Posted on 10/05/2013 4:29:58 PM PDT by lbryce
See post # 40. Maybe you’ll get a better perspective on just exactly what my intentions were.
If you’re intention is to make a point, or upbraid me for whatever, it would help if you were more specific regarding the “canard” you claim I subscribe to.
The canard to which I refer is that of using the 14th amendment to unilaterally raise the debt ceiling via executive branch action, the theme of this thread.
It’s typical to direct responses to someone who posts a thread, understanding that they’re directed at the author of said thread.
IMHO
Mark Levin has been warning us on this issue. Once the Presdent seizes this power the legislative branch is dead and we are in full bodied tyranny.
Obama has no authority to spend. So, why would he have to borrow?
Yeah, I was wondering the same thing...
Is no one in the media or congress going to call him on this? (I know, I know... it is a rhetorical question...)
And I agree: if he tries anything autocratic to “deal” with this, articles of impeachment should be filed immediately. This bozo is insane, truly insane.
Yeh. you’re right. May you live in interesting times is not a curse. It’s a warning to be aware and get ready.
Our Chinese students back in 1989 passed that warning back and forth.
For people who don’t remember, that SOB traitor George Bush Sr. pledged to expose all Chinese students in the US who backed the Tienamen uprising,
We shipped thousands of FAX machines to the students.
We also set up thousands of safehouses for Chinese students here in America.
George Bush Sr. should be hanged from a lamppost. I hate that NWO MF.
The reality of the situation is exactly the opposite. Don't think the donks don't know it, too.
But of course. Absolutely. It's a given. Your explanation, while most considerate, thoughtful was superfluous as I had mistakenly taken your comment, that old canard, as one being directed at me, personally, for something I might have said, wondering what canard was it that I posted that had me pose my response to you in the confused manner i did, the reality of which was that your comment was addressed to the President.
I apologize for having made the error in the misinterpretation your comment.
You are right. Levin discussed this on his radio show.
With the October 17 deadline to raise the debt limit rapidly approaching, President Obama is not specifically ruling out using the 14th Amendment to increase the nation’s borrowing ability if the political impasse continues and Congress fails to do so, but says he does not expect the fight to get to that point.
Article I, Section 7, which states that “All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives;
I’m fairly certain “raising the debt ceiling” has the same definition of revenue, that is; the total amount of money received by the government for goods or services provided during a certain time frame.
In reality you are absolutely correct, but politically I’m not so sure....the media is always banging the Dems drum for them. Please tell me how your coming to this conclusion. I’m curious.
As for the person of questionable ancestry in our White House, it would not surprise me at all to see him trample yet another part of our Constitution.
However, that still doesn't allow the 14th amendment's statement "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, ... shall not be questioned" to override Article I, Section 8 "The Congress shall have power ... To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;" That power is given to Congress and only Congress.
Continuing to borrow past the debt limit is a clear violation of Article I, and any federal judge should quash it immediately, but so many are actively anti-Constitutional (cough, Chief Justice Roberts, cough) that I wouldn't be surprised to see that clear statement ignored.
You’re awesome. Thank you.
Welcome to the andyk-lbryce Mutual Admiration Society. :-)
But you’re awesomer.
“Is he going to declare the Republicans in a state of rebellion?”
From this crowd of Radical Socialists, it would not be beyond the pale.
And that should scare the living hell out of you.
“May you live in interesting times and come to the attention of important people”. This is how I always heard it. Gives a more sinister connotation
Who would loan funds to the US government that any future President and/or Congress could repudiate with impunity, because no court would force the US to repay such an Unconstitutional debt because it was never authorized by law (Act of Congress)?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.