Skip to comments.Paedophile wins legal battle to work where he might encounter children
Posted on 04/24/2013 10:41:48 AM PDT by massmike
Stelios Kimpriktzis, 38, who is HIV positive, was jailed for three years in 2006 for having unprotected sex with a young boy.
As part of his punishment, the trial judge imposed a sexual offences prevention order, or SOPO, which on his eventual release from prison banned him from working anywhere he might come into contact with under-16s. But in an appeal yesterday, three of the countrys most senior judges overturned the restriction even though they described him as a predatory paedophile.
Lady Justice Hallett, sitting with Mr Justice Bean and Judge Michael Pert QC, said it would not be right to condemn Kimpriktzis to a lifetime on benefits where he was unable to take any job.
It must be understood that we are under an obligation to apply the law and, despite the seriousness of this crime, we cannot just lock someone up and throw away the key, she said.
He has served his punishment. This court does what it can to protect children. You can do your best, but if you are simply depriving him of all liberty forever, the law does not allow you to do that.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
“Mr Justice Bean”
“it would not be right to condemn Kimpriktzis to a lifetime on benefits where he was unable to take any job.”
False choice. How about a job where he won’t encounter children?
We’re so worried about this prick’s rights? This society must really reaaally hate children....
Because it would just be impossible to find a job where he has no contact with kids, right, judges? How about YOU hire him to take care of YOUR kids or grandkids, mkay, judges?
The judge makes a good argument for making it a capital crime. Then no one would need to worry about where this guy worked ~ pushing up daisies.
future Boy Scout camping leader?
I predict that he’ll be working in the White House in a year or so.
‘The court allowed the appeal and removed employment restrictions.
However, Kimpriktzis remains banned from unsupervised contact with children under 17 without parental permission.
He also remains banned from certain professions such as teaching, nursing or driving a school bus remains in place until 2016.’
In what way is not being allowed to work around 16 year-olds and under the same as “depriving him of all liberty forever”? What a mess of a mind.
Yeah but they won’t use that same argument to defend a non-violent felon who served their time and wants to own a gun or vote again, but deviant it is ok.
Apparently this judge does not care about children. When an HIV positive pedophile wants to work around children, after already being convicted of "having unprotected sex with a young boy", any decent person would show more concern. Also, why can't we lock him up forever, or at least change the laws to lock up future predators like him forever?
Hey, they’re gonna’ let faggots in the Boy Scouts, so I’m not at all surprised . . . faggots for our youngsters, and then when they get older and join the service, they get MORE faggots. Amazing what 1-1/2% of our population can do the the non-fighting 98-1/2%
Going after young boys is a decadence manifestation; i.e. the need for ever increasing stimulation in order to maintain the same feeling of "aliveness."
Might I suggest the judge employ this perv as a sitter for his children/grandchildren?
You are talking about the country that won’t deport dangerous terrorists because it would deprive them of being near their welfare collecting wives and piglet spawn.
Then the British law is a British ass.
< / Who are we to judge >
If rape of children was a capital crime,
could we have hung Mohammed?
when he will have certainly learned his lesson!
LOL, another day, another sick joke in post-rational Western Civilization.
Who wrote this article? “Unprotected sex” with an 8-year-old boy - there is no such thing! He RAPED a child. I can’t believe how western civilization is dying and it’s reflected in the language people use.
I guess the leftists are only upset at the “unprotected” thing
It’s disgusting. That poor child. The article said the creep groomed the boy, took him into the woods, and “persuaded” him to have sex. BS. It was rape, and that boy had no choice. They will probably tell the boy he brought it on himself.
There are those who say if the boy consented it should be okay, even if they are groomed and desensitized,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.