Obama tricks the US military into winning Jihad for Al Qaeda, The Muslim Brotherhood and helps establish the global caliphate.
Posted on 09/02/2013 10:58:41 AM PDT by DTA
Meanwhile, the media has spread new proofs of the U.S. intelligence involvement to chemical attack near Damascus. Hacker got access to U.S. intelligence correspondence and published U.S. Army Col. ANTHONY J. MACDONALD’s mail. Macdonald is General Staff Director, Operations and Plans Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence the Army Staff. It’s about chemical attack in Syria.
In the message August 22 Eugene Furst congratulates Col. on successful operation and refers him to Wasington Post publication about chemical attack in Syria. From the Anthony’s wife dialog with her friend it’s clear the video with the children killed in the chemical attack near Damascus was staged by U.S. Intelligence.
(Excerpt) Read more at my.telegraph.co.uk ...
Sad that we have to go to the Daily Mail, and Telegraph to get news about the US, but it is the very first paper I read in the morning.
Hm. I thought this story was ‘discredited’.
Our US Intel Agencies have lost all credibility.
James Clapper, head of NSA was caught red handed lying to congress
and the American people.
It was! Obama came out and said it was not true. That the US is in no way involved in setting things up to give us an excuse to go to war and replace Assad with the Muslim Brotherhood. Honest
Astounding. WIFE-INT reported via the Brits' open source.
Obama tricks the US military into winning Jihad for Al Qaeda, The Muslim Brotherhood and helps establish the global caliphate.
I would just caution that this a blog by an unknown contributor. It may or may not be true. Worth considering, but not certain.
It wouldn’t really surprise me—but it’s not a real article in the Telegraph newspaper.
Nobody uses propaganda to the degree the people in the Middle-East do, and I'm not convinced the media sleuths are capable of avoiding all the pitfalls.
If it does turn out to be true, I will be angry about it. I'm just not going to jump on this bandwagon until every bit of it has been vetted.
RAMIREZ
In his latest Ramirez covers:
Syria Denies Using Chemical Weapons
bkmark
This is proof!
The proof needed to impeach Obama.
The proof that will see him convicted of a War Crime.
Even the Daily Telegraph has minimum journalistic standards for the rag that it is, and wouldn't use terms like
"Under the circumstances the U.S. is ready once again to violate international law..."
Without some evidence.
Even if this is NOT true, Obama (Kerry, Biden, Clinton, Rice, etc) have so ruined America’s reputation in the world, it will be believed the US had a hand in the attack.
Heck, I believe it could have happened. I do not trust the govt of Obama.
So they lie to Americans and Congress,
but IGNORE the Boston terrorists BEFORE THE FACT.
Meanwhile, they lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie
and set WMD to al Qaeda. This cannot end well.
They're pikers compared to this administration.
This is not proof....newbie.
This “source” isn’t even from the Telegraph. It was posted on a blog site hosted by the Telegraph. The sourcing on FR Syria threads has been extremely loose over the past week. One post sourced the Tehran Times. When I questioned that they offered a second source. The second source was from the Russian Times website!
They're about as reliable as the New York Times.
Thick Fog out there!
LOL, can you really call it propaganda when it gets to that level?
I suppose it is, but the scope and volume, it just seems underwhelming to reference it as propaganda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.