Posted on 09/18/2013 1:59:50 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
Well, get ready for it to continue to get more dangerous - at least for three more years or so.
The best way to fix a broken system is to SHUT IT DOWN, and THEN fix it.
Newt SHUT DOWN the US Federal Government in the 1990’s and it WORKED!
The Liberal Agenda Media and the Democrats boo-hooed to this day, but Newt achieved success.
_____________________
The only way to force a spoiled brat to behave is to punish, punish, punish.
The worst punishment that a Democrat, or RINO can imagine is to take away their ability to spend our tax dollars.
The best way to do that is to shutdown the non-essental parts of the US Federal Government, starting with mothballing Air Force One.
Hopefully Nov 2014 results might lessen tge impact
Why not have the true Republicans require a BINDING, updated, “Federal Financial Impact Statement” for 2012-2013 for Obama”care?”
It should take a month or two to complete, allow for a vote to delay Obama”care” for a year, and then show the great financial harm to our Economy that the Statement’s numbers will document.
Wharton, Stanford, Michigan and Princeton could also file their independent Financial Impact Statements to compare to the Office of Budget and the Congressional Budget Office Financial Impact Statements.
As B. Hussein is fond of saying: “We need to get all the facts first.”
If the touchstone is U.S. national security then why does he want to spend billions on an anti-ballistic missile system that doesn't protect the U.S.?
It's not whether American leads, it's the direction.
The man is presidential material, but the voting majority can’t process unchewed facts, they are baby birds sitting in a nest with mouths open for mommy, daddy and media to puke into their waiting mouths.
We like in sad times, with sad and stupid citizens.
We shoot be able to shoot down enemy missiles anywhere in the world the moment they're launched.
I also hope 2014 might lessen, or at least slow, the damage to our country.
Russian missiles aimed at us won't come over Europe. They'll come over the pole or the north Pacific.
What one leads in is more important than just “leading.”
Ted Cruz Ping!
New world order loves complex international security agreements and commitments.
He is 100% right on that statement!
It does - the launch phase, when the missiles are gathering speed, is when they are most vulnerable. This is why the Poles aren't thrilled about them, and exacted a pretty high price for allowing them to be based there - they protect us, but will draw saturation (nuclear) attacks if the balloon goes up.
These interceptors are for missiles from Iran.
The first question I would have is that if these are to defend Europe from Iran then why does Cruz think that building it will send a message to Russia? The second question is, what missiles? There are no missiles from Iran capable of reaching the U.S. And the chances that there ever will be are non-existent. There longest ranged missile comes up short of the U.S. by about 6000 miles.
Any missiles that the Russians launch at us which are not submarine based will be launched from central Russian, thousands of miles away from the interceptors. And they'll travel over the pole, in the opposite direction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.