Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fort Hood suspect wants to represent himself
Associated Press ^ | May 22, 2013 7:43 PM EDT | Angela K. Brown

Posted on 05/23/2013 2:31:15 AM PDT by Olog-hai

The Army psychiatrist charged in the deadly 2009 Fort Hood attack wants to represent himself at his upcoming murder trial, which means he could question the nearly three dozen soldiers he’s accused of wounding in the shooting rampage.

Maj. Nidal Hasan’s request, announced Wednesday by Fort Hood officials, is to be considered at a pretrial hearing next week. The request prompted the military judge, Col. Tara Osborn, to delay jury selection to June 5, about a week after it was scheduled to start.

Hasan, an American-born Muslim, faces the death penalty or life in prison without parole if convicted of 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder in the Nov. 5, 2009, attack on the Texas Army post, about 125 miles southwest of Fort Worth. …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Texas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: forthoodshooting; nidalhasan; rop; selfrepresentataion

1 posted on 05/23/2013 2:31:15 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

As all muslims, he wants to murder and then proselytize.

Take him out back and chop his head off.


2 posted on 05/23/2013 2:46:28 AM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

exterminate this POS and get it over with


3 posted on 05/23/2013 2:47:17 AM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Well, I say let him speak.

He certainly won’t be going on about the hazards of the workplace.

He’ll clearly let everyone know what he is - doing the job the obama gang refused to do.


4 posted on 05/23/2013 3:05:17 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Then, when he’s convicted, he’ll appeal on the grounds of inadequate representation. What a *BLEEP*ing dog-and-pony show.


5 posted on 05/23/2013 3:12:06 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

Judges, prosecutors, and opposing counsel love pro se defendants but I’d suspect 0 will make sure he has proper representation.


6 posted on 05/23/2013 3:13:58 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

Wrong. Have you ever sat thru a trial, or even a hearing with a pro per (pro se) defendant? It is so PAINFUL! The judge feels like he has to explain everything to the D, so it all takes twice as long, and in the end, usually a court-appointed attny has to clean up the mess. I love when the D appeals, and reps himself. I don’t care what happens at those trials, I don’t have to work them!


7 posted on 05/23/2013 3:50:54 AM PDT by blu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blu

I was being sarcastic. Only a fool represents himself in court.


8 posted on 05/23/2013 4:01:41 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

What possible justification is there for a three and one half year time lapse between crime and trial?


9 posted on 05/23/2013 4:06:37 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory, and He will not be mocked! Blessed be the Name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

He’s GUILTY. Why the heck is it taking so long?
What’s with our military?????


10 posted on 05/23/2013 4:06:42 AM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The only thing I care about...will he, or will he not have a beard?

LOOK! A bird flew by!


11 posted on 05/23/2013 4:12:19 AM PDT by Daffynition (Stand Your Ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

It’s time they stopped playing games with this killer.

It’s been a game the whole time.

They should have left the trash lying where he fell to bleed out, but we have spent a fortune saving this clown, and we are still playing.


12 posted on 05/23/2013 4:21:33 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o
What possible justification is there for a three and one half year time lapse between crime and trial?


13 posted on 05/23/2013 4:25:20 AM PDT by WVKayaker ("...the press had better learn from their experiences of being duped "...-Sarah Palin 5/17/13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Represent your fagot islamic bunghole against that post while I get my rifle and a rag for your blindfold.

LLS


14 posted on 05/23/2013 4:29:19 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

Since he’s not a terrorist....just a work-place situation....and the military won’t qualify him as a nut, I think the military judge may be forced to accept a situation where a military attorney is assigned to provide advice, and just watch the event go in this weird direction.

In thirty-odd years associated, I can only recall one occasion where a military individual chose to represent himself (with legal advisers sitting at the table). Unless the military really screwed up....it’s not advisable.

The problem in this case is that it’s a predetermined result. You can’t go any other direction, but declare him guilty.


15 posted on 05/23/2013 4:32:59 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Lets try and hang this SOB already.Justice delyed is Justice denied.

The government needs to stop stonewalling on this case even if this perp is Obama’s pal.


16 posted on 05/23/2013 5:06:02 AM PDT by puppypusher (The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o
What possible justification is there for a three and one half year time lapse between crime and trial?

Bingo!

17 posted on 05/23/2013 5:14:29 AM PDT by Flick Lives (We're going to be just like the old Soviet Union, but with free cell phones!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Justification?

Obozo

The Jihadist Muzzie Vermin will not die on his watch.


18 posted on 05/23/2013 5:19:54 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

I continue to maintain Hasan will never be tried. Too many unseen allies in his chain of command who don’t want to go down with him. Complicity or accessory to a crime is serious business.

Not to mention the avalanche of civil suits sure to follow his conviction.

Aimed at all those senior officers who saw Hasan’s numerous jihadi manifestations including his “death-to-infidels” PowerPoint presentation to an audience one hundred strong, and not one of them said even, “WTF!!?”


19 posted on 05/23/2013 5:48:41 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

“Too many unseen allies in his chain of command who don’t want to go down with him.”

Had not thought about that, but it makes sense.

Of course, Obozo does not want to be the one to be blamed from killing a fellow Muzzie. Hassan was in Obozo’s transition team.


20 posted on 05/23/2013 11:16:35 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson