Deadly force can be used to protect property at night in Texas.
1 posted on
05/16/2013 4:10:46 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
2 posted on
05/16/2013 4:13:12 AM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: marktwain
Ah, yes, the culture of life.
3 posted on
05/16/2013 4:14:08 AM PDT by
Wolfie
To: marktwain
Stepson, eh? I’m doubly sorry to hear that. It’s going to be hell around his place for some time to come.
Having dealt with step-children before I know it can be a real emotional roller-coaster.
To: marktwain
There’s more going on here.
5 posted on
05/16/2013 4:15:47 AM PDT by
freedomfiter2
(Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
To: marktwain
“The vandal, who turned out to be the gunman’s stepson”
To me that is incidental and makes no difference.
6 posted on
05/16/2013 4:29:09 AM PDT by
V_TWIN
To: marktwain
11 posted on
05/16/2013 4:48:03 AM PDT by
Mercat
To: marktwain
“the gunman?”
Is that their way of showing they disapprove of the man protecting his own property?
To: marktwain
Has been long before the “castle law”.
15 posted on
05/16/2013 5:29:02 AM PDT by
Feckless
(I was trained by the US << This Tagline Censored by FR >> ain't that irOnic?)
To: marktwain
16 posted on
05/16/2013 5:32:03 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
( Liberal is to patriotism as Kermit Gosnell is to neonatal care.)
To: marktwain
Thanksgiving just ain’t goin’ to be the same this year.
To: marktwain
I love TX. In most states that would be “murder”. However, considering that property requires significant time and energy to acquire and maintain, the vandal was stealing part of his life by destroying the car. I’m okay with solving that problem - permanently.
19 posted on
05/16/2013 6:19:12 AM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson