Skip to comments.
Two more female officers fail in Marines’ infantry course
The Washington Times ^
| July 3, 2013
| Rowan Scarborough
Posted on 07/03/2013 9:46:38 AM PDT by jazusamo
A third pair of female Marine lieutenants has failed to complete the Corps Infantry Officer Course at Quantico, Va.
The Marine Corps Times embedded a reporter with the latest class of candidates. It reported Wednesday that one of the women was pulled for falling behind schedule. The other made it to the courses end but did not meet its standards, as did six men, the newspaper said.
Corps commanders have said they will not lower standards to ensure that women can qualify for direct ground combat units. The Pentagon last winter lifted the ban on women in such jobs, but it has opted to conduct two years of study on how sex-integration would work for infantry, armor and special operations.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: diversity; infantry; marines; usmc; women; womenincombat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
It's good the Marine Corps is sticking to its standards, hopefully Obama and Jarrett won't look for new commanders.
1
posted on
07/03/2013 9:46:38 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
it’s just not a problem. I’m sure the jihadists would be happy to have separate wars for men & women.
2
posted on
07/03/2013 9:48:19 AM PDT
by
JohnBrowdie
(http://forum.stink-eye.net)
To: jazusamo
It’s not easy being green.
3
posted on
07/03/2013 9:49:03 AM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: jazusamo
two years of study on how sex-integration would work for infantry, armor and special operation
Two years? How about in a NY minute - FAIL.
4
posted on
07/03/2013 9:49:55 AM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: jazusamo
The Marines have pride in themselves, their high standards, and our country. Unlike the democrat party.
5
posted on
07/03/2013 9:50:49 AM PDT
by
I want the USA back
(If I Pi$$ed off just one liberal today my mission has been accomplished.)
To: jazusamo
They should study current female availability rates in the military. They’ll find going to war with women means empty positions when they are needed.
6
posted on
07/03/2013 9:51:21 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
To: jazusamo
7
posted on
07/03/2013 9:51:54 AM PDT
by
rfreedom4u
(I have a copy of the Constitution! And I'm not afraid to use it!)
To: jazusamo
Corps commanders have said they will not lower standards to ensure that women can qualify for direct ground combat units. Not yet. If the Commandant refuses to issue lowered standards for women, then Obastard will replace him with a lesbian general who will.
8
posted on
07/03/2013 9:52:30 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
To: jazusamo
Butt-buddies and jihadists in our military. Now all we need is a gender-normed bunch of 03’s.
9
posted on
07/03/2013 9:52:37 AM PDT
by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
To: JohnBrowdie
just keep lowering the requirement until it becomes the Peace Corps with guns. Imagine valley girls texting during thier quarter-mile march to the mall.
10
posted on
07/03/2013 9:52:55 AM PDT
by
GeronL
To: jazusamo
To: Blood of Tyrants
I believe you may be right.
12
posted on
07/03/2013 9:54:53 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
To: jazusamo
In the only example that is given in the article, it was an easy test for men. Climb up a rope for only 20 ft.
Hey, the Marines should recruit those Hollywood women since they can whup 20 men at once while being 95 lbs soak and wet. ;^)
To: CodeToad
Yup - easy to get pregnant.
Hey, here’s a solution - require females in war fighting positions to have a tubal ligation (is that the term?) and require males to have a vasectomy. It is, after all, a volunteer military .....
14
posted on
07/03/2013 9:55:31 AM PDT
by
tgusa
(gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .......)
To: jazusamo
Girls shouldn’t try to do men’s jobs. Let the men be men.
15
posted on
07/03/2013 9:56:05 AM PDT
by
BarbM
(Portuguese Dog--Kenyan president)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Precisely. Bank on it.
16
posted on
07/03/2013 9:56:16 AM PDT
by
Obadiah
(Inside of every Liberal beats the heart of a fascist yearning to reveal their true nature.)
To: ConjunctionJunction
That sounds like something that butt kisser would say.
17
posted on
07/03/2013 9:56:52 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
To: jazusamo
Marine Statement:"A Corps memo sent to Congress, and obtained by The Washington Times, said it is developing a predictive mechanism. The Marine Corps high standards cannot be lowered, nor can we artificially lower them to ensure a certain percentage of females will qualify, the memo states. Conversely, we will not artificially raise standards.
Response: Reading between the lines the Marines will, in fact, lower their physical standards. The public will never be informed. Sorry to be so cynicalbut Egalitarianism trumps even the nations survival.
18
posted on
07/03/2013 9:59:25 AM PDT
by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: jazusamo
That would be Dempsey to a “T”.
To: ConjunctionJunction
Dempsey is a pussy himself, so.....
20
posted on
07/03/2013 10:00:18 AM PDT
by
clintonh8r
("Europe was created by history. America was created by a philosophy." Baroness Thatcher)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson