Posted on 07/16/2013 12:42:39 PM PDT by neverdem
This article was originally published on The Heartland Institute’s website.
Brilliant scientific minds are not confined to the annals of scientific history. I have been blessed to have had a career in physics first influenced by a nodding acquaintance with Albert Einstein while a student at Princeton, then watching Hyman Rickover build our nuclear Navy, and finally almost having the opportunity to work with Edward Teller on what would have been his last book. Yet none have made a greater impression on me nor served as better mentors than Howard Hayden, emeritus professor of physics at the University of Connecticut. Howard produces a monthly newsletter titled, “The Energy Advocate,” in which he attempts to explain in clear terms the insanity of much of our nation’s energy policies as they attempt to rewrite the laws of physics that control the extraction of energy from our planet and universe.
This article, focusing on the amazing absurdity of ever believing that wind energy could efficiently contribute to a central electrical grid, is drawn from Hayden’s writings.
Little Justification for Subsidies
Federal taxpayer subsidies for wind power will almost certainly end; the only question is when. It defies logic for wind subsidies and mandates to continue when wind power is so costly, inefficient, and environmentally harmful. I will guess that the insanity could continue for another decade, with more and more industrial wind turbines added to the preexisting turbine blight on the American landscape.
Few of these turbines will last 20 years. Most will break down sooner than that, and most electricity sales contracts will not reap enough income for repairs. Few wind power companies have the financial reserves to dismantle these behemoth lawn sculptures. Just as it has taken massive subsidies to build the vast industrial wind installations, it will likely take massive subsidies to dismantle them. The resulting scene of permanent wind sculptures, monuments to the triumph of political favoritism over science and economics, will be frozen in time like a scene from science fiction—as though giant aliens descended onto our planet only to be frozen in place.
Optimistically, a wind turbine will generate electricity 30 percent of the time. However, we cannot predict when that time will be. A true wind power believer might be willing to do without electricity at the times the wind is not blowing, but the general population will not. During that 30 percent of the time the blades are spinning, conventional power plants still most keep cycling in order to ramp up quickly to compensate for the unpredictable 70 percent of the time when wind turbines are not producing power.
After two decades of huge subsidies for wind energy, nowhere in the world has an array of wind turbines replaced a single conventional power plant.
Limited Power Potential
The amount of power the wind can generate per acre of land is unrelated to the size of the turbines. Doubling the length of turbine blades doubles the power output of the turbine; however, turbines with longer blades must be separated by larger distances.
No matter how much money we invest in wind power technology, we know the earth will give up only an average of 5 kilowatts of electricity from wind energy per acre, which amounts to fully 300 square miles of land necessary to produce the 1000 megawatts generated by a conventional coal, natural gas, or nuclear power plant. Each of these conventional power plants requires merely a few hundred acres of land. This fulfills the average power demand of a city of 700,000 people.
Another inescapable problem for electric grids is that the power generated by a wind turbine varies with the cube of the wind speed. This means when the wind speed doubles – say from 10 miles per hour to 20 miles per hour – the energy output increases eight fold (2 x 2 x 2). Someone or some computer has to balance these huge variations on the grid by calling on standby generators to produce more or less power to maintain the stability that is so essential to the grid.
Strong winds are no more conducive to wind power generation than light winds. Turbines must shut down in high winds because strong centrifugal forces would tear the blades apart. Wind turbines rely on a fleeting Goldilocks zone of winds that are not too light but not too strong to generate power.
Rampant Structural Problems
Wind turbine infrastructure can be quite problematic. Thousands of mishaps, breakdowns, and accidents have been reported in recent years. The basic concrete foundations are suffering from frequent strains. The wind turbines themselves rarely remain functional after 20 years.
Severe Environmental Harms
Low frequency noise produced by the turbines is driving people from their homes. The turbines are also taking a toll on the environment. The Audubon Society estimates turbines kill more than a million birds per year. No wind farm has ever paid a fine for such environmental destruction, yet oil companies pay by the bird.
For all this environmental destruction, wind turbines fail to deliver the amount of electricity promised. Dirt, grit, and insect residue reduce the efficiency of wind turbine blades. A one millimeter buildup of insect residue on turbine blades reduces wind power generation by as much as 25 percent.
The fate of expensive, inefficient, environmentally destructive wind energy is sealed. The day is soon coming when the public will no longer tolerate such subsidies and mandates.
Jay Lehr, Ph.D. (jlehr@heartland.org) is senior fellow and science director of The Heartland Institute.
I heard the other day the astounding figure that there were something like 14,000 abandoned wind turbines in the U.S.
Once the subsidies run out the companies just quit maintaining them and they rust away.
Maybe the long tall vertical tubes can be turned into grain storage, or houses, or restaurants serving polish dogs.
Merely from an aesthetic point of view, I find them no more disturbing than silos, homes or barns. From an economic point of view they are a disaster.
This is bulls#it but there is one element of truth - subsidies are no longer needed. Modern utility scale wind turbines can make electricity at a parity cost without subsidies and even industry leaders have said so publicly. Cut the subsidies, but use the rest of this nonsense to line the litter pan, it’s as scientific as global warming.
Excellent piece. Bkmk
Sane people would have taken all that into consideration before building the damn things.
Obviously, their sanity was overruled by their fanatical devotion to the latest fad of the enviroment-wackos.
Besides, they kill birds.
Wind and solar power is a good idea for individual homes and farms. Mass generation is an Agenda 21 boondoggle designed to enrich a few insiders, deindustrialize the country, and deprive the public of affordable power.
Don't count on it. These things are the cathedrals of the Green-Left, and political expediency will dictate that wind subsidies continue for a very long time.
Drive down the Columbia River Gorge in Oregon. The site of miles of these on river cliffs is disturbing..
They are about as ugly as mosques.
I saw two that were actually working the other day.
turn them into low rent housing
I drove through Iowa back in May and saw miles and miles of these...not a one was turning. I am not exaggerating.
It wasn’t’t that the wind was too weak or strong, as far as I could tell. Heck, maybe they order them to stop during some bird migration season or something.
Yep. And the farmer is left with a broken windmill in his field.
What in particular do you find objectionable? Is it info related to durability, longevity or production?
And I thought cell towers poking up in beautiful pristine landscapes were awful.
Now these disgusting scourges.
Nailed it!
Just finished a vacation where we drove from Denver, CO to Houston, TX.
We saw hundreds and hundreds of these windmills. Huge things, twirling in the winds and looking pretty impressive.
I am concerned with the physics related to the forces of the wind pushing on the blades.
If I remember my HS physics correctly, we must conserve energy and momentum during the conversion of kinetic wind energy.
The winds are pushing on the fan blades causing them to rotate and there is also a loss of energy in the wind because instead of blowing freely, the wind energy is converted to mechanical energy.
There is also an equal and opposite force coming back from the blades, the tower and finally the earth itself.
Therefore, my theory is, the rotation of the earth may be disrupted in the long term plan and we all go flying into space since the Earth is no longer rotating on its axis.
We’re DOOMED!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.