Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did ABC News Deceptively Edit Zimmerman Juror’s Controversial Interview?
The Blaze ^ | Jul. 26, 2013 | Jason Howerton

Posted on 07/26/2013 3:57:58 PM PDT by Ben Mugged

ABC News is being accused of deceptively editing, or at least misrepresenting (intentionally or not), some of the comments made by Juror B29, the lone “nonwhite” juror in the George Zimmerman murder trial. Further, the media as a whole are being accused of manipulating some of her statements.

These allegations come not from a conservative news source, but rather from Slate.com.

The key phrase latched onto by most media outlets, due to its sensational nature, was “George Zimmerman got away with murder” — words that were, in fact, said by Juror B29. But the full unedited video of the comment, in context, tells a different story, claims Slate’s William Saletan.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: dinosaurmedia; mediabias; mediadeathwatch; mediamalpractice; msm; trayvon; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
The MSM is stirring the race pot once more.
1 posted on 07/26/2013 3:57:58 PM PDT by Ben Mugged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

That’s all every single media outlet here locally is running with, that one statement..if this Juror wanted to get attention she got it. Now she can go back to watching her reality show stories


2 posted on 07/26/2013 3:59:29 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Read the article. Her intent was that Zimmerman was morally culpable not legally. She agrees with the verdict.


3 posted on 07/26/2013 4:02:08 PM PDT by Ben Mugged (The number one enemy of liberalism is reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

Oh I know what she said, its just that the media keeps on taking that one snippet and using it to their advantage. Doesn’t matter what she actually said, matters the quote that keeps on being used over and over again


4 posted on 07/26/2013 4:04:28 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

ABC stirring the RACIST SOUP. What’s the reason other than they are promoting more street violence. They should be sued along with NBC.


5 posted on 07/26/2013 4:06:09 PM PDT by spawn44 (MOO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spawn44

I could get into trouble for saying what I think should be done with ABC News.


6 posted on 07/26/2013 4:07:20 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
if this Juror wanted to get attention she got it. Now she can go back to watching her reality show stories

Maybe you should learn to read and not make an ass of yourself.

7 posted on 07/26/2013 4:07:29 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

They are trying to preserve the fiction they created.

For the “common good.”


8 posted on 07/26/2013 4:07:33 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

bookmark


9 posted on 07/26/2013 4:08:22 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

I read the article, my point is that people are seeing on TV that quote over and over again. I know what she meant but people who are seeing on TV what she said are NOT seeing the entire context


10 posted on 07/26/2013 4:08:37 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: spawn44

They dont call ABC the All Barack Channel for nothing


11 posted on 07/26/2013 4:09:08 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Selective editing and ABC sound rather familiar.


12 posted on 07/26/2013 4:09:29 PM PDT by Clyde5445
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
Sort of like the "I killed the clerk?" "confession" in My Cousin Vinny?
13 posted on 07/26/2013 4:10:09 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

I wonder if this whole thing is a put-up job to continue the Traydmark feeding frenzy?

Hopefully “Maddy” has had it with media interviews. They’re all a bunch of sharks.


14 posted on 07/26/2013 4:10:38 PM PDT by upchuck (To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clyde5445

NBC did the same thing so nothing new here


15 posted on 07/26/2013 4:11:10 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
The Vigilante Media strikes again.

Do we really want vigilantes abusing the First Amendment to target their enemies?

16 posted on 07/26/2013 4:13:51 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
At one point, Roberts asked the juror “whether the case should have gone to trial,” she replied, “I don’t think so. … I felt like this was a publicity stunt.”

Was that one of the un-aired deleted portions?

17 posted on 07/26/2013 4:15:24 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

I was thinking of Gibson and Gov. Palin.


18 posted on 07/26/2013 4:16:31 PM PDT by Clyde5445
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
The MSM is stirring the race pot once more.

If it ruined their ratings before, it'll surely salvage them this time, eh?

19 posted on 07/26/2013 4:16:59 PM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
The lady clearly said, she wanted to vote her heart .. guilty .. 'CAUSE THE EVIDENCE PROVED IT ... (which it didn't) ... but because the law wouldn't allow her to put an innocent man in prison ... she HAD to vote 'not guilty'.


What a mish/mash of I think I think.

20 posted on 07/26/2013 4:17:54 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson