Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Surprise, surprise: Topless feminist group actually run by a bro who loves hot women
The Daily Caller ^ | 9/6/2013

Posted on 09/06/2013 4:24:12 PM PDT by markomalley

Radical group Femen is mainly known for staging topless media stunts to protest oppression. And while they’ve been presented as a feminist female empowerment group, a new documentary revealed that the group is actually run by a man who happens to love hot topless women.

Victor Svyatski is listed as a consultant for the group, however filmmaker Kitty Green — who just completed the documentary “Ukraine is Not a Brothel” about the group — says that Svyatski is more of the mastermind behind the stunts.

Green told The Independent, “It’s his movement and he hand-picked the girls. He hand-picked the prettiest girls because the prettiest girls sell more papers. The prettiest girls get on the front page… that became their image, that became the way they sold the brand.”

While the public persona of the group touts female empowerment, Svyatski seems to believe the opposite. In the film he says, “These girls are weak.” He adds, “They don’t have the strength of character. They don’t even have the desire to be strong. Instead, they show submissiveness, spinelessness, lack of punctuality, and many other factors which prevent them from becoming political activists. These are qualities which it was essential to teach them.”

One of the members of Femen describes their relationship to Svyatski as being akin to Stockholm Syndrome. She told Green, “We are psychologically dependent on him and even if we know and understand that we could do this by ourselves without his help, it’s psychological dependence.”

Their slogan is, “Our mission is protest, our weapons are bare breasts.” So is it really that far fetched to think it was a man who decided a good form of protest was having hot girls take their tops off?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: blog; bloggers; chat; femen; leavefemenalone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: IronJack

HAHAHAHAHAHA


21 posted on 09/06/2013 4:44:06 PM PDT by rlmorel (Silence: The New Hate Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
a man who happens to love hot topless women.

That could easily be the most redundant sentence ever uttered.

22 posted on 09/06/2013 4:44:28 PM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

topless sluts on the march


23 posted on 09/06/2013 4:46:06 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
these guys right here are offended by your comment.  photo 354986253_oZVta-M-1.jpg
24 posted on 09/06/2013 4:47:33 PM PDT by barmag25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Virtually ALL "feminists" are simply used by men, and the women think they are "independent" and "in control of our own bodies".....men have bamboozled them into being easy pickin's, with NO COMMITTMENT at all for casual sex at NO COST.

ROFL

25 posted on 09/06/2013 4:54:26 PM PDT by traditional1 (Amerika.....Providing public housing for the Mulatto Messiah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barmag25

Where do all these gays come from? What’s going on? How can so many men be totally at odds with the design of their own bodies? An anus is NOT a sexual organ! I really don’t think anyone has gotten to the bottom (no pun intended) of this recent maniacal emphasis on homosexuality. Is it fear of women? Self-loathing? Hatred of their mothers? Of their fathers? What? Are the chem-trail conspirators right and are chemicals being dumped on us to push men into gayness to avoid overpopulation? What is going on?


26 posted on 09/06/2013 4:56:56 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Its not that their numbers have increased they are just being used as the next Victim of capitalism that progressives are marching out there to help destroy families and Christianity.
Its a Gramsci thing.


27 posted on 09/06/2013 5:00:57 PM PDT by barmag25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
I really don’t think anyone has gotten to the bottom (no pun intended) of this recent maniacal emphasis on homosexuality.

It is the extremely rich who first sponsored the homosexual "liberation," particularly the Rockefeller Foundation. The goal was depopulation and depravity of the middle class, such that there are only the rich and those they control, completely.

28 posted on 09/06/2013 5:05:48 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers choices: convert, submit, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Liking hot topless women is not my definition of perversion.


29 posted on 09/06/2013 5:06:25 PM PDT by lightman (Prosecute the heresies; pity the heretics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: barmag25
Its a Gramsci thing.

I just read an entire volume of Gramsci's work and there was plenty on how to induce transformation of a society gradually, but I didn't find any reference to the destruction of the nuclear family by sexual depravity as a particular goal. Believe me, I was looking for it.

Yet before Gramsci it was a Sabbatean thing.

30 posted on 09/06/2013 5:10:01 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers choices: convert, submit, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

31 posted on 09/06/2013 5:14:03 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

I don’t think that was a way gramsci thought he could destroy families. My post was badly worded I guess. Progressives are using gays as a way to undermine Christianity in America.


32 posted on 09/06/2013 5:17:48 PM PDT by barmag25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: barmag25
I don’t think that was a way gramsci thought he could destroy families.

The Rockefellers clearly did. I'm reading more on that history now in a compilation from a Congressional investigation back in the late 50s.

Progressives are using gays as a way to undermine Christianity in America.

And then some.

33 posted on 09/06/2013 5:20:08 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers choices: convert, submit, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

It’s society, and the modern world. The “smaller” the world gets, the easier it is to share ideas. People that are “on the fence” about being gay, are easily more influenced by the gay agenda.

It’s the same with any idea, the faster it travels, the more minds it can reach in a shorter time. If you can utilize and control this “flow of information” efficiently. You can sway opinions, and FACTS (don’t ever forget this).

The left seems to utilize the net, entertainment, and media better than the right, and I believe it comes down to one cause. Most of the left WILL fight dirty: blackmail, bribery, coercion, perhaps in some instances even murder.
Now I’m not saying that the right will not resort to Chicago politics(mob politics). But the right has to be more hesitant than the left, when committing crimes to fulfill their goals. Just look at the state of our leftist government, all of us here know that they are criminals, willing to do ANYTHING to get their way. The media is currently NOT reporting on barely ANY of the scandals that would bring a conservative President down.

It’s all about control, whoever controls the information outlets controls the people, is what I’m saying. I’m right too. Surely you have seen the picture of the connections between high ranking WH officials and news media players. Same thing happens in Hollywood. For the left it’s all about “what can you give me if I play ball”? Which leads to greed, selfishness, etc. The GOP members that follow this aren’t really republicans, and they do not belong on our side of the political spectrum.


34 posted on 09/06/2013 5:20:50 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

It is very strange that the Rockefeller Foundation funded the pervert Kinsey. There is something really weird going on. Some people say that the money kept in the family trusts cannot be controlled by the family members and so the leftists got into these foundations and took them over but that seems like such a weak excuse. With all the power and money that the Rockefellers have they could get the laws changed to keep hostile forces from running away with their family trusts. After all the Rockefellers are hardly shrinking violets.


35 posted on 09/06/2013 5:21:02 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

It is very strange that the Rockefeller Foundation funded the pervert Kinsey. There is something really weird going on. Some people say that the money kept in the family trusts cannot be controlled by the family members and so the leftists got into these foundations and took them over but that seems like such a weak excuse. With all the power and money that the Rockefellers have they could get the laws changed to keep hostile forces from running away with their family trusts. After all the Rockefellers are hardly shrinking violets.


36 posted on 09/06/2013 5:21:02 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

I imagine it’s pretty hard to find a horde of ugly girls in Ukraine.


37 posted on 09/06/2013 5:21:11 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom; Jim Robinson
It is very strange that the Rockefeller Foundation funded the pervert Kinsey.

It's well documented from multiple sources. I'll have more to say when I finish Wormser's book. Honestly, I haven't ever heard it mentioned on FR and for the life of me I cannot understand why.

38 posted on 09/06/2013 5:29:08 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers choices: convert, submit, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

I purchased both volumes of “To Eliminate the Opiate” which you recommended to me last year. I would say to everyone who likes to delve into the historical roots of things, get these books. The Sabbateans were a group of renegades from the Jewish religion back in the 16 hundreds. Many of the anti-God idealogies such as Communism developed from many of their beliefs.


39 posted on 09/06/2013 5:30:00 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

I purchased both volumes of “To Eliminate the Opiate” which you recommended to me last year. I would say to everyone who likes to delve into the historical roots of things, get these books. The Sabbateans were a group of renegades from the Jewish religion back in the 16 hundreds. Many of the anti-God idealogies such as Communism developed from many of their beliefs.


40 posted on 09/06/2013 5:30:00 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson