Skip to comments.Sen. Lindsey Graham to seek authorization for U.S. attack on Iran
Posted on 09/19/2013 5:10:52 PM PDT by steelhead_trout
click here to read article
He got a big old donation from some hawks and needs to implement his “marching orders”.
Note to Lindsley. You are an ( 0 ) - Another war, expending blood and treasure alone as world policeman. AYOOYFM? We’re broke.
We need “boobs on the ground”- send Goober .
I digress but I wrote about this years ago. Those underground facilities are just post holes and root cellars if they don’t have large quantities of electricity. Since they love the twelfth century so much the fastest way for them to get there would be to take out their electric generation. No electric-—no nuclear program-—nothing. Then we could watch them scramble and see what is really important to them.
he’s in trouble in the next primary he faces and he’s trying to score “bonus” points as if to say “my policy on Iran is bigger than yours” - for what, has Iran attacked the U.S.???
I am beginning to wonder. McCain was willing to get us into it with Russia over Georgia (and Georgia was the bad guy)!
When you hear these guys and their dwindling neocon supporters saying we need to bomb Syria so we will be respected / feared, you're hearing insanity. Grownups can't possibly think that. Are these guys subject to serious security clearances?
We need to get rid of light in the loafers Lindsey sooner not later.
Does the Senate have an exile island???
Brave little faggot aint he. He’s gonna lead the troops right? put his candy @$$ out there on the line?
...then shut up Nancy!!!
The problem again is the people of SC. 42 percent back him no matter what, and that’s a majority in SC because he can easily convince the extra 9 percent to come aboard.
...believes the diplomatic path chosen by the administration will lead to a debacle.Yes, of course it will.
1. The reason ohaha has not taken on Syria is because he has come down on the side of Iran ever since he stepped foot in office, much to the chagrine of the saudis, whereas mccain and graham fall on the side of the saudis. ohaha has been between a rock and a hard place trying to walk the fine line between the two, but it ain’t working.
2. gw was a saudi guy and ohaha has given Iraq to iran as well as afghanistan.
What about the annihilation of Iran and all its people? Linda, if it’s worth doing let’s git er dun, what say you?
...believes the diplomatic path chosen by the administration will lead to a debacle.
Yes, of course it will.
Pretty sure that is the goal of the Soros Administration, as led by Comrade Jarrett.
Well, you know?! I’ve been wondering the same thing. Are they THAT drunk with love of power and money that they’d turn Hanoi Jane on us? Or is it more than that? It’ll come out one day, i suppose.
For the record, Zero’s foreign policy has been atrocious, but GW gave Iraq to Iran by deposing the one man who could stand up to it, Saddam Hussein. Once he was gone, the Shiite majority took over, and we know where their loyalties lie. As for Afghanistan, it will forever be no man’s land, and if the Shiite Persians try running the show there, well, good luck with that. And sorry, but W didn’t do a whole lot to stop nuke development in either Iran or North Korea.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.