Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Death of Populism (Victor Davis Hanson, "...no politician speaks for the common man.)
National Review Online ^ | AUGUST 1, 2013 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 08/01/2013 10:53:17 AM PDT by neverdem

Plenty of pleaders for rich and poor, but no politician speaks for the common man.

Occupy Wall Streeters claimed that they were populists. Their ideological opposites, the Tea Partiers, said they were, too. Both became polarizing. And so far populism, whether on the right or left, does not seem to have made inroads with the traditional Republican and Democrat establishments.

Gas has gone up about $2 a gallon since Barack Obama took office. Given average yearly rates of national consumption, that increase alone translates into an extra $1 trillion that American drivers have collectively paid in higher fuel costs over the last 54 months.

Such a crushing burden on the cash-strapped commuter class is rarely cited in the liberal fixation on cap-and-trade, wind and solar subsidies, and the supposed dangers of fracking.

When the president scaled back the number of new gas and oil leases on federal lands over time, or warned that “under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket,” he was appealing to his boutique base — not to those who can scarcely meet their monthly heating and cooling bills.

Should there not be an opening for a conservative populist response?

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: populism; vdh; victordavishanson
The Country Party
1 posted on 08/01/2013 10:53:17 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Be careful what you wish for, VDH

Populism WILL come roaring back with power and fury.
Only it might not take a course we’d necessarily approve of.

I’m thinking President Fauxahontas and her platform of weekly televised floggings of bankers, live from Yankee Stadium.


2 posted on 08/01/2013 10:55:31 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Populism is just catching the wave of whatever’s in vogue with the majority of an area or country at the moment. It is a “taking advantage” of current sentiment kind of platform. Not one that really is founded in anything.

At the extreme it could mirror angry mob rule.


3 posted on 08/01/2013 10:57:36 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I want a candidate who will run against crony capitalism. Against Solyndra and the "green the color of tax dollars" crowd. Against the financial bailouts. Against what Ayn Rand called "the aristocracy of pull," or in Chicago terms "the aristocracy of clout."

One question the candidate should have for prospective presidential appointees: Are you now, or have you ever been, an employee of Goldman Sachs? If you are appointed, will you agree never to accept employment from them?

Similarly for the other "too big to fail, too big to jail" financial institutions. And the Chinese government and its subsidiaries. And the Saudis.

4 posted on 08/01/2013 11:01:40 AM PDT by omega4412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"No politician speaks for the common man."

President Hoover expressed his disdain for the "cult of the common man" in On the Uncommon Man.

5 posted on 08/01/2013 11:08:20 AM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Reagan had a sort of conservative populist approach. Obviously, populism can just be a matter of using the mob (stirred up by free goodies) to enact one’s oppressive policies, but I think a conservative populism - that is, a campaign based on the issues that concern people who work for a living, such as taxes, crony capitalism and government corruption, Obama’s destruction of their health care, etc. could work.


6 posted on 08/01/2013 11:09:02 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
“Plenty of pleaders for rich and poor, but no politician speaks for the common man.”

Conservatives like Ted Cruz do.

Take gas prices as an example of how a true conservative helps the common man Joe Lunch-bucket.

No, he won't put on price controls or fund some dumb-a$$ train system.

He would remove regulations on drilling and refining so the free market could work.

Remove the corn gas mandates and all the Heinz 57 blends of gas.

We would be swimming in $2 gas in a couple years.

7 posted on 08/01/2013 11:11:37 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; onyx

Seriously, Victor?

8 posted on 08/01/2013 11:23:06 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I aim to raise a million plus for Gov. Palin. What'll you do?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Just needs a little ‘nudge’. People don’t know what’s good for them unless you tell them what they should want.


9 posted on 08/01/2013 11:45:04 AM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Of course, Hoover was the most inept “expert” political hack this country has ever seen.

On Hoover, President Coolidge has this to day:

“That man has offered me unsolicited advice every day for six years, all of it bad.”

Coolidge also derisively nicknamed Hoover: “Wonder Boy.”

So yes, Hoover disliked the common man.


10 posted on 08/01/2013 11:48:03 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: livius

Conservative populism would consists of something like “I’m going to get the government off of your backs”.

That would appeal to a LOT of voters. Particularly younger ones with a Libertarian streak. But I’ve not heard any politician utter them since Reagan wrote his touching “goodbye letter”.


11 posted on 08/01/2013 12:17:02 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

thanks


12 posted on 08/01/2013 12:26:44 PM PDT by Excellence (All your database are belong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Ping


13 posted on 08/01/2013 12:39:53 PM PDT by neverdem (Register pressure cookers! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omega4412
Followers of Rand started the Objectivist Party. I like what they stand for, but they have the same No Chance as all the other third parties.
14 posted on 08/01/2013 1:19:21 PM PDT by Razz Barry (Round'em up, send'em home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Wrong rhetoric again, writer for the political/regulator class.




From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 :

Populism \Pop"u*lism\, n. (U. S. Politics)
The political doctrines advocated by the People's party.
[Webster 1913 Suppl.]




We common Americans are not the ones who collaborated with foreign communist nations against the USA, and we're not the ones who outlawed manufacturing competition at local levels in the USA. The favored few constituents of the DNC and GOP ordered their politicians to do that.

Dump the local government regulations against working class men producing useful things. Dump residential building regulatory offices. Their inhabitants are going to be idle for decades anyway. If you want revenues for your bureaucracy and propaganda girls, get them off of us. Let us do what we do best--supporting your lazy selves with our small shop manufacturing and small agriculture.

Otherwise, have fun. Enjoy the slide.


15 posted on 08/01/2013 2:11:49 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Gas has gone up about $2 a gallon...Such a crushing burden on the cash-strapped commuter class..."

The game's over on that foolery. Look at the near future with the hundreds of millions of drivers and manufacturing increases in formerly third world countries for the truth of the matter--according to our global U.S. bosses, workers far better than Americans.

Oil will go up, and the dollar will fall with decreasing American production. The commuting paradigm for limiting employment to socially pathological (politically correct) employees is dead. Deal with it. There's no way out.


16 posted on 08/01/2013 2:22:39 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson