Its WAY better than NPR taking its message from the sham liberal organization called “Center for Science in the Public Interest”
“Conservatives, you can actually get a lot of votes among scientists - a whole bunch of them really dislike the social engineering and irrational naturalistic fetishes of the left.”
Where do you think the impulse for social engineering, and the unhealthy emphasis on naturalism stem from? It’s certainly not from a belief that we were created by a higher power.
Some hacks petty argument with a writer at the Discovery Institute. Ho hum...let’s all run about waving our arms in alarm....or not.
This is where I don’t quite get a part of the “Intelligent Design” debate. If you believe in a God that’s in any way connected to the Bible, don’t you sort of have to believe that He designed it all in some way? You can quibble with others about how He did it, and you can even think that the people at Discovery are full of it, but you still have to agree with the premise that God designed it all. If not, I would really like to read an explanation. Does science demand Atheism or at least some oddball variant of Deism? I don’t think there’s that many scientists who will insist on that. What am I missing?
I’m sure there are hundreds of votes nationwide to be gained by blacklisting anti-evolutionists.
Can scientists take liberals seriously?
They deny that its a human baby in the womb. They deny that a man in a dress is a man. They believe that climate never changed before man woke up the first day.
The left doesn’t believe in actual science.
The Discovery Institute does not have anything to do with Wesley Smith’s view on IVF.