Posted on 09/04/2013 4:13:15 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Washington is weighing expanding support for Syrian rebels by having the Pentagon take charge of arming the opposition instead of a clandestine effort by the CIA, officials said Wednesday.
"It's under consideration," said a US official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
"If and how (it would be done) are both questions being discussed," the official told AFP.
NO! Don’t Arm Them!
Ambassador Stevens?
The al Nusra Front is Al Qaeda, a short sight worse than the Muslim Brotherhood.
Funny how we will arm the brotherhood or al qaeda, but take your weapons away.
Thanks Oldeconomybuyer.
Why the U.S. [CIA] Still Hasn’t Armed Syrian Rebels
wsj | Updated September 2, 2013, 9:01 p.m. ET | By ADAM ENTOUS and NOUR MALAS
Posted on 09/04/2013 8:57:34 AM PDT by dennisw
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3062494/posts
Arming your enemies is treason.
clandestine effort by the CIA = Obama’s illegal gun running operation in Benghazi?
Arms for al-Qaeda... I am truly amazed. And nobody (outside of us right-wing bitter clingers) even so much as peeps in protest.
Just digging another 9/11 grave.
al Qaeda apparently SUCCESSFULLY bombed the Pentagon into
full submission mode.
===> The American people are on their own.
“Arming your enemies is treason.”
Enemies of whom, the American people or its government?
Increasingly becoming two quite different entities.
Gas Cylinders Mounted on Shells and Fired by FSA Terrorists against the Syrian Army
Gas Cylinders Mounted on Shells and Fired by @SenJohnMcCain Moderates in Syria
Well, the DHS certainly seems to have >50% of Americans in their sights.
I guess whatever the “Arabs” financing this action want, they get. Courtesy of the Muslim Brotherhood White House.
AS USUAL ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS MESS IS EXPLAINED BY ANNIE COULTER...NUFF SAID.
Great. Just great.
So King Zero will come out in the open and just give straight supply of chemical weapons to those who want to kill us after they finish with Syria? Is this his way of trying to give our military a bad name?
Zero is doing a great job of destroying America's credibility overseas. I believe it was all in the plan even before he got elected.
What? The dems would successfuly turn it around politically and say “Iraq gassed 10X as many people (Kurds) while Reagan was in office and he did nothing”. Is that the brilliant point Coulter is making? :-) She will have to do better than that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.