Posted on 06/05/2013 1:27:41 PM PDT by Perdogg
” The one single thing he says he objects to is border enforcement stuff but if you think about it any bill they pass will depend on an POTUS appointee loyalist to enforce it, which would be an Obama Holder type guy. So what’s his point? To tease and say that immigration reform will only work if he is POTUS? “
: )
Rubio deserves all that he is getting.
Telling the truth about that weasel is not ‘trashing’.
He’s been pro-illegal since the days that he was in the Florida government. He fought attempts by conservatives in Florida to enforce laws against illegals.
He’s a fraud and needs to be exposed for what he is.
” He’s been pro-illegal since the days that he was in the Florida government. He fought attempts by conservatives in Florida to enforce laws against illegals.”
TOO FEW PEOPLE BOTHERED TO RESEARCH THIS.
I also see a Rubio vs Paul, neo-con versus libertarian, feud going on here. Like both sides want THEIR guy to be the one and they each see the other one as THE threat. This can be entertaining at times.
Remember when Bachman announced in 2011 and the Palinistas turned on her her because they saw her as a threat to their momma bear fantasy??? (Palin eventually voted for Newt).
Well its similar silliness.
“I also see a Rubio vs Paul, neo-con versus libertarian, feud going on here”
and they both outed themselves as amnesty liberals. As did Paul Ryan.
The Treason Lobby did us a favor here by revealing who their supporters in Congress are.
” I also see a Rubio vs Paul, neo-con versus libertarian, feud going on here. Like both sides want THEIR guy to be the one and they each see the other one as THE threat. “
I see this as well.
Maybe people should form their own opinions on politicians without relying on a talking head to do it for them?
Crazy, I know. ;p
” Maybe people should form their own opinions on politicians without relying on a talking head to do it for them?”
That requires common sense, and some effort : )
“I also see a Rubio vs Paul, neo-con versus libertarian, feud going on here
and they both outed themselves as amnesty liberals. As did Paul Ryan.
The Treason Lobby did us a favor here by revealing who their supporters in Congress are.”
All three hailed as saviors here, at one point or another. Now all three proven to be part of the Treason Lobby. Good point.
But Rush is always right, always, he says so and he must be right because he says he is always right.
I get dizzy trying to follow that circle.
How will Rush explain Rubio, when it becomes public that he is in bed with LaRaza?
Answer: It will never be discussed on his show.
I think you know by now that I don't trust any amnesty bill from either house, even if it specifically states they will NEVER get to vote (and of course the Ted Kennedy promise "We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this" (true, this time it will be much bigger). I have seen too many tricks among rogue POTUSes, judges, and bureaucrats.
Plus, assume Amnesty I passed with no "path to citizenship." They would marshal their forces and beat their drums, including the media, for Amnesty II. Czechoslovakia 1938 gave Hitler what he wanted in exchange for nothing.
Under Obama Rule, any kind of amnesty is 100% amnesty.
Dont ya get the impression that they all are dreaming of the WH??
Under Obama Illegals are already legal. So why would the amnesty forces even bother with an amnesty bill without a "path to citizenship?" They want to claim they passed "something?"
But that assumes that the O-forces actually care what a law says. Who is going to stop the "Any kind of amnesty is 100% amnesty?" Not the SCOTUS, not the GOP. And the voters elected O 2 times in a row.
” Dont ya get the impression that they all are dreaming of the WH?? “
Of course, the delusional SOBS : )
” But that assumes that the O-forces actually care what a law says. Who is going to stop the “Any kind of amnesty is 100% amnesty?”
Answer is nobody will stop the 100% amnesty. How many know that Obama doesn’t enforce the borders at all, and illegal immigrants have increased over 200% in the past few months?
What is it about 8-1=7 that Marco doesn’t get?
The Rubio-Stupak analogy is right on target.
Except they would NEVER go for that, Dems would bail in droves from a bill that doesnt give illegals the vote in a amnesty bill. It would never make it through either House.
Look how they rallied Blacks, Hispanics, etc to vote by waging a 'they are trying to stop you from voting' campaign last year, using voter ID as an excuse. There is no way they would let businesses have more worker competition wo getting them the vote in return.
I believe Rubio’s excuse focuses on weak enforcement rather than denying citizenship simply because his excuse he sees is the least offensive to Hispanics. "Its all the Dems fault we cant legalize your relatives"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.