To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
“King hussein heads to Dizzyland after successful bombing run.” Yup, he’s been bombing for over 4 years now.
2 posted on
09/04/2013 11:18:21 AM PDT by
rktman
(Inergalactic background checks? King hussein you're first up.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"in the wake of last week's horrific chemical weapons attack in a suburb of Damascus" Note that the authors do not attribute the gassing to one side or the other.
Bombs away anyhow!
3 posted on
09/04/2013 11:22:02 AM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Cram black misbehavior down their throats until they change.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
5 posted on
09/04/2013 11:26:00 AM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
(Jeremiah 50:32 "The arrogant one will stumble and fall ; / ?)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Obama will say he is reluctantly backing down from bombing Syria because it will release an illegal amount of CO2 and contribute to Global Warming.
7 posted on
09/04/2013 11:29:34 AM PDT by
Iron Munro
("You bring me the man, I'll find you the crime" - Lavrentiy Beria [and Eric Holder])
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Who has control over Syria’s WMDs if Assad is defeated Mr. President?
9 posted on
09/04/2013 11:35:56 AM PDT by
McGruff
(Strange times are these in which we live...)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Bombing a country to make a point....
... is defined as terrorism.
11 posted on
09/04/2013 11:36:56 AM PDT by
GeronL
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
THIS is the right question.
Not the detective work on which Syrian a-holes gassed which other Syrian a-holes, but WHY would a couple of our missiles do anything to stop whoever it was from doing it again, and if nothing, what is our strategic objective in the region and how does missiling some Syrian Defense ministry buildings accomplish it?
Obama’s idiotic “red-line” did nothing and neither will his haphazard missile launch, if he even gets to do it.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
You'd think the mainstream "news" media would be discussing this, but no, a Dem is Prez, not a Repub. Wouldn't want to embarrass their selected boy-king wannabe.
It is an interesting question, though: what will King Zero do if he sends in the military and it has no effect? From experience, he will blame everyone and everything except himself and his own policies.
15 posted on
09/04/2013 11:53:56 AM PDT by
jeffc
(The U.S. media are our enemy)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Yemen has to be next. Sudan is already pretty bad so no work to do there.
17 posted on
09/04/2013 12:01:16 PM PDT by
MtnClimber
(0-Bomb-a-Nation. Resist we much!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
So you've bombed Syria. What next? Now that you did nothing but lob a few missiles and killed Innocent people. And did nothing to his military and their arms. Great job. Kerry, the nut Vietnam hero, and King Obama, the communists black Muslim.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Why is it OK to kill women and children with Cruise Missiles, but not Sarin Gas ?\
Dead is dead, is this not true ?
22 posted on
09/04/2013 12:09:25 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(The monsters are due on Maple Street)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
So You've Bombed Syria. What Next? Let guess.. another round of golf?
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
What next? Reap the whirlwind.
27 posted on
09/04/2013 12:50:22 PM PDT by
DManA
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
No one has considered that Syria’s Air Defense systems were supplied by Russia, and probably manned by Russians. What will happen when we start killing Russians??
28 posted on
09/04/2013 1:17:56 PM PDT by
simka
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson