Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paedophile wins legal battle to work where he might encounter children
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/ ^ | 04/24/2013 | David Barrett

Posted on 04/24/2013 10:41:48 AM PDT by massmike

Stelios Kimpriktzis, 38, who is HIV positive, was jailed for three years in 2006 for having unprotected sex with a young boy.

As part of his punishment, the trial judge imposed a sexual offences prevention order, or SOPO, which on his eventual release from prison banned him from working anywhere he might come into contact with under-16s. But in an appeal yesterday, three of the country’s most senior judges overturned the restriction even though they described him as a “predatory paedophile”.

Lady Justice Hallett, sitting with Mr Justice Bean and Judge Michael Pert QC, said it would not be right to condemn Kimpriktzis to a lifetime on benefits where he was unable to take any job.

“It must be understood that we are under an obligation to apply the law and, despite the seriousness of this crime, we cannot just lock someone up and throw away the key,” she said.

“He has served his punishment. This court does what it can to protect children. You can do your best, but if you are simply depriving him of all liberty forever, the law does not allow you to do that.”

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: hiv; homosexualagenda; pedophile; sourcetitlenoturl

1 posted on 04/24/2013 10:41:48 AM PDT by massmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: massmike

“Mr Justice Bean”

Seriously??


2 posted on 04/24/2013 10:43:19 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do ithat when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

“it would not be right to condemn Kimpriktzis to a lifetime on benefits where he was unable to take any job.”

False choice. How about a job where he won’t encounter children?


3 posted on 04/24/2013 10:45:02 AM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

We’re so worried about this prick’s rights? This society must really reaaally hate children....


4 posted on 04/24/2013 10:46:30 AM PDT by Wanderer99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Because it would just be impossible to find a job where he has no contact with kids, right, judges? How about YOU hire him to take care of YOUR kids or grandkids, mkay, judges?


5 posted on 04/24/2013 10:46:45 AM PDT by GadareneDemoniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

The judge makes a good argument for making it a capital crime. Then no one would need to worry about where this guy worked ~ pushing up daisies.


6 posted on 04/24/2013 10:47:58 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GadareneDemoniac

future Boy Scout camping leader?


7 posted on 04/24/2013 10:48:18 AM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: massmike

I predict that he’ll be working in the White House in a year or so.


8 posted on 04/24/2013 10:48:20 AM PDT by Wanderer99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

‘The court allowed the appeal and removed employment restrictions.

However, Kimpriktzis remains banned from unsupervised contact with children under 17 without parental permission.

He also remains banned from certain professions such as teaching, nursing or driving a school bus remains in place until 2016.’

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-22269010


9 posted on 04/24/2013 10:48:42 AM PDT by the scotsman (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Roger that.


10 posted on 04/24/2013 10:50:30 AM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: massmike

In what way is not being allowed to work around 16 year-olds and under the same as “depriving him of all liberty forever”? What a mess of a mind.


11 posted on 04/24/2013 10:50:49 AM PDT by TurkeyLurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Yeah but they won’t use that same argument to defend a non-violent felon who served their time and wants to own a gun or vote again, but deviant it is ok.


12 posted on 04/24/2013 10:54:10 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
Stelios Kimpriktzis, 38, who is HIV positive, was jailed for three years in 2006 for having unprotected sex with a young boy . . . “He has served his punishment. This court does what it can to protect children. You can do your best, but if you are simply depriving him of all liberty forever, the law does not allow you to do that.”

Apparently this judge does not care about children. When an HIV positive pedophile wants to work around children, after already being convicted of "having unprotected sex with a young boy", any decent person would show more concern. Also, why can't we lock him up forever, or at least change the laws to lock up future predators like him forever?

13 posted on 04/24/2013 10:54:42 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Hey, they’re gonna’ let faggots in the Boy Scouts, so I’m not at all surprised . . . faggots for our youngsters, and then when they get older and join the service, they get MORE faggots. Amazing what 1-1/2% of our population can do the the non-fighting 98-1/2%


14 posted on 04/24/2013 10:58:41 AM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
He is a Homosexual(Sodomite). The pedophile dodge is a creation of the Sodomite lobby and their MSM friends designed to misdirect the normals and give Sodomite unquestioned access to young boys.

Going after young boys is a decadence manifestation; i.e. the need for ever increasing stimulation in order to maintain the same feeling of "aliveness."

15 posted on 04/24/2013 10:59:40 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Might I suggest the judge employ this perv as a sitter for his children/grandchildren?


16 posted on 04/24/2013 11:01:09 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wanderer99

You are talking about the country that won’t deport dangerous terrorists because it would deprive them of being near their welfare collecting wives and piglet spawn.


17 posted on 04/24/2013 11:05:13 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Then the British law is a British ass.


18 posted on 04/24/2013 11:13:19 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

< / Who are we to judge >


19 posted on 04/24/2013 11:13:57 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (All observant Muslims want to kill you. If they don't, they are not really Muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

If rape of children was a capital crime,

could we have hung Mohammed?


20 posted on 04/24/2013 11:15:23 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (All observant Muslims want to kill you. If they don't, they are not really Muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Excellent point.


21 posted on 04/24/2013 11:16:39 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: massmike

22 posted on 04/24/2013 11:19:14 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman
until 2016

when he will have certainly learned his lesson!

LOL, another day, another sick joke in post-rational Western Civilization.

23 posted on 04/24/2013 11:24:14 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (So?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Yep.


24 posted on 04/24/2013 11:35:53 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Who wrote this article? “Unprotected sex” with an 8-year-old boy - there is no such thing! He RAPED a child. I can’t believe how western civilization is dying and it’s reflected in the language people use.


25 posted on 04/24/2013 12:04:37 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

I guess the leftists are only upset at the “unprotected” thing


26 posted on 04/24/2013 12:09:20 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

It’s disgusting. That poor child. The article said the creep groomed the boy, took him into the woods, and “persuaded” him to have sex. BS. It was rape, and that boy had no choice. They will probably tell the boy he brought it on himself.


27 posted on 04/24/2013 12:33:08 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

There are those who say if the boy consented it should be okay, even if they are groomed and desensitized,

disgusting.


28 posted on 04/24/2013 12:35:03 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson