 60s, the era of free love, communal sex, birth control, etc. We had the Manson Family commune go down to Hollywood and murder 8 individuals brutally, one of them an unborn child.

In the 90s, the beginning of the rise for homosexuals after the AIDS scare, Jeffrey Dahmer slaughtered 17 other homosexuals, who he then sodomized after death before eating them.

In the 00’s and beyond, pedophilia is now being defended in British newspapers as an ‘orientation like any other’, it’s being defended by Richard Dawkins as not ‘damaging’, teacher rapists are avoiding prison even after their victims commit suicide, and pro-abort advocates are more shrill than ever. What do we see?
Jerry Sandusky’s crimes are obscured by a media witch hunt against Joe Paterno, a witch hunt that ended up killing him, and in Killadelphia, a junior Mengele has taken out fully formed babies and cut their throats open. Countless babies suffered this fate, but the president would rather address a controversial self-defense case in which someone who could have been his son was killed.

I can only imagine the Amish (whose society has suffered no dramatic social change since the 1950s) shake their heads and thank God they never embraced sexual anarchy. What hath the devil wrought?


10 posted on 10/15/2013 6:28:57 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

We live in a country where killing unborn people hasn’t been considered a crime by the state for 40+ years. It’s not shocking in my opinion that the state’s definition of marriage keeps getting more and more ridiculous, or that those that disagree with the state’s definition of marriage will be punished for it.

Freegards


11 posted on 10/15/2013 6:30:49 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Homosexual “rights” are now indistinguishable from a protection racket.


12 posted on 10/15/2013 6:41:35 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Indeed. It’s difficult for me to see if someone thinks gender is utterly inconsequential to marriage, then how can they oppose any other sexual deviation from God’s standard?


13 posted on 10/15/2013 6:44:31 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan
Aren't there rules for this?


14 posted on 10/15/2013 7:28:53 PM PDT by MuttTheHoople (Nothing is more savage and brutal than justifiably angry Americans. DonÂ’t believe me? Ask the Germa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MuttTheHoople

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05iBYc5WjpU


15 posted on 10/15/2013 8:35:32 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson