Posted on 04/30/2013 1:50:21 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
Because a teenage boy having sex with a hot experienced women is as natural as the driven snow.
A pedophile homosexual act is not natural, and an abomination. Get real. We are talking about anal sex in the later case.
Okay. We're also talking about someone who is physically the equal of an adult making a voluntary decision to engage in sexual activity. Presumably the student got something out of it, just as he would have if he'd accommodated a female teacher.
I don’t agree with this at all! That being said, you and I will have to agree to disagree about a forty year old woman having sex with a 13, 14 or 15 year old boy and that being “natural”. Teachers, doctors, clergy person... anyone of authority should not be permitted to have sex with any subordinate period.
Another coprophile to spend a short time in a cage. Out them for what they are; male child rapists, disease ridden, and coprophagic. Hey, it is the gay way.
I have the feeling that this is a male vs female thing and I’m not sure why? I wouldn’t want a teacher making at pass at either my son or daughter. Just like an older female teacher can tell herself that she is desirable because she “got” a teen boy... this male gay teacher will do the same. IMHO.
Bestiality is wrong no matter the age and position of the participants(no pun intended)
Yes, bestiality is wrong. Sodomy is wrong. Fornication is wrong.
The argument for “hot teacher”/teenage boy is that the teenage boy gets pleasure from it. Well, presumably the teenage girl gets pleasure from activity with an adult (male or female), unless there’s physical coercion. The boy gets something out of oral or anal sex with the male teacher or other adult man, or he wouldn’t do it.
Without consistency, there’s nothing other than “consent” defined as an absence of physical force.
Agreed. I feel when we “okay” or permit some relationships.. we have pushed the boundaries to permit them all.
A young man is not risking much in having sex with an older woman, use a rubber and you are good. No man or boy is going to get pregnant.
Anal sex besides being abhorrent and disgusting is dangerous.
If you want to equate the 2 then go ahead, most discerning folks can see a difference.
Free David! Get with the damn program.
And yet, young males agree to it, when nobody's holding a weapon.
Explain?
Explain what? You explain the equivalence you are applying to the two situations.
Explain why young males agree to something that is "abhorrent and disgusting," extra point for the double-rr.
Your implication is that they'll do anything that involves genital pleasure, irrespective of all other considerations.
If I've totally misunderstood, I'd like to know where the divergence occurs.
Did you see the description of the teacher? 270 lbs.
>> what is the real difference
That is relativism.
You both need to give greater consideration to what you’re saying.
Is it that incomprehensible that a young man would want to have sex with an attractive teacher? Really? And secondly you can’t see the difference between that and faggotry? really?
I meant to say FEMALE teacher, so you don't go all hermatile on me.
Have the Obamas called in their congrats yet?
>> The argument for “hot teacher”/teenage boy
How does a poster’s “hot teacher” fantasy normalize the homosexual component in this case of statutory rape?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.