Posted on 06/05/2013 3:54:48 AM PDT by Kaslin
A U.S. attorney in Tennessee said that it's possible that some inflammatory criticism of Muslims posted on social networking sites could violate federal civil rights laws.
We need to educate people about Muslims and their civil rights, and as long as were here, theyre going to be protected, U.S. attorney Bill Killian told the Tullahoma News last week. This is also to inform the public about what federal laws are in effect and what the consequences are.
Killian, along with an FBI agent, are expected to attend a meeting Tuesday in Manchester, Tenn. hosted by a local Muslim group to educate people on the First Amendment and its application in society.
His comments sparked concern among conservative groups that the federal government is about to crack down on anti-Muslim rhetoric -- a claim the U.S. attorney denies.
It has nothing to do with Sharia law, Killian told me in a telephone interview. It has to do with the United States Constitution and federal statutes. You have a right under the First Amendment to hate Muslims. You can hate all Muslims if you want to."
But he added a caveat -- "as long as it does not rise to the level of violating federal civil rights laws.
The meeting comes after a Tennessee lawmaker posted a photograph of a man aiming a shotgun with the caption, How to wink at a Muslim.
Its an open forum to discuss the First Amendment -- to discuss its application to all religions and to Muslim religions, he said. And to discuss federal civil rights statutes which weve done at other times and other places.
Killian said the federal government has participated in at least a dozen similar Muslim education meetings across the state.
But Andy Miller, of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition, believes the federal government is using those meetings to silence and intimidate critics of Islam.
Theres an effort to step on free speech -- any speech thats contrary to Islam, Miller tells me. It seems like our federal government is going down that path.
Miller said Tennessee has become a battleground over what he called a crackdown on anti-Muslim speech.
This is the Bible Belt, he said. Theres an effort to prove that if they can do it here, they can do it anywhere.
Killian said the supposition that the federal government would prosecute people for exercising their constitutional rights is ridiculous.
We dont prosecute people for the First Amendment, he said. In fact, this event is promoting the First Amendment for all people -- not only to exercise their religion, but to express their freedom of speech regardless of what it is.
But the big question is where free speech might cross the line and violate federal civil rights laws.
Could an Internet posting or letter in the mail or a phone call or a personal confrontation constitute a violation of those statutes, he asked, citing 18 US Code 241 and 18 US Code 245. Yes, it could.
So what about the lawmaker who posted the photograph of the shotgun? Would that be a violation of federal law?
I dont know whether it does or not, Killian said. Were treating that as if it were offensive conduct and trying to use this event as we have on many other occasions in the district -- utilize events of this nature to have people understand the Muslim religion and the Arab and Muslim people.
Miller said the governments explanation is problematic.
It doesnt make anybody here locally feel any better, he said. It seems as though they are creating a sacred group here that consistently gets attention from the federal government.
Its interesting the Department of Justice and Homeland Security really seem to take up the banner for the Muslim population, Miller said. Why arent they having one for the Baptists? Why arent they having one for the Methodists? Why arent they having one for Jews?
And Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, believes the Obama administration is using federal law to protect Muslims from criticism, Politico reports.
In its latest effort to protect followers of Islam in the U.S., the Obama Justice Department warns against using social media to spread information considered inflammatory against Muslims, threatening that it could constitute a violation of civil rights, the group wrote online.
I figger as long as I wear bacon scented cologne, those goat fornicators will leave me the hell alone.
http://www.atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/06/massive-crowd-in-machester-.html
Seems to me they’re failing to remember the part about separation of church and state, oft stated by liberals like themselves. I guess only when it serves them. But seems they’re promoting a certain religion here.
I swear, these muthas want the shooting to start, don’t they?
This evil Administration violates the Law on a regular basis—didn’t Eric the holder of O’s water say recently it doesn’t matter if they violate the Constitution — No Court in the land would dare challenge Obama.(or the false claim of “National Security “)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.